1. 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室(西安理工大学),西安,710048
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "刘阳(1994-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事农业水土资源与生态环境研究。E-mail:2283312734@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
刘阳, 王全九, 缑丽娜, 等. 透气隔水埋体对土壤水分入渗与溶质运移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):152-157.
LIU Yang, WANG Quanjiu, GOU Lina, et al. Effect of Air-Permeable and Water-Proof Buried Body on Soil Water Infiltration and Solute Transport[J]. 2020, 34(4): 152-157.
刘阳, 王全九, 缑丽娜, 等. 透气隔水埋体对土壤水分入渗与溶质运移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):152-157. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.023.
LIU Yang, WANG Quanjiu, GOU Lina, et al. Effect of Air-Permeable and Water-Proof Buried Body on Soil Water Infiltration and Solute Transport[J]. 2020, 34(4): 152-157. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.023.
为分析透气隔水(弱透水)埋体促进水分入渗与溶质运移功效,开展了不同容重(1.40,1.45,1.50,1.60 g/cm3)透气隔水(弱透水)埋体的一维垂直土柱入渗试验,分析了不同容重的透气隔水(弱透水)埋体对土壤水分入渗与溶质分布的影响。结果表明,透气隔水(弱透水)埋体能够增加土壤累积入渗量,推动湿润锋运移,在一定范围内,随着透气隔水(弱透水)埋体容重增加,湿润锋推进速度与土壤入渗率均增加。600 min时,土壤累积入渗量相对增加7.42%~29.17%,湿润锋深度达到27 cm,入渗时间相对减少26.97%~64.27%。相比于对照组,不同容重的透气隔水(弱透水)埋体均能降低溶质向深层土壤迁移数量。Philip模型和代数模型均能描述透气隔水(弱透水)埋体土壤水分入渗过程,且Philip模型中吸渗率S和代数模型中综合形状系数α均与透气隔水(弱透水)埋体内外容重比呈正相关关系。研究结果表明透气隔水(弱透水)埋体能够通过改变上层土壤吸力分布提高水分入渗能力与溶质传输效率,实现对城市雨水径流调控和净化。
In order to analyze the effect of air-permeable and water-proof soil on water infiltration and solute transport
an one-dimensional vertical soil column infiltration test was carried out with different bulk densities (1.40
1.45
1.50
1.60 g/cm3). The results showed that the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body could increase the cumulative infiltration of soil and promote the migration of wetting front. In a certain range
with the increases of the bulk densities of the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body
both the infiltration rate and the migration rate of wetting front increased. When the infiltration time was 600 min
the cumulative infiltration of soil increased by 7.42%~29.17%
and the depth of wetting front reached 27 cm. The infiltration time decreased by 26.97%~64.27% correspondingly. Compared with the control group
the amount of solute migration to the deep soil was reduced by different bulk densities of the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body. Both Philip model and algebraic model could describe the infiltration process of soil water in the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body
and the permeability s in Philip model and the comprehensive shape coefficient α in the algebraic model were positively correlated with the volume weight ratio and the volume weight ratio inside and outside the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body. The results showed that the air-permeable and water-proof (weak permeable) buried body could improve the water infiltration capacity and solute transport by changing the suction distribution of the upper soil
and realize the regulation and purification of urban rainwater runoff.
郭斌,任志远.西安城区土地利用与生态安全动态变化[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(1):71-75.
王和意.上海城市降雨径流污染过程及管理措施研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2005.
Hsieh C, Davis A P. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2005,131(11):1521-1531.
王梓墉.基于海绵城市理念的城市内涝防治研究[J].价值工程,2019,38(23):157-159.
崔广柏,张其成,湛忠宇,等.海绵城市建设研究进展与若干问题探讨[J].水资源保护,2016,32(2):1-4.
任韶华.现代城市内涝频发下的防涝体系及防涝设施规划研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
李毅,邵明安.人工草地覆盖条件下降雨入渗影响因素的实验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(3):18-23.
廖朝轩,高爱国,黄恩浩.国外雨水管理对我国海绵城市建设的启示[J].水资源保护,2016,32(1):42-45,50.
石磊,樊瀞琳,柳思勉,等.国外雨洪管理对我国海绵城市建设的启示:以日本为例[J].环境保护,2019,47(16):59-65.
National Research Council. Urban stormwater management in the United States[M]. USA:National Academies Press,2009.
Liaw C H, Tsai Y L, Cheng M S. Hydrologic analysis of distributed small-scale stormwater control systems[J].Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering,2005,23(1):1-12.
住房城乡建设部.海绵城市建设技术指南:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[R].北京:住房城乡建设部,2014.
国务院办公厅.关于推进海绵城市建设的指导意见[R].北京:国务院办公厅,2015.
Brown R A, Hunt Ⅲ W F. Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2010,137(3):132-143.
Scholz M, Xu J. Performance comparison of experimental constructed wetlands with different filter media and macrophytes treating industrial wastewater contaminated with lead and copper[J].Bioresource Technology,2002,83(2):71-79.
Knight R L, Kadlec R H, Ohlendorf H M. The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1999,33(7):973-980.
籍国东,孙铁珩,常士俊,等.自由表面流人工湿地处理超稠油废水[J].环境科学,2001,22(4):95-99.
王根绪,程国栋,徐中民.中国西北干旱区水资源利用及其生态环境问题[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(2):14-21.
陆垂裕,孙青言,李慧,等.基于水循环模拟的干旱半干旱地区地下水补给评价[J].水利学报,2014,45(6):701-711.
唐双成,罗纨,贾忠华,等.填料及降雨特征对雨水花园削减径流及实现海绵城市建设目标的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):73-78,102.
左其亭.我国海绵城市建设中的水科学难题[J].水资源保护,2016,32(4):21-26.
赵景波.陕西黄土高原500 ka BP的古土壤与气候带迁移[J].地理学报,2001,56(3):323-331.
陈瑶,张科利,罗利芳,等.黄土坡耕地弃耕后土壤入渗变化规律及影响因素[J].泥沙研究,2005(5):45-50.
袁建平,张素丽,张春燕,等.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤稳定入渗速率空间变异[J].土壤学报,2001,38(4):579-583.
齐瑞鹏,张磊,颜永毫,等.定容重条件下生物炭对半干旱区土壤水分入渗特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(8):2281-2288.
Philip J R. The theory of infiltration:1.The infiltration equation and its solution[J].Soil Science,1957,83(5):345-358.
Wang Q J, Horton R, Shao M A. Algebraic model for one-dimensional infiltration and soil water distribution[J].Soil Science,2003,168(10):671-676.
梁爱民.非饱和土壤渗透特性及饱和入渗机理试验研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2008.
马娟娟,孙西欢,李占斌.蓄水坑灌条件下变水头作用的垂直一维土壤入渗参数试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(增刊1):88-91.
徐尧权.动态水压滴灌条件下土壤水分运移特性研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
付秋萍,王全九,樊军.盘式吸渗仪吸渗率计算方法比较[J].农业机械学报,2009,40(9):56-62.
付秋萍,王全九,樊军.Philip公式确定吸渗率时间尺度研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):65-70.
0
浏览量
970
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621