土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响

叶青; 史东梅; 曾小英; 司承静; 江娜; 张健乐

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响
- Effects of Soil Management Measures for the Quality of Eroded Cultivated-layer in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第4期页码：164-170
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
  2. 重庆市林业科学研究院,重庆,400036
  3. 重庆市万州区水利局,重庆,404000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "叶青(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:ye01qing@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41771310）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.025
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
叶青, 史东梅, 曾小英, 等. 土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):164-170.

YE Qing, SHI Dongmei, ZENG Xiaoying, et al. Effects of Soil Management Measures for the Quality of Eroded Cultivated-layer in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(4): 164-170.
叶青, 史东梅, 曾小英, 等. 土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):164-170. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.025.

YE Qing, SHI Dongmei, ZENG Xiaoying, et al. Effects of Soil Management Measures for the Quality of Eroded Cultivated-layer in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(4): 164-170. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.025.

摘要

紫色土坡耕地是我国西南地区重要的耕地类型，为了探讨土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量的影响，以紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤为研究对象，采用铲土侵蚀模拟试验小区，建立不同侵蚀程度（侵蚀年限）的坡耕地定位试验，以不施肥为对照（CK），设置了化肥管理措施（F）、生物炭+化肥管理措施（B+F），对比分析土壤管理措施对土壤理化性质及力学性能影响，采用土壤质量指数法分析紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量变化特征。对3种土壤管理条件下坡耕地耕层质量及恢复作用进行评价。结果表明：（1）土壤管理措施对紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层土壤理化性质影响差异显著。F管理措施不能改善土壤结构，但能提高土壤养分，B+F管理措施耕层土壤容重最小，土壤总孔隙、毛管孔隙及饱和含水量增加，有机质含量最高，为12.45 g/kg，土壤养分状况最好。（2）F和B+F 2种管理措施均能提高0—10 cm土层抗剪强度，使得表层土壤抵抗剪切破坏能力增强，有利于水土流失调控，2种管理措施下土壤贯入阻力下降，能有效促进作物根系生长发育。（3）2种管理措施对紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤质量均有恢复作用，土壤质量指数依次为B+F（0.686）、F（0.625）、CK（0.595），B+F管理措施土壤质量较对照CK（0.595）提升15.3%，较F（0.625）提升9.8%，B+F管理措施对坡耕地侵蚀耕层土壤质量恢复效果最好，能有效提高紫色土坡耕地侵蚀耕层作物产量。B+F管理措施能有效改善土壤结构，增加土壤养分含量，更适合紫色坡耕地侵蚀耕层质量恢复及土壤侵蚀防治，研究结果可为紫色土坡耕地侵蚀性耕层质量恢复提供适宜管理措施，对紫色土坡耕地持续利用具有重要意义。

Abstract

Purple soil sloping farmland is an important cultivated land resource in southwest China. In order to explore the influence of soil management measures on the quality of eroded arable cultivated-layer of purple soil sloping farmland

the purple soil sloping farmland cultivated-layer soil is used as the research object

the soil erosion simulation plot was used to establish different erosion degree (erosion years) of sloping farmland location test

fertilizer management measure (F) and chemical fertilizer + biochar management measure (F + B) are set up

taking no fertilizer as a control (CK).Soil quality index method is used to analyze and evaluate the quality recovery effect of eroded cultivated-layer on purple soil sloping farmland and characteristics of indicator change with different management measures. Results show: (1) The effects of the two management measures on the physical and chemical properties of the soil cultivated-layer of purple soil sloping farmland were significant. F management measure can not improve soil structure

but can improve soil nutrient. Under B+F management measure

soil bulk density is minimal

soil total pores

capillary pores and saturated water content increase

and organic matter content is the highest

12.45 g/kg. Soil nutrient status is best. (2) Both F and B+F management measures can improve the shear strength of 0-10 cm soil layer

which makes the surface soil resist shear failure

which is conducive to soil erosion control

and the soil penetration resistance decreases under the other two management measures. Promote the growth and development of crop roots. (3) The two management measures improved the soil quality of the cultivated-layer of purple soil sloping farmland. The soil quality index was B+F (0.686)

F(0.625) and CK(0.595)

and the soil quality of B+F management measure was higher. Compared with CK (0.595)

it increased by 15.3%

which was 9.8% higher than F (0.625). B+F management measure had the best effect on soil quality improvement of sloping farmland. B+F management measures can effectively improve soil structure and increase soil nutrient content

which is more suitable for quality restoration of cultivated-layer and soil erosion control in purple sloping farmland. The research results can provide suitable management measures for quality restoration of eroded cultivated-layer in purple soil sloping farmland. It is of great significance for the sustainable use of purple soil sloping farmland.

关键词

Keywords

references

赵燮京,刘定辉.四川紫色丘陵区旱作农业的土壤管理与水土保持[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(5):6-10.

Zhang J H, Ni S J, Su Z A. Dual roles of tillage erosion in lateral SOC movement in the landscape[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2012,63(2):165-176.

史东梅.基于RUSLE模型的紫色丘陵区坡耕地水土保持研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):39-44,251.

韩晓增,邹文秀,陆欣春,等.旱作土壤耕层及其肥力培育途径[J].土壤与作物,2015,4(4):145-150.

董杰,张重阳,罗丽丽,等.三峡库区紫色土坡地土壤粗骨沙化和酸化特征[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(6):31-34.

Masto R E, Chhonkar P K, Singh D, et al. Alternative soil quality indices for evaluating the effect of intensive cropping, fertilization and manuring for 31 years in the semi-arid soils of India[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2008,136:419-435.

张旭辉,李治玲,李勇,等.施用生物炭对西南地区紫色土和黄壤的作用效果[J].草业学报,2017,26(4):63-72.

吕波,王宇函,夏浩,等.不同改良剂对黄棕壤和红壤上白菜生长及土壤肥力影响的差异[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(22):4306-4315.

吴昱,刘慧,杨爱峥,等.黑土区坡耕地施加生物炭对水土流失的影响[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(5):287-294.

吴媛媛,杨明义,张风宝,等.施加生物炭对黄绵土耕层土壤可蚀性的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(1):81-92.

Liu X H, Han F P, Zhang X C. Effect of biochar on soil aggregates in the Loess Plateau:Results from incubation experiments[J].International Journal of Agriculture and Biology,2012,14(6):975-979.

Haider G, Steffens D, Moser G, et al. Biochar reduced nitrate leaching and improved soil moisture content without yield improvements in a four-year field study[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2017,237:80-94.

Major J, Rondon M, MolinaA D, et al. Maize yield and nutrition during four years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol[J].Plant and Soil,2010,333(1/2):117-128.

魏永霞,王鹤,刘慧,等.生物炭对坡耕地土壤肥力和大豆产量的影响与预测[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(7):302-312.

史东梅,蒋光毅,蒋平,等.土壤侵蚀因素对紫色丘陵区坡耕地耕层质量影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(13):270-279.

王志强,刘宝元,王旭艳,等.东北黑土区土壤侵蚀对土地生产力影响试验研究[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2009,39(10):1397-1412.

赵红,孙滨峰,逯非,等.Meta分析生物质炭对中国主粮作物痕量温室气体排放的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(19):10-16.

中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.

Xu M X, Li Q, Wilson G. Degradation of soil physicochemical quality by ephemeral gully erosion on sloping cropland of the hilly Loess Plateau[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,155:9-18.

侯西勇,孙希华.土地资源生产力评价及粮食生产潜力估算:以长清县为例[J].地球信息科学,2001,3(2):60-65.

王红兰,唐翔宇,张维,等.施用生物炭对紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤水力学性质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(4):107-112.

Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2002,35(4):219-230.

Li Y Y, Zhang F B, Yang M Y, et al. Effects of adding biochar of different particle sizes on hydro-erosional processes in small scale laboratory rainfall experiments on cultivated loessial soil[J].Catena,2019,173:226-233.

张祥,王典,姜存仓,等.生物炭对我国南方红壤和黄棕壤理化性质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(8):979-984.

Gul S, Whalen J K. Biochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biochar-amended soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,103:1-15.

浏览量

999

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

川西高山峡谷区不同种植模式坡面微地形变化及其对细沟发育的响应

等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤质量的改良效果评价

等高犁耕对黄土坡耕地坡形与坡度的影响

基于梯度提升树模型的坡耕地土壤水蚀模拟与分析

不同耕作方式对豫西旱区坡耕地水肥利用与流失的影响