永定河典型生态护岸措施下坡面产流产沙试验研究

郑雪慧; 程金花; 祁生林; 张建; 朱慧鑫

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

永定河典型生态护岸措施下坡面产流产沙试验研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 永定河典型生态护岸措施下坡面产流产沙试验研究
- Study on Runoff and Sediment Yield on the Slope with Typical Ecological Riverbank Protection Measures in the Yongding River
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第5期页码：14-19
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 北京市水影响评价中心,北京,100071
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "郑雪慧(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:xuehui_zheng001@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项"永定河（北京段）河流廊道生态修复技术与示范"（2018ZX07101005）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郑雪慧, 程金花, 祁生林, 等. 永定河典型生态护岸措施下坡面产流产沙试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):14-19.

ZHENG Xuehui, CHENG Jinhua, QI Shenglin, et al. Study on Runoff and Sediment Yield on the Slope with Typical Ecological Riverbank Protection Measures in the Yongding River[J]. 2020, 34(5): 14-19.
郑雪慧, 程金花, 祁生林, 等. 永定河典型生态护岸措施下坡面产流产沙试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(5):14-19. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.002.

ZHENG Xuehui, CHENG Jinhua, QI Shenglin, et al. Study on Runoff and Sediment Yield on the Slope with Typical Ecological Riverbank Protection Measures in the Yongding River[J]. 2020, 34(5): 14-19. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.002.

摘要

为实现永定河北京段沙质河道生态修复，通过野外径流小区放水冲刷试验，在3种放水流量（0.5，1.0，1.5 m3/h）、坡度10°、5种护岸材料（生态袋、椰丝植生毯、三维土工网、松木桩、卵石）下分析不同生态护岸坡面的水动力学特性、产流产沙状况。结果表明：（1）3种放水流量下5种护岸材料布设坡面的平均流速均小于裸坡，5种护岸材料平均径流流速均表现为卵石 > 松木桩 > 三维土工网 > 生态袋 > 椰丝植生毯。5种生态护岸材料弗劳德数均小于1，雷诺数均小于500。（2）生态护岸措施有效减少产流，产流量随时间均呈对数显著增加，5种生态护岸材料平均径流拦截率表现为松木桩 < 卵石 < 三维土工网 < 椰丝植生毯 < 生态袋。（3）随放水流量的增大坡面产沙率增大，各生态护岸措施均能有效减少产沙量，各护岸措施的泥沙拦截效果随着放水流量增大显著降低。研究结果对永定河不同河段岸坡治理、生态护岸材料选择、永定河绿色廊道建设有重要意义，也对定量评价不同护岸材料下坡面的减水减沙效益提供参考。

Abstract

In order to realize the ecological restoration of sandy river course in Beijing section of Yongding River

through the field runoff plot drainage and scour test

the effects of different ecological riverbank protection measures on hydrodynamic characteristics

runoff and sediment yield during slope erosion process were studied. In the test

five kinds of bank protection materials (ecological bag

coir blanket

3D-geomat

pine pile and pebble) were used

and the runoff and sediment yield of each treatment were analyzed under three kinds of water discharge flow rate (0.5

1.0 and 1.5 m3/ h) and 10° slope. The results showed that: (1) Under the three release flows

the average runoff velocities of the five bank protection materials were all smaller than that of the bare slope

and the average runoff velocity of the five ecological bank protection materials followed the order of pebble > pine pile > 3D-geomat > ecological bag > coir blanket. The Froude numbers of the five ecological bank protection materials were all less than 1

and the Reynolds numbers were all less than 500. (2) Ecological riverbank protection measures could effectively intercept runoff and slow down the runoff production process

and the runoff production showed a significant logarithmic increase trend with time. The average runoff interception rate of the five ecological bank protection materials followed the order of ecological bag > coir blanket > 3D-geomat > pebble > pine pile. (3) The average sand production rate on the slope surface increased with the increasing of water discharge flow

and the ecological bank protection measures could effectively intercept the slope sand production

and the sediment interception effect of ecological bank protection material gradually decreased with the increasing of the water discharge flow. The research results were of great significance for the bank slope management of different sections of the Yongding River

the selection of ecological bank protection materials

and the construction of the green corridor of the Yongding River

and also provided a reference for the quantitative evaluation of the water and sediment reduction benefits of different bank protection materials.

关键词

Keywords

references

王越.北京永定河生态护岸综合评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.

Becker J F, Endreny T A, Robinson J D. Natural channel design impacts on reach-scale transient storage[J].Ecological Engineering,2013,57:380-392.

夏继红,严忠民.国内外城市河道生态型护岸研究现状及发展趋势[J].中国水土保持,2004(3):20-21.

顾鑫,黄浩浩.生态护岸的技术应用[J].城市道桥与防洪,2019(3):124-126.

曾子,周成,王雷光,等.基于乔灌木根系加固及柔性石笼网挡墙变形自适应的生态护坡[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2013,45(1):63-66.

刘宏远,刘亮,李秀军,等.植物纤维毯道路边坡防护技术综合效益评价[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):345-352.

涂传文.降雨条件下三维土工网垫植草护坡水力侵蚀特性试验研究[D].山东泰安:山东大学,2016.

杨渠峰,王黎.内河生态护岸发展及水力特性研究综述[J].中国水运,2016,16(3):276-278.

孙立全,吴淑芳,郭慧莉,等.人工掏挖坡面侵蚀微地貌演化及其水力学特性分析[J].水科学进展,2017,28(5):720-728.

Abrahams A D, Li G, Parsons A J. Rill hydraulics on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona[J].Earth Surface Processes and Land-Forms,2015,21(1):35-47.

Zhao C H, Gao J E, Huang Y F, et al. The contribution of astragalus adsurgens roots and canopy to watererosion control in the water-wind crisscrossed erosion region of the loess plateau[J].Land Degradation & Development,2017,28(1):265-273.

张光辉.对坡面径流挟沙力研究的几点认识[J].水科学进展,2018,29(2):151-158.

杨春霞,姚文艺,肖培青,等.植被覆盖结构对坡面产流产沙的影响及调控机制分析[J].水利学报,2019,50(9):1078-1085.

李兆松,王兵,汪建芳,等.铁杆蒿与白羊草枯落物覆盖量对黄土坡面流水动力特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(17):151-157.

刘京晶,马岚,黎俊佑,等.不同覆盖条件下坡面流水力学特征试验研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(8):115-123.

肖丛宇,程金花,姜群鸥,等.台田措施下坡面流土壤侵蚀水动力学特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):10-15.

朱慧鑫,胡晓静,程金花,等.草被覆盖下坡面流土壤侵蚀水动力学特征[J].东北农业大学学报,2018,49(7):48-57.

张建. 永定河(北京段)典型生态护岸材料和结构筛选[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.

龚杰,王越,杨鹏.几种生态护岸措施效果的研究:以北京永定河生态护岸工程为例[J].城市道桥与防洪,2016(5):137-139.

吴普特,周佩华.坡面薄层水流流动型态与侵蚀搬运方式的研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(1):19-24,39.

王广月,杜广生,王云,等.三维土工网护坡坡面流水动力学特性试验研究[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑),2015,30(4):406-411.

吴淑芳,吴普特,宋维秀,等.坡面调控措施下的水沙输出过程及减流减沙效应研究[J].水利学报,2010,41(7):870-875.

浏览量

1065

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

工程堆积体坡面侵蚀过程及水动力指标对入流形式的响应

柔性植被倒伏对地表径流水力特性及侵蚀的影响

紫色土丘陵区新改土坡面产流产沙及水动力学参数特征

凹凸棒土对土壤水分运动基本参数的影响

玉米季横垄坡面片蚀阶段产流及水动力学参数变化特征