岩层倾向对喀斯特槽谷区地表/地下产流过程的影响

覃自阳; 甘凤玲; 何丙辉

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

岩层倾向对喀斯特槽谷区地表/地下产流过程的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 岩层倾向对喀斯特槽谷区地表/地下产流过程的影响
- Influence of Strata Tendency on the Surface / Underground Runoff Production Process in Typical Karst Valley
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：68-75
- 作者机构：
  
  西南大学资源环境学院, 三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆,400715
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "覃自阳(1994-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事城市水土保持研究。E-mail:1027068052@qq.com." ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41771312）国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0502303）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.010
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
覃自阳, 甘凤玲, 何丙辉. 岩层倾向对喀斯特槽谷区地表/地下产流过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):68-75.

QIN Ziyang, GAN Fengling, HE Binghui. Influence of Strata Tendency on the Surface / Underground Runoff Production Process in Typical Karst Valley[J]. 2020, 34(5): 68-75.
覃自阳, 甘凤玲, 何丙辉. 岩层倾向对喀斯特槽谷区地表/地下产流过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):68-75. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.010.

QIN Ziyang, GAN Fengling, HE Binghui. Influence of Strata Tendency on the Surface / Underground Runoff Production Process in Typical Karst Valley[J]. 2020, 34(5): 68-75. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.010.

摘要

喀斯特槽谷区在降雨过程中极易发生水土流失，这使得该区生态环境被破坏。以喀斯特槽谷区为研究对象，通过室内模拟其典型顺/逆层坡面特征及地下孔裂隙发育程度，利用人工降雨试验研究不同雨强条件下地表地下产流特征，从而揭示喀斯特槽谷区地表地下产流机制。结果表明：（1）喀斯特槽谷区地表地下产流受雨强影响，小雨强（30 mm/h）条件下地下产流量大于地表产流量，中雨强（60 mm/h）条件下地表产流量增大且裸坡条件下地表产流量大于地下产流量，大雨强（90 mm/h）条件下裸坡与顺层坡的地表产流量均大于地下产流量。（2）地下孔裂隙发育程度对地表地下产流量的分配比例产生影响，地下孔裂隙度越大则地下产流量越多，且2%~3%的地下孔裂隙度时地表地下产流量分配比例发生转变。（3）不同岩层倾向条件下，地表产流量及其分配比例最高为裸坡，最低为逆层坡，地下产流量及其分配比例最高为逆层坡，最低为裸坡。（4）不同岩层倾角条件下，顺层坡地表产流量最高为30°，最低为90°，地下产流量则相反；逆层坡地表产流量最高为90°，最低为60°，地下产流量最高为60°，最低为90°。研究结果可为喀斯特槽谷区地表及地下产流机制的进一步认识提供科学依据。

Abstract

Karst valley area is prone to soil and water loss during rainfall

which destroy the ecological environment of the area. This study taken the karst valley area as the research object

through indoor simulation of its typical bedding/inverse layer slope characteristics and the development degree of underground hole crack and using artificial rainfall test

the characteristics of the surface underground runoff production under different rainfall conditions were studied

thereby revealing the production mechanism of surface and underground runoff in karst valley. The results showed that: (1) The surface underground runoff yield and discharge in the karst valley area was affected by rain intensity

and the underground runoff yield and discharge was greater than the surface runoff under light rain (30 mm/h)

and the surface runoff yield and discharge increased under moderate rain (60 mm/h)

meanwhile it was greater than underground runoff under the condition of large and bare slope. Under the condition of heavy rain (90 mm/h)

the surface runoff yield and discharge were both greater than the underground runoff on bare slope and bedding slope. (2) The development degree of underground pore fissures impacted the distribution ratio of surface underground runoff yield and discharge. The larger the degree of underground pore fissure was

the greater the underground runoff yield and discharge would be

and the distribution proportion of surface underground runoff yield and discharge would change when the underground hole fissure degree was 2%~3%. (3) Under different strata tendencies

the surface runoff yield and discharge and its distribution ratio were the highest on bare slopes

and the lowest on reverse slopes

while the underground runoff yield and discharge and its distribution ratio were the highest on reverse slopes

and the lowest on bare slopes. (4) Under different strata inclination angles

the surface runoff yield and discharge was the maximum on the bedding layer of 30°

and the lowest on the bedding layer of 90°

while the underground runoff yield and discharge was opposite. For the reverse slope

the surface runoff yield and discharge was the maximum on the slope of 90°

and the minimum on the slope of 60°

the underground runoff yield and discharge was the highest on the slope of 60°

and the lowest on the slope of 90°. The results could provide scientific basis for further understanding of the production mechanism of surface and underground runoff in the karst valley area.

关键词

Keywords

references

蒋忠诚,曹建华,杨德生,等.西南岩溶石漠化区水土流失现状与综合防治对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):37-42.

Girotto E, Ceretta C A, dos Santos D R, et al. Forms of losses of copper and phosphorus in water of runoff and percolation in soil with successive pig slurry application[J].Ciência Rural,2010,40(9):1948-1954.

陈洪松,王克林.西南喀斯特山区土壤水分研究[J].农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):734-738.

游贤慧,杨琰,徐刚,等.龙潭喀斯特槽谷倾坡土壤水分变异性研究[J].山地学报,2019,37(1):53-61.

贾金田,付智勇,陈洪松,等. 喀斯特坡地基岩起伏对土壤剖面水分格局的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(6):1708-1714.

王蓉蓉,袁奇,袁鑫.含水量对顺层坡风化界面剪切特性试验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(20):243-246.

Fábio C N, Romain D, Fritz S, et al. Bedrock bedding, landsliding and erosional budgets in the Central European Alps[J].Terra Nova,2015,27(5):370-378.

Norton K P, Von Blanckenburg F, Dibiase R, et al. Cosmogenic 10Be-derived denudation rates of the Eastern and Southern European Alps[J]. International Journal of Earth Science, 2011,100:1163-1179.

刘品,袁奇,曹集仕,等.不同含水量顺层坡风化界面剩余下滑力研究及工程防护意义[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(9):286-290.

唐菡,谌芸,刘枭宏,等.喀斯特坡地拉巴豆地埂篱根及根-土复合体力学特性[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):6114-6125.

胡奕,戴全厚,王佩将.喀斯特坡耕地产流特征及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6):45-51.

彭旭东,戴全厚,李昌兰,等.模拟雨强和地下裂隙对喀斯特地区坡耕地养分流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(2):131-140.

刘前进.棕壤横垄土壤侵蚀特征及其影响因素[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2014.

Williams P W. The role of the epikarst in karst and cave hydrogeology:A review[J].International Journal of Speleology,2008,37(1):1-10.

杨宇琼,戴全厚,李昌兰,等.模拟降雨条件下喀斯特坡耕地氮磷元素地下漏失特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(3):59-67

高建平,吴桂武,黄震,等.浅析黔东地区岩溶地下水水化学特征[J].地下水,2015,37(6):22-24.

Dai Q H, Liu Z, Shao H, et al. Karst bare slope soil erosion and soil quality:A simulation case study[J].Solid Earth, 2015,6(3):985-995.

唐益群,张晓晖,周洁,等.喀斯特石漠化地区土壤地下漏失的机理研究[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(2):121-127.

孙钰霞,李林立,魏世强.喀斯特槽谷区表层喀斯特水化学的暴雨动态特征[J].山地学报,2012,30(5):513-520.

王恒松,熊康宁,张芳美.地形因子对喀斯特坡面水土流失影响的机理研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):1-7.

严友进,戴全厚,伏文兵,等.喀斯特坡地裸露心土层产流产沙模拟研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):545-557.

彭旭东,戴全厚,杨智.喀斯特山地石漠化过程中地表地下侵蚀产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1237-1248.

袁应飞,戴全厚,李昌兰,等.喀斯特典型坡耕地模拟降雨条件下的土壤侵蚀响应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):24-28.

李昌兰,戴全厚,彭旭东,等.喀斯特裸坡地地下孔(裂)隙流养分流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):19-23,114.

Zhang X B, Bai X Y, He X B. Soil creeping in the weathering crust of carbonate rocks and underground soil losses in the karst mountain areas of southwest China[J].Carbonates and Evaporites,2011,26(2):149-153.

浏览量

1018

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

喀斯特区工程堆积体坡面产流特征对降雨强度的响应

黄土坡面细沟侵蚀形态特征及横断面分异性

雨强与水土保持措施对西南植烟红壤Cu、Mo和Zn流失的影响

喀斯特槽谷区侵蚀坡面的土壤质量评价及障碍因子

模拟降雨条件下坡度和降雨强度对桂南崩积体侵蚀产沙的影响