喀斯特山区不同生态恢复模式土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征

陈忠柳; 舒英格; 周鹏鹏

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.044

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

喀斯特山区不同生态恢复模式土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 喀斯特山区不同生态恢复模式土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征
- Exchange and Distribution Characteristics of Soil Base Ions Under Different Ecological Restoration Pattern in the Karst Mountainous Area
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第4期页码：304-311
- 作者机构：
  
  贵州大学农学院,贵阳,550025
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈忠柳(1994-),女,贵州都匀人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤生态环境研究。E-mail:1078011633@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31460133）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.044
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈忠柳, 舒英格, 周鹏鹏. 喀斯特山区不同生态恢复模式土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):304-311.

CHEN Zhongliu, SHU Yingge, ZHOU Pengpeng. Exchange and Distribution Characteristics of Soil Base Ions Under Different Ecological Restoration Pattern in the Karst Mountainous Area[J]. 2020, 34(4): 304-311.
陈忠柳, 舒英格, 周鹏鹏. 喀斯特山区不同生态恢复模式土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):304-311. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.044.

CHEN Zhongliu, SHU Yingge, ZHOU Pengpeng. Exchange and Distribution Characteristics of Soil Base Ions Under Different Ecological Restoration Pattern in the Karst Mountainous Area[J]. 2020, 34(4): 304-311. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.044.

摘要

为了解喀斯特山区生态恢复模式对土壤盐基离子的交换及分布特征的影响，以喀斯特山区典型黄色石灰土为对象，研究了耕地、草地、林草间作地、退耕还草地生态恢复模式下土壤阳离子交换量（CEC）和盐基离子的分布规律。结果表明：该区土壤CEC为26.52~44.90 cmol/kg，且基本随土层深度的增加逐渐减小；各土壤层次阳离子交换量均表现为退耕还草地显著低于其他生态恢复模式（P<0.05）；在0—10，10—20 cm土层中林草间作地的CEC最高。交换性盐基离子的含量呈现出Ca2+ > Mg2+ > K+ > Na+的规律，且以Ca2+、Mg2+为主（占TEB的比例平均为91.92%，6.04%），K+、Na+所占TEB比例较低（平均为1.03%，1.01%）；盐基离子中交换性K+、Na+、Mg2+含量具有表聚性，基本随土层深度的增加而逐渐下降；不同生态恢复模式下，退耕还草地各盐基离子含量显著低于林草间作地、耕地和草地（P<0.05），但各盐基离子含量随土层深度不同存在较大差异。土壤交换性盐基总量（TEB）在剖面层次上的分布规律不明显，不同生态恢复模式土壤TEB大小顺序随着土层深度的加深有所不同，在0—10，10—20 cm土层和40—60 cm（母岩）层均表现为草地最高，退耕还草地最低。土壤盐基饱和度（BS）为42.58%~65.02%，且随土层深度的增加逐渐增大，各土壤层次BS均表现为草地 > 耕地 > 林草间作地 > 退耕还草地；相关分析表明，CEC、盐基离子含量与有机质、全氮和碱解氮均呈极显著正相关。冗余分析表明，土壤理化因子仅能解释45.3%的阳离子交换作用变化，土壤阳离子交换作用变化除了受土壤基本理化因子的影响外，还受其他因素的影响。总体而言，退耕还草地在供肥保肥和缓冲能力上显著低于其他恢复模式，土壤供肥保肥和缓冲性能在恢复初期退耕还草阶段有所下降，但随着生态恢复的进程会逐渐得到改善。

Abstract

In order to understand the influence of ecological restoration models on the exchange and distribution of soil base ions in the karst mountain area

the typical yellow rendzina was taken as study object and the effects of ecological restoration pattern

which including arable land (AL)

Grassland (GL)

the intercropping system of forest and grass (ICS)

and the grassland converted from cropland (CGL)

on the cation exchange capacity (CEC) and the exchangeable base contents were studied. The results showed that the CEC vary between 26.52 and 44.90 cmol/kg and decreased with the increase of profile depth. CEC of each soil layer was significantly lower in CGL than in ICS

and AL (P<0.05). The CEC of ICS was the highest in 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm soil layers. The size order of exchangeable base cations was Ca2+ > Mg2+ > K+ > Na+

and Ca2+

Mg2+ were the major exchangeable bases

because Ca2+

Mg2+

K+

and Na+ accounts for 91.92%

6.04%

1.03%

and 1.01% of the total content of exchangeable bases

respectively. The contents of Mg2+

K+

and Na+ were higher in the surface layer than those in deeper layers and decreased with the increase of soil depth regardless of restoration patterns. Under different ecological restoration modes

the content of each base ion in CGL was significantly lower than in ICS

Al and GL (P<0.05)

but the content of each base ion varied with the soil depth. The distribution rule of soil total exchangeable base (TEB) was not obvious at the soil depth. The order of soil TEB in different ecological restoration modes was different with the increase of profile depth

in 0—10 cm

10—20 cm soil layer

and 40-60 cm (mother rock) layer

GL was the highest and CGL was the lowest. The soil base saturation (BS) in this area changed between 42.58% and 65.02% and gradually increased with the increase of soil depth. BS were the largest in GL

and followed by those in AL

ICS

and CGL. Correlation analysis showed that CEC

base ion content and organic matter

total nitrogen and alkaline nitrogen were all significantly and positively correlated. Redundancy analysis (RDA) shows that soil physical and chemical factors could only explain 45.3% of the changes in cation exchange. The changes in soil cation exchange were affected by other factors besides the basic physical and chemical factors. In general

CGL was significantly lower than other recovery models in the ability of fertilizer supply and buffer and GL had better performance. In the early stage of restoration

the soil fertility and buffer capacity decreased

but it will be improved gradually with the process of ecological restoration.

关键词

Keywords

references

聂三安,葛体达,肖和艾,等.不同栽培管理方式下土壤交换性盐基特征差异分析[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1064-1069.

Ahmad G, Ahmad G, Baratali F, et al. Effect of different fertilizer resources on yield and yield components of grain maize (

Zea mays

L.) affected by tillage managements[J],2016,7(4):499-512.

樊亚男,姚利鹏,瞿明凯,等.基于产量的稻田肥力质量评价及障碍因子区划:以进贤县为例[J].土壤学报,2017,54(5):1157-1169.

苏有健,王烨军,张永利,等.不同植茶年限茶园土壤pH缓冲容量[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):2914-2918.

陈鹏,郭建英,董智,等.砒砂岩区不同退耕还林措施土壤颗粒及交换性能分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):43-50.

温军,王晓丽,王彦龙.长江源区3种地形高寒草地土壤阳离子交换量和交换性盐基离子的分布特征及其机理探讨[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(3):488-497.

田圣贤,冯盼,杨山,等.东北阔叶红松林腐殖质层土壤阳离子交换性能及其主要影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(9):2549-2558.

姜林,耿增超,李珊珊,等.祁连山西水林区土壤阳离子交换量及盐基离子的剖面分布[J].生态学报,2012,32(11):3368-3377.

王文艳,张丽萍,刘俏.黄土高原小流域土壤阳离子交换量分布特征及影响因子[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):123-127.

张玉革,梁文举,姜勇.不同利用方式下潮棕壤交换性钙镁的剖面分布[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(4):813-818.

You H Y. Orienting rocky desertification towards sustainable land use:An advanced remote sensing tool to guide the conservation policy[J].Land Use Policy,2017,61(2):171-184.

李建存,涂杰楠,童立强,等.贵州岩溶石漠化20年演变特征与影响因素分析[J].国土资源遥感,2013,25(4):133-137.

李静鹏,徐明锋,苏志尧,等.不同植被恢复类型的土壤肥力质量评价[J].生态学报,2014,34(9):2297-2307.

彭文君,舒英格.典型石漠化地区土地覆被变化对生态环境的影响:以贵州省晴隆县为例[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(14):200-206.

肖盛杨,舒英格,陈梦军.喀斯特高原峡谷区不同植被类型的土壤抗蚀性[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):30-35,81.

何秀,文小琴,舒英格,等.喀斯特石漠化区土地利用方式对土壤质量性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(9):234-238.

卢立华,农友,李华,等.植被恢复模式对石漠化生态系统碳储量的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):1-8.

彭文君,舒英格.喀斯特山区县域耕地景观生态安全及演变过程[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):852-865.

邓如露,李顺会,王媛,等.晴隆县茶叶种植气候条件分析[J].南方农业,2019,13(19):83-85.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

龙健,邓启琼,江新荣,等.西南喀斯特地区退耕还林(草)模式对土壤肥力质量演变的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1279-1284.

李静鹏,徐明锋,苏志尧,等.不同植被恢复类型的土壤肥力质量评价[J].生态学报,2014,34(9):2297-2307.

魏孝荣,邵明安.黄土高原小流域土壤pH、阳离子交换量和有机质分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(11):2710-2715.

文小琴,舒英格,何欢.喀斯特山区土地不同利用方式的土壤养分及微生物特征[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(6):1227-1233.

Esteban G J, Robert B J. The distribution of soil nutrients with depth: Global patterns and the imprint of plants[J].Biogeochemistry,2001,53(1):51-77.

Ernst L, Subhadip G, Marcus D, et al. Distribution of nutrients and trace elements in forest soils of Singapore[J].Chemosphere,2019,222:62-70.

秦川,何丙辉,刘永鑫,等.生物埂护坡上黄花根系分布特征及其对土壤养分的影响[J].草业学报,2013,22(5):256-264.

黄绍文,金继运,杨俐苹,等.粮田土壤磷、钾养分的垂直分布特征[J].土壤肥料,2001(4):8-12.

Yao Y F, Shao M G, Fu X L, et al. Effects of shrubs on soil nutrients and enzymatic activities over a 0—100 cm soil profile in the desert-loess transition zone[J].Catena,2019,174:362-370.

刘方明,孟凡祥,梁文举,等.科尔沁退化草地改良的工程措施及效果[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2005,24(增刊2):257-259.

汪文强,王子芳,高明,等.施氮对紫色土交换性酸及盐基饱和度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):138-142.

姜勇,张玉革,梁文举.温室蔬菜栽培对土壤交换性盐基离子组成的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):78-81.

浏览量

899

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

紫色土坡耕地磁化率剖面分布特征及主控因素

喀斯特地质高背景区浅层裂隙土壤Cd剖面分布规律及其影响因素

六道沟小流域地形序列土壤碳剖面分布特征及影响因素

控释尿素减施对双季稻田土壤剖面养分分布特征的影响

北京山区典型植被类型土壤饱和导水率及其影响因素