1. 河西学院土木工程学院, 河西走廊水资源保护利用研究所,甘肃,张掖,734000
2. 甘肃农业大学水利水电工程学院,兰州,730070
3. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州,730000
[ "邓浩亮(1988-),男,甘肃华亭人,博士,副教授,主要从事旱区作物高效节水研究。E-mail:denghaoliang521@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
邓浩亮, 张恒嘉, 肖让, 等. 膜下滴灌调亏在提升河西绿洲洋葱产量及品质的应用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):201-208.
DENG Haoliang, ZHANG Hengjia, XIAO Rang, et al. Application of Mulched Drip Irrigation Under Water Deficit in Improving the Productivity and Quality of Onion in Hexi Corridor[J]. 2020, 34(4): 201-208.
邓浩亮, 张恒嘉, 肖让, 等. 膜下滴灌调亏在提升河西绿洲洋葱产量及品质的应用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):201-208. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.030.
DENG Haoliang, ZHANG Hengjia, XIAO Rang, et al. Application of Mulched Drip Irrigation Under Water Deficit in Improving the Productivity and Quality of Onion in Hexi Corridor[J]. 2020, 34(4): 201-208. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.030.
为探究膜下滴灌调亏对河西绿洲洋葱品质和产量的影响,以"红宝903"洋葱为试验材料,采用不同生育期和不同梯度调亏灌溉方式二因素随机区组试验设计,共9个处理。在每个生育期测定洋葱光合参数,收获后测定洋葱产量及品质。结果表明:(1)发叶和鳞茎膨大期水分亏缺显著降低了洋葱叶片净光合速率、蒸腾速率和胞间CO2浓度,且降幅随水分亏缺程度加大而增大。(2)水分亏缺造成洋葱产量不同幅度降低,调亏处理中成熟期轻度水分亏缺产量最高(47 940 kg/hm2),其次为苗期轻度水分亏缺(46 521 kg/hm2),分别较充分灌溉降低5.93%和8.71%(P>0.05)。(3)苗期轻度水分亏缺灌溉水利用效率最高(58.84 kg/m3),成熟期轻度水分亏缺次之(52.60 kg/m3),分别较充分灌溉显著提高36.14%和21.70%(P<0.05)。(4)苗期轻度水分调亏处理的洋葱综合品质最佳,其紧实度、洋葱油、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白、维生素C和丙酮酸含量较生育期充分灌溉提高3.06%,2.50%,10.40%,17.57%,4.35%和6.06%。因此,综合考虑产量、水分生产效率、产值及果实品质等指标,通过运用主成分分析法进行综合评价,表明洋葱最佳水分调控处理为苗期轻度水分胁迫,即在苗期保持土壤相对含水率70%~75%、其余生育期土壤相对含水率为80%~85%。该研究可为实现河西走廊绿洲灌区洋葱高效节水栽培和产业化发展提供理论与技术参考。
To uncover the effect of mulched drip irrigation under water deficit on the yield and quality of onion in Hexi corridor
a field experiment was conducted taking "Hongbao 903" as study object. The experimental employed a two-factor randomized blocks design of mulched drip irrigation with different water deficit gradients in growth periods
which included nine treatments totally. Onion photosynthetic parameters in every growth period were measured
and the onion productivity and quality were determined after harvest. Results showed that: (1) Water deficiency (WD) in the development and bulbification stages obviously decreased net photosynthetic rate
transpiration rate and intercellular CO2concentration
and the reduction increased with the raise of water deficiency. (2) WD decreased yield in different degree. Slight water deficit in ripening stage was the highest (47 940 kg/hm2)
secondly in the establishment satge (46 521 kg/hm2)
of which decreased by 5.93% and 8.71% (P>0.05) respectively compared with full irrigation. (3) Slight water deficit in the establishment period gave the highest irrigation efficiency (58.84 kg/m3)
secondly in ripening stage (52.60 kg/m3)
of which increased by 36.14% and 21.70% respectively compared with full irrigation. (4) The onion quality was the best under the treatments of slight water deficit in the establishment stage
indicated by the increased compactness
onion oil
soluble sugar
soluble protein
vitamin C and pyruvic acid
by 3.06%
2.50%
10.40%
17.57%
4.35% and 6.06% respectively
compared with full irrigation. Taking the productivity
water product efficiency
output value and fruits quality
etc. altogether
the principal component analysis was used for comprehensive evaluation. The slight water deficit in the establishment stage was an ideal stage for soil moisture regulation. There lative soil water content should be kept around 70%~75% in the establishment stage
and 80%~85% in others. These results could provide the theoretical and technical references for the water saving planting ofonion and its industrialization development.
赵靖,宋述尧,韩玉珠,等.分蘖洋葱和普通洋葱营养品质的比较[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(1):106-110.
唐利华.调亏灌溉下滴灌甜菜耗水特征及水分生产函数研究[D].新疆:石河子大学,2019.
姜良超,仝川,胡敏杰,等.河套灌区玉米光合特征及产量对全膜覆盖下不同滴灌量的响应[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):289-297.
张恒嘉,李晶.绿洲膜下滴灌调亏马铃薯光合生理特性与水分利用[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(10):143-151.
王玉才,张恒嘉,邓浩亮,等.调亏灌溉对菘蓝水分利用及产量的影响[J].植物学报,2018,53(3):322-333.
李昭楠,李唯,姜有虎,等.西北干旱区戈壁葡萄膜下滴灌需水量和灌溉制度[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):249-253.
郑建华,黄冠华,黄权中,等.干旱区膜下滴灌条件下洋葱水分生产函数与优化灌溉制度[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(8):25-30.
刘静,成自勇,安飞虎.民勤沙漠绿洲膜下滴灌洋葱灌溉试验研究初探[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(6):55-59.
丁林,金彦兆,王文娟,等.民勤绿洲膜下滴灌洋葱节水高产灌溉制度[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(4):46-54.
李斌.疏勒河流域洋葱膜下滴灌耗水规律及灌溉过程控制研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(12):7-12.
赵锴,李瑾,徐宁,等.氮磷钾配施对洋葱产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(3):558-563.
刘小飞,费良军,段爱旺,等.调亏灌溉对冬小麦产量和品质及其关系的调控效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):276-282.
高佳,张恒嘉,巴玉春,等.调亏灌溉对绿洲灌区膜下滴灌辣椒生长发育和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(2):25-31.
王玉才.河西绿洲菘蓝水分高效利用及调亏灌溉模式优化研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2018.
符崇梅,魏野畴,李娟,等.不同灌溉量、滴灌频率及水肥耦合对洋葱产量和水分利用率的影响[J].节水灌溉,2011(8):36-39.
Ennahli S, Earl H J E. Physiological limitations to photosynthetic carbon assimilation in cotton under water stress[J].Crop Science,2005,45(6):2374-2382.
Lawlor D W, Cornic G. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants[J].Plant Cell and Environment,2002,25(2):275-294.
Yin C Y, Berninger F, Li C Y. Photosynthetic responses of
Populus przewalski
subjected to drought stress[J].Photosynthetica,2006,44(1):62-68.
Reddy A R, Chaitanya K V, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,161(11):1189-1202.
郭仁松,林涛,田立文,等.调亏灌溉对海岛棉花铃期光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(2):130-134.
邓浩亮,张恒嘉,李福强,等.河西绿洲菘蓝生长、光合特性及品质对膜下滴灌调亏的响应[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):321-327.
安玉艳,梁宗锁.植物应对干旱胁迫的阶段性策略[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(10):2907-2915.
张建忠,朱强根.水分胁迫对夏玉米胞间CO
2
浓度、维管束鞘细胞CO
2
泄漏和叶片碳稳定同位素的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(6):1040-1049.
Juan E, Bob W, John J, et al. Onion yield and quality response to two irrigation scheduling strategies[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2009,120(3):301-305.
Pelter G Q, Mittelstadt R, Leib B G, et al. Effects of water stress at specific growth stages on onion bulb yield and quality[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 68(2):107-115.
Bekele S, Tilahun K. Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia[J].Agricultural Water Management,2007,89(1):148-152.
Du T S, Kang S Z, Zhang J H, et al. Water use efficiency and fruit quality of table grape under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation[J].Agricultural Water Management,2008,95(6):659-668.
Zayton A M. Effect of soil-water stress on onion yield and quality in sandy soil[J].Misr Journal of Agricultural Angineering,2007,24(1):141-160.
0
浏览量
795
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621