植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响

苏远逸; 李鹏; 任宗萍; 李聪; 杨殊桐; 张建文; 刘展

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响
- Effects of Vegetation Spatial Position on Convex Slope Erosion and Sediment Particle Size Fractionation
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第4期页码：145-151
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安,710048
  2. 西安理工大学旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业局重点实验室,西安,710048
  3. 河南黄河水文勘测设计院,郑州,450004
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "苏远逸(1993-),男,陕西宝鸡人,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:suyuanyi666@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0402404）水利部黄土高原水土流失过程与控制重点实验室开放基金项目（201805）国家自然科学基金项目"基于能量过程的沟道工程侵蚀阻控机理研究"（51779204）陕西省创新人才推进计划项目科技（水土资源环境演变与调控）创新团队项目（2018TD-037）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.022
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
苏远逸, 李鹏, 任宗萍, 等. 植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):145-151.

SU Yuanyi, LI Peng, REN Zongping, et al. Effects of Vegetation Spatial Position on Convex Slope Erosion and Sediment Particle Size Fractionation[J]. 2020, 34(4): 145-151.
苏远逸, 李鹏, 任宗萍, 等. 植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):145-151. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.022.

SU Yuanyi, LI Peng, REN Zongping, et al. Effects of Vegetation Spatial Position on Convex Slope Erosion and Sediment Particle Size Fractionation[J]. 2020, 34(4): 145-151. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.022.

摘要

针对黄土高原水土流失严重的问题，结合该地区缺水的现状，在有限的植被措施条件下，以凸型坡为研究对象，将草带布设在上坡面5种不同位置，利用室内放水冲刷试验对不同植被空间配置下坡面侵蚀过程和泥沙颗粒分选特征进行了研究，阐明了植被能够有效发挥水土保持功效的作用，并初步提出在低植被覆盖度下植被发挥水土保持功效的最优植被空间配置。结果表明：（1）不同植被空间配置的产流强度Cv值为10.26%~15.50%，产流强度的波动程度较小，其中配置A的产流强度与配置B和配置F的产流强度表现为显著性差异（p<0.05），不同植被空间配置的产沙强度Cv值均在26.00%以上，配置A的产沙强度与其他配置的产沙强度均表现为显著性差异（p<0.05），在坡面布设草带对产沙过程的影响大于对产流过程的影响；（2）在凸型坡的上坡面种植植被后，总产流产沙量与裸坡（配置A）相比均有不同程度的降低，其中配置F的减水效益达到19.65%，配置B的减沙效益高达70%以上；（3）不同植被空间配置下泥沙颗粒平均重量直径（MWD）的平均值表现为配置A > 配置F > 配置D > 配置E > 配置C > 本底物 > 配置B，MWD的平均值随着产流时间的延长逐渐稳定并接近于本底物，在有植被覆盖坡面的水力侵蚀条件下，侵蚀颗粒以细颗粒为主，粉粒含量较高，砂粒含量相对较小，并且植被布设位置距离坡顶越远更容易侵蚀0.002~0.05 mm的粉粒。研究结果有助于加深植被空间配置对坡面侵蚀产沙作用机理的理解。

Abstract

Aiming at the serious problem of soil erosion on the Loess Plateau

combined with the current situation of water shortage in the region

under the condition of limited vegetation measures

the convex slope was taken as the research object

and the grass belt was laid on 5 different positions on the upslope

and the indoor water discharge was used. The experiment studied the slope erosion process and sediment particle size fractionation characteristics under different vegetation spatial positions

and clarified that the vegetation can effectively exert the soil and water conservation effect

and primitively proposed the optimal position of soil and water conservation effects under low vegetation coverage. The results showed that: (1) The Cv value of the flow intensity of different vegetation spatial positions is between 10.26% and 15.50%

and the fluctuation of the runoff intensity is small. The runoff intensity of position A and the runoff of position B and position F were small. The intensity showed a significant difference (p<0.05)

and the Cv value of the sediment yield in different vegetation spatial positions were above 26.00%. The sediment yield intensity of the position A showed significant difference with sediment yield of other positions (p<0.05). The effect of laying grass strips on the slope on the sediment production process was greater than the impact on the runoff process. (2) After planting vegetation on the upslope of the convex slope

the total runoff yield was reduced to a different extent compared with the bare slope (Position A)

and the water reduction benefit of the position F was 19.65%. The sediment yield reduction benefit of position B was as high as 70% or more. (3) The average value of the average weight diameter (MWD) of sediment particles in different vegetation spatial position was: Position A > Position F > Position D > Position E > Position C > Substrate > Position B

the mean value of MWD gradually stabilized and approached the substrate with the prolongation of runoff generation time. Under the condition of hydraulic erosion with vegetation coverage

the erosion particles were mainly fine grains

the content of powder grains was higher

and the content of sand was relatively small. The farther the vegetation was from the top of the slope

the easier it was to erode 0.002~0.05 mm of powder. This study will help to deepen the understanding of the spatial distribution of vegetation on the mechanism of convex slope erosion and sediment production.

关键词

Keywords

references

焦菊英,王万忠.人工草地在黄土高原水土保持中的减水减沙效益与有效盖度[J].草地学报,2001,9(3):176-181.

Zhang X P, Zhang L, Zhao J, et al. Responses of stream flow to changes in climate and land use/cover in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Water Resources Research,2008,44(7):1-12.

Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y Y, et al. Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2014,116(5):51-59.

王旭东,张霞,王彦丽,等.不同耕作方式对黄土高原黑垆土有机碳库组成的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(11):229-237.

王兵,刘国彬,张光辉,等.黄土丘陵区中尺度流域水土流失治理环境效应评估[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(7):28-35.

谢永生,李占斌,王继军,等.黄土高原水土流失治理模式的层次结构及其演变[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):211-214.

张霞,李鹏,李占斌,等.不同植被格局下凸型坡径流流速时空变化及产沙研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):16-21.

García-Ruiz J M, Lana-Renault N, Begueria S, et al. From plot to regional scales:Interactions of slope and catchment hydrological and geomorphic processes in the Spanish Pyrenees[J].Geomorphology,2010,120(3/4):248-257.

Fu B J, Liu Y, Lv Y H, et al. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Ecological Complexity,2011,8(4):284-293.

魏霞,李占斌,李勋贵,等.黄土高原坡沟系统土壤侵蚀研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(1):108-113.

吕威,李淑芹,雷廷武,等.聚丙烯酰胺应用对黄土复合坡面降雨产流的影响[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):71-79.

Rieke-Zapp D H, Nearing M A. Slope shape effects on erosion:A laboratory study[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(5):1463-1471.

张霞.黄土区地貌与植被格局的侵蚀动力过程试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2018.

李鹏,李占斌.植被保持水土有效性研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(1):76-80.

吴卿,杨春霞,甄斌,等.草被覆盖度对黄土坡面径流产沙影响的试验研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(9):56-58.

程圣东,李鹏,李聪,等.降雨-植被格局耦合作用对坡沟系统水沙特征影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2016,24(2):230-241.

马勇勇,李占斌,任宗萍,等.草带布设位置对坡沟系统水文连通性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):170-176.

贾莲莲.模拟降雨条件下黄土坡面侵蚀过程与调控试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2010.

苏远逸,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面植被格局对坡沟系统能量调控及水沙响应关系的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):32-39.

张文辉,刘国彬.黄土高原植被生态恢复评价、问题与对策[J].林业科学,2007(1):102-106.

张洋,张辉,李占斌,等.不同降雨强度下黄土区冻土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(11):144-150.

Slattery M C, Burt T P. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1997,22(8):705-719.

吴凤至,史志华,岳本江,等.坡面侵蚀过程中泥沙颗粒特性研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(5):1235-1240.

汤珊珊,李鹏,任宗萍,等.模拟降雨下覆沙坡面侵蚀颗粒特征研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(1):39-47.

李占斌,李社新,任宗萍,等.冻融作用对坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):56-60.

朱高立,文博,李静,等.不同雨强和覆盖度条件下崩积体侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(6):1371-1379.

蒋芳市,黄炎和,林金石,等.坡度和雨强对崩岗崩积体侵蚀泥沙颗粒特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2014,51(5):974-982.

郑明国,蔡强国,王彩峰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面水保措施及植被对流域尺度水沙关系的影响[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):47-53.

魏霞,李勋贵,李占斌,等.植被覆盖下黄土凸型复合坡面水流特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(22):147-154.

Pan C Z, Shangguan Z P. Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2006,331(1):178-185.

Pan C Z, Shangguan Z P. The effects of ryegrass roots and shoots on loess erosion under simulated rainfall[J].Catena,2007,70(3):350-355.

李聪.植被格局对坡沟系统侵蚀输沙过程调控作用试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2015.

Li M, Yao W Y, Ding W F, et al. Effect of grass coverage on sediment yield in the hillslope-gully side erosion system[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2009,19(3):321-330.

Benito E, Santiago J L, De Blas E, et al. Deforestation of water-repellent soils in Galicia (NW Spain):Effects on surface runoff and erosion under simulated rainfall[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2003,28(2):145-155.

韩鹏,李秀霞.黄河流域土壤侵蚀及植被水保效益研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2008,16(2):181-190.

Wang L, Shi Z H, Wang J, et al. Rainfall kinetic energy controlling erosion processes and sediment sorting on steep hillslopes:A case study of clay loam soil from the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,512:168-176.

汤珊珊,高海东,李占斌,等.坡面覆沙后侵蚀泥沙颗粒分选特性[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(2):133-138.

Issa O M, Bissonnais Y L, Planchon O, et al. Soil detachment and transport on field and laboratory-scale interrill areas:Erosion processes and the size-selectivity of eroded sediment[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2006,31(8):929-939.

Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose C W, et al. An investigation of flow-driven soil erosion processes at low streampowers[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,342(1/2):134-142.

Shi Z H, Yan F L, Li L, et al. Interrill erosion from disturbed and undisturbed samples in relation to topsoil aggregate stability in red soils from subtropical China[J].Catena,2010,81(3):240-248.

浏览量

920

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据