改性尿素追施对冬小麦和夏玉米季氮素挥发和淋溶的影响

肖强; 李丽霞; 李鸿雁; 衣文平; 邹国元; 刘建斌; 孙世友

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

改性尿素追施对冬小麦和夏玉米季氮素挥发和淋溶的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 改性尿素追施对冬小麦和夏玉米季氮素挥发和淋溶的影响
- Effects of Modified Urea Topdressing on Nitrogen Volatilization and Leaching in Winter Wheat and Summer Maize
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第4期页码：270-279
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京市农林科学院植物营养与资源研究所,北京,100097
  2. 北京市缓控释肥料工程技术研究中心,北京,100097
  3. 河北省农林科学院农业资源环境研究所,石家庄,050051
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "肖强(1978-),男,副研究员,主要从事新型肥料研究。E-mail:xqiang1978@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFD0800604）北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项（KJCX20200418）国家玉米产业技术体系任务项目（CARS-02-88）河北省农林科学院创新工程项目（2019-1-03）河北省重点研究计划项目（20323601D）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.040
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
肖强, 李丽霞, 李鸿雁, 等. 改性尿素追施对冬小麦和夏玉米季氮素挥发和淋溶的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):270-279.

XIAO Qiang, LI Lixia, LI Hongyan, et al. Effects of Modified Urea Topdressing on Nitrogen Volatilization and Leaching in Winter Wheat and Summer Maize[J]. 2020, 34(4): 270-279.
肖强, 李丽霞, 李鸿雁, 等. 改性尿素追施对冬小麦和夏玉米季氮素挥发和淋溶的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):270-279. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.040.

XIAO Qiang, LI Lixia, LI Hongyan, et al. Effects of Modified Urea Topdressing on Nitrogen Volatilization and Leaching in Winter Wheat and Summer Maize[J]. 2020, 34(4): 270-279. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.040.

摘要

以NBPT（N-丁基硫代磷酰三胺）和DMPP（3，4－二甲基吡唑磷酸盐）为复合抑制剂，利用转鼓喷涂工艺，开发出新型复合型抑制剂涂覆尿素肥料，采用扫描电镜和能谱仪分析其涂覆效果。通过田间试验系统对比评价了追施不同氮肥对调控氮素的特征效果。试验设置5个处理：（1）不施氮肥（CK）；（2）农民习惯追施尿素（CU）；（3）优化追施尿素（CUU）；（4）优化追施抑制剂涂覆尿素（CUY1）；（5）优化追施抑制剂涂覆尿素（CUY2）。在夏玉米喇叭口期、冬小麦拔节期追施氮肥后的15天内进行田间原位连续动态观测。电镜和能谱结果表明，复合抑制剂均匀涂覆于尿素表面，形成薄而致密、光滑的涂覆层，该涂覆层均匀分布有磷和硫2种元素，表明复合抑制剂与尿素已有效结合。田间试验结果表明，在同等优化施氮量下与普通尿素相比，夏玉米和冬小麦季追肥后CUY1和CUY2处理氨挥发分别降低55.19%，32.15%和52.46%，39.43%。夏玉米季追肥后，0-20 cm土层CU、CUU处理土壤硝态氮含量于第5天达到峰值，到后期已显著低于CUY1、CUY2处理，CUY2处理稳定硝态氮的效果更好。冬小麦季追肥后，0-20 cm土壤硝态氮含量CU、CUU处理分别在第5，3天达到峰值，CUY1、CUY2处理于第11天达到峰值后，硝态氮含量已显著高于相同施氮量的CUU处理。在保证产量和净收益的同时，抑制剂涂覆尿素显著降低了追施氮素的氨挥发和淋溶损失浓度，其中冬小麦季CUY1处济效益较好，夏玉米季CUY2调控氮素的效果最佳，减少向下淋溶的效果明显。

Abstract

NBPT (n-butyl thiophosphoryltriamide) and DMPP (3

4-dimethylpyrazolphosphate) were used as composite inhibitors. By optimizing the combination and using the drum spray process

a new type of composite inhibitor coated urea fertilizer was developed. The effect of coating was analyzed by SEM and EDS. Field experiments were conducted to systematically evaluate the effects of different nitrogen topdressing on nitrogen regulation. Five treatments were set up: (1) No N application (CK); (2) farmers’ habit of applying urea (CU); (3) optimization of applying urea (CUU); (4) optimization of applying inhibitor coated urea (CUY1); (5) optimization of applying inhibitor coated urea (CUY2). The field in-situ continuous dynamic observation was carried out within 15 days after applying urea at the ten leaf stage of summer maize and jointing stage of winter wheat. The composite inhibitor was uniformly coated on the surface of urea to form a thin

compact and smooth coating layer. The coating layer was evenly distributed with phosphorus and sulfur elements

which indicated that the composite inhibitor and urea had effectively combined. Compared with the common urea after the same N application

the ammonia volatilization of CUY1 and CUY2 in summer maize and winter wheat decreased by 55.19%

32.15% and 52.46%

39.43% respectively. After topdressing in summer maize season

the content of soil NO3--N in 0-20 cm soil lager in CU and CUU treatment reached the peak value at the 5th day

which was significantly higher than that of CUY1 and CUY2 treatment at the same period

and significantly lower than that of CUY1 and CUY2 treatment at the later stage. According to the trend of CUY1 treatment

the effect of CUY2 treatment on stabilizing NO3--N in 0-20 cm soil layer is better. After topdressing in winter wheat season

the content of soil NO3--N in CU and CUU treatment reached the peak value on the 5th and 3rd day

respectively. The content of soil NO3--N in CUY1 and CUY2 treatment increased slowly

and reached the peak value on the 11th day

which was 38.64%

36.08% and 43.65%

48.19% respectively lower than that of CU and CUU treatment. After the 11th day

the content of NO3--N was significantly higher than that of CUU with the same N application. At the same time of ensuring the yield and net income

urea coated with inhibitor significantly reduced the ammonia volatilization and leaching loss concentration of nitrogen

among which CUY1 treatment on winter wheat had better economic benefit

CUY2 on summer maize had the best effect of regulating nitrogen

and the effect of reducing leaching down was obvious.

关键词

Keywords

references

巨晓棠,谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(4):783-795.

Huang J K,Xiang C,Jia X,et al.Impacts of training on farmers' nitrogen use in maize production in Shandong,China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.,2012,67(4):321-327.

张运红,姚健,宝德俊,等. 尿素硝酸铵溶液对玉米产量、品质及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2018,20(9):113-121.

徐钰,刘兆辉,张建军,等. 不同氮肥管理措施对华北地区夏玉米田增产减排的效果分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2018(1):9-15.

于飞,施卫明. 近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(6):1311-1324.

杨岩,谭德水,江丽华,等. 黄淮海夏玉米一次性施肥技术效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3909-3919.

张翀,韩晓阳,李雪倩,等. 川中丘陵区紫色土冬小麦/夏玉米轮作氨挥发研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2015,23(11):1359-1366.

庄振东. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系氮肥去向及平衡状况研究[D]. 山东泰安:山东农业大学,2016.

王少杰. 黄土高原旱作覆膜玉米不同时期施氮效果及气态氮损失[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2016.

Morán M,Ferreira J,Martins H,et al. Ammonia agriculture emissions:From EMEP to a high resolution inventory[J].Atmospheric Pollution Research,2016,7(5):786-798.

王长军,李凤霞,谭松伟,等.硝化/脲酶抑制剂对宁夏灌淤土土壤氮含量及其转化的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(21):285-289.

武志杰,石元亮,李东坡,等. 稳定性肥料发展与展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1614-1621.

王静,王允青,张凤芝,等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂对沿淮平原水稻产量、氮肥利用率及稻田氮素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(5):211-216.

刘红江,殷跃军,郭智. 硝化抑制剂对小麦产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(2):443-449.

李莉,李东坡,武志杰,等.脲酶/硝化抑制剂对尿素氮在白浆土中转化的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(3):646-650.

李欠欠. 脲酶抑制剂LIMUS对我国农田氨减排及作物产量和氮素利用的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014.

山楠. 京郊小麦-玉米轮作体系氮素利用与损失研究[D]. 河北保定:河北农业大学,2014.

刘敏,张翀,何彦芳,等. 追氮方式对夏玉米土壤N

O和NH

排放的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(1):19-29.

Afshar R K, Lin R Y,Mohammed Y A,et al. Agronomic effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization in a dryland farming system:Field and laboratory investigation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,172:4130-4139.

沈真实,许超,汤海涛,等. DMPP施用的环境效应、影响因素及其机理研究[J]. 湖南农业科学,2011(8):71-76.

Menéndez S,Barrena I,Setien I,et al. Efficiency of nitrification inhibitor DMPP to reduce nitrous oxide emissions under different temperature and moisture conditions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,53:82-89.

Chen D L,Suter H C,Islam A,et al. Influence of nitrification inhibitors on nitrification and nitrous oxide (N

O) emission from a clay loam soil fertilized with urea[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2010,42:660-664.

俞巧钢,殷建祯,马军伟,等. 硝化抑制剂DMPP应用研究进展及其影响因素[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2014,33(6):1057-1066.

Chaves B, Opoku A, Neve S D, et al. Influence of DCD and DMPP on soil N dynamic after incorporation of vegetable crop residues[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2006,43:62-68.

Liu S L,Wang X H,Yin X H,et al. Ammonia volatilization loss and corn nitrogen nutrition and productivity with efficiency enhanced uan and urea under no-tillage[J]. Scientific Reports,2019,9:6610.

浏览量

1001

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

添加木质素和生物炭对土壤氮、磷养分及水分损失的影响

生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂及秸秆覆盖对红壤茶园氮磷淋失影响

田间条件下氮的矿化及硝态氮淋溶研究

控/缓释肥料减少氨挥发和氮淋溶的效果研究

模拟酸雨对荔枝园土壤氮素迁移和土壤酸化的影响