褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化

吕刚; 贾晏泽; 刘雅卓; 陈鸿; 李海茹; 李叶鑫; 汤家喜

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化
- Periodic Variation of Water and Sediment in Rill Erosion of Cinnamon Soil and Brown Soil Sloping Farmland
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：42-48
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院,辽宁,阜新,123000
  2. 辽宁工程技术大学水土保持生态修复研究院,辽宁,阜新,123000
  3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "吕刚(1979-),男,吉林九台人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与土壤水文的教学和研究。E-mail:lvgang2637@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41501548）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.006
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吕刚, 贾晏泽, 刘雅卓, 等. 褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):42-48.

Lü Gang, JIA Yanze, LIU Yazhuo, et al. Periodic Variation of Water and Sediment in Rill Erosion of Cinnamon Soil and Brown Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(5): 42-48.
吕刚, 贾晏泽, 刘雅卓, 等. 褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):42-48. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.006.

Lü Gang, JIA Yanze, LIU Yazhuo, et al. Periodic Variation of Water and Sediment in Rill Erosion of Cinnamon Soil and Brown Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(5): 42-48. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.006.

摘要

为深入探究辽西低山丘陵区坡耕地土壤侵蚀机理，以该区的典型土壤类型褐土和棕壤为研究对象，采用室内人工降雨模拟试验，研究3种坡度（5°，10°，15°）和3种降雨强度（40，60，80 mm/h）下细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化过程。结果表明：褐土与棕壤坡面侵蚀过程可划分为3个阶段，即细沟侵蚀之前阶段、跌坎发育阶段和细沟侵蚀快速发育阶段；细沟侵蚀之前的面蚀阶段，同一坡度条件下，褐土与棕壤随雨强的增加，坡面流速呈增大趋势，而在同一雨强条件下，坡度对流速的影响并无明显规律；细沟侵蚀阶段，当坡度一定条件下，褐土与棕壤细沟内、细沟间的流速随雨强的增加而增大，当雨强一定时，褐土与棕壤随坡度的增加细沟间流速增加；细沟侵蚀阶段流速表现为细沟内流速 > 坡面流速 > 细沟间流速；细沟侵蚀快速发育阶段2种土壤产生的径流量占总径流量的80%以上，土壤侵蚀量占总侵蚀量均在70%以上，且棕壤对总体侵蚀量的贡献更稳定，更易发生细沟侵蚀。整场降雨的侵蚀方式是面蚀向细沟侵蚀的转变，坡面一旦发生侵蚀，细沟侵蚀对坡面总侵蚀的贡献更大。

Abstract

In order to further study soil erosion mechanism of sloping farmland in low mountain and hilly region of western Liaoning Province

we selected cinnamon soil and brown soil as research object

periodic variation of water and sediment in rill erosion was studied under three slopes (5°

10° and 15°) and three rainfall intensities (40

60 and 80 mm/h) by using artificial simulated rainfall system. The results showed that the erosion process of cinnamon soil and brown soil slope could be divided into three stages

which were the pre-rill erosion stage

the development of drop sill stage and the rapid development of rill erosion stage. At the surface erosion stage before rill erosion

the flow velocity of cinnamon soil and brown soil increased with the increasing of rainfall intensity under the same slope condition. However

the effect of slope on flow velocity was not obvious under the same rainfall intensity. At the rill erosion stage

the flow velocities of in and between rills of cinnamon soil and brown soil increased with the increasing of rainfall intensity under specific slope. The flow velocity between rills of cinnamon soil and brown soil increased with the increasing of slope gradient under specific rainfall intensity. At the rill erosion stage

the flow velocity followed the order of in rill > on slope > between rills. At the rapid development of rill erosion stage

the runoff of cinnamon soil and brown soil accounted for more than 80% of the total runoff

and the soil erosion accounted for more than 70% of the total erosion. The contribution of brown soil to total erosion was more stable

and rill erosion was more likely to occur. The erosion pattern of the whole rainfall was the transformation from surface erosion to rill erosion. Once slope surface erosion occurred

rill erosion contributed more to the total erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

Karamesouti M, Detsis V, Kounalaki A. Land-use and land degradation processes affecting soil resources:Evidence from traditional Mediterranean cropland(Greece)[J].Catena,2015,132:45-55.

López-Garrido R, Madejón E, León-Camacho M, et al.Reduced tillage as an alternative to no-tillage under Mediterranean conditions:A case study[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2014,140:40-47.

沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊.细沟发育与形态特征研究进展[J].生态学报,2018,38(19):6818-6825.

Zhang Q W, Lei T W, Huang X J. Quantifying the sediment transport capacity in eroding rills using a REE tracing method[J].Land Degradation & Development,2017,28(2):597-601.

吴淑芳,刘勃洋,雷琪,等.基于三维重建技术的坡面细沟侵蚀演变过程研究[J].农业工程报,2019,35(9):114-120.

和继军,吕烨,宫辉力,等.细沟侵蚀特征及其产流产沙过程试验研究[J].水利学报,2013,44(4):398-405.

吴淑芳,刘政鸿,霍云云,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀发育过程与模拟[J].土壤学报,2015,52(1):48-56.

和继军,宫辉力,李小娟,等.细沟形成对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):90-97.

肖海,刘刚,赵金凡,等.雨滴机械打击和消散作用对土壤团聚体的破坏特征[J].土壤学报,2017,54(4):827-835.

王振龙,杜明成,姜翠玲,等.基于人工降雨试验的淮北地区产流产沙差异性研究[J].水科学进展,2019,30(4):507-514.

王颢霖,焦菊英,唐柄哲,等.陕北子洲"7·26"暴雨后坡耕地细沟侵蚀及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(11):122-130.

吕刚,刘雅卓,陈鸿,等.褐土和棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀过程及侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):64-69.

葛岩,褚丽妹,张更元,等.辽西北地区旱情等级标准研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(8):115-120.

刘立权,凡胜豪,宋国献,等.辽宁省坡耕地现状与防治对策[J].中国水土保持,2015(4):15-18.

张翔,高照良,袁雪红,等.工程堆积体坡面细沟流水力学参数特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2016(4):34-40.

陈俊杰,孙莉英,蔡崇法,等.不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀差异与其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2013,50(2):281-288.

董旭,张宽地,杨明义,等.黄土坡面细沟流水动力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(3):45-51.

Wang J G, Yu B, Yang W, et al. The abrasion of soil aggregate under different artificial rough beds in over land flow[J].Catena,2017,155:183-190.

王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面发育平稳的细沟流水动力学特性[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(8):1117-1124.

王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟形态变化及其与流速之间的关系[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(11):110-117.

王友,王健,霍春平,等.基于ANSYS CFX的细沟水流切应力分析[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(9):154-160.

张攀,姚文艺,魏鹳举,等.黄丘区坡面细沟流速分布特征试验研究[J].水利学报,2017,48(11):1334-1340.

严方晨,焦菊英,曹斌挺,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区撂荒地不同演替阶段植物群落的土壤抗蚀性:以坊塌流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(1):64-72.

付玉,李光录,郑腾辉,等.雨滴击溅对耕作层土壤团聚体粒径分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(3):155-160.

刘俊体,孙莉英,张学培,等.2次降雨条件下不同土壤细沟侵蚀分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(4):22-29.

浏览量

990

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

裸露岩石对喀斯特坡地水土流失及水动力特征的影响

辽西低山丘陵区褐土和棕壤坡耕地溅蚀过程模拟

土石混合崩积体坡面细沟径流流速试验研究

黄土区空闲坡耕地地表径流产沙近似解析模型

黄土高原坡耕地土壤物理结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响