1. 西安理工大学水利水电学院,西安,710048
2. 西北农林科技大学旱区农业水土工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "张文平(1992-),男,甘肃武威人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业水土工程研究。E-mail:zwping2018@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
张文平, 聂卫波, 马敬东, 等. 肥液浓度对土壤水力特性参数的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):63-71.
ZHANG Wenping, NIE Weibo, MA Jingdong, et al. Effect of Fertilizer Concentration on Soil Hydraulic Parameters[J]. 2020, 34(4): 63-71.
张文平, 聂卫波, 马敬东, 等. 肥液浓度对土壤水力特性参数的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):63-71. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.010.
ZHANG Wenping, NIE Weibo, MA Jingdong, et al. Effect of Fertilizer Concentration on Soil Hydraulic Parameters[J]. 2020, 34(4): 63-71. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.010.
为了研究不同肥液(尿素)浓度对土壤水力特性参数的影响,选取陕西省杨凌区一级阶地的砂壤土和三级阶地黏壤土为供试土壤进行一维垂直入渗试验,采用数值反演方法估算了不同肥液浓度条件下的土壤水力特性参数,并量化分析了土壤水力特性参数变化对累积入渗量的影响,最终建立了考虑肥液浓度变化的土壤水力特性参数估算式。结果表明,土壤饱和含水率θs、形状系数n、饱和导水率Ks均随肥液浓度的增大而逐渐增大,而进气值吸力的倒数α随肥液浓度的增大呈减小趋势;土壤水力特性参数对累积入渗量的敏感性关系为n > θs > Ks > α,其中α对累积入渗量的影响<10%;本试验条件下,θs、n与Ks与肥液浓度呈指数函数关系,利用估算结果模拟了一维垂直入渗过程中的累积入渗量和剖面含水率,并与实测值进行了比较,两者具有良好的一致性,说明所建考虑肥液浓度变化的土壤水力特性参数估算式是可靠的,研究结果可为农田水肥管理提供理论依据。
In order to study the effect of different fertilizer concentration (Urea) on soil hydraulic parameters
the sandy loam of three-stage terrace and clay loam of the first terrace in Yangling District of Shaanxi Province are used as the test soil
the parameters of soil hydraulic under different fertilizer concentration were estimated by numerical inversion method
and analyzes the influence of the change of soil hydraulic parameters on the cumulative infiltration quantitatively
Finally
the estimation formula of soil hydraulic parameters considering the change of fertilizer concentration was established. The results showed that with the increasing of fertilizer concentration
the saturated water content (θs)
shape coefficient (n) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) of soil is increasing
but the suction of intake reciprocal value (α) decreased with the increasing of fertilizer concentration. The sensitivity of soil hydraulic parameters to cumulative infiltration is n > θs > Ks > α
and the influence of α on cumulative infiltration is less than 10%. In this paper
the relationship between θs and Ks and the concentration of fertilizer solution is exponential function. Utilizing estimation result simulated the cumulative infiltration amount and water content of soil profile in the process of one-dimensional vertical infiltration
and compared with the measured value
the two are showing no difference
It shows that the formula of soil hydraulic characteristic parameters considering the change of fertilizer concentration is reliable
this study can provide theoretical basis for water and fertilizer management of farmland.
Brunetti G, Simunek J, Bautista E. A hybrid finite volume-finite element model for the numerical analysis of furrow irrigation and fertigation[J].Computers and Electronics Agriculture,2018,150:312-327.
Dai W, Zhang S H, Xu D, et al. Efficient simulation of surface solute transport in basin fertigation[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2017,143(11):401-412.
Sabillón G N, Merkley G P. Fertigation guidelines for furrow irrigation[J].Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research,2004,2(4):576-587.
Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Parsinejad M, et al. Optimum design of alternate and conventional furrow fertigation to minimize nitrate loss[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2013,139(11):911-921.
Aimůunek J, Bristow K L, Helalia S A, et al. The effect of different fertigation strategies and furrow surface treatments on plant water and nitrogen use[J].Irrigation Science,2016,34(1):53-69.
乔冬梅,齐学斌,庞鸿宾,等.基于BP神经网络的土壤氮素运移模型[J].节水灌溉,2008(1):1-4.
盛丰,王康,张仁铎,等.土壤非均匀水流运动与溶质运移的两区-两阶段模型[J].水利学报,2015,46(4):433-442.
Liu Y, Kuang X, Jiao J J, et al. Numerical study of variable-density flow and transport in unsaturated-saturated porous media[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2015,182:117-130.
李久生,张建君,饶敏杰.滴灌施肥灌溉的水氮运移数学模拟及试验验证[J].水利学报,2005,36(8):932-938.
任长江,王建华,赵勇,等.改进的水动力参数模型在非饱和土壤溶质运移问题中的应用[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑),2018,33(4):480-489.
郝芳华,孙雯,曾阿妍,等.HYDRUS-1D模型对河套灌区不同灌施情景下氮素迁移的模拟[J].环境科学学报,2008,28(5):853-858.
唐敏,许文来,郭宗会.施肥过程中尿素的迁移与转化研究[J].绿色科技,2017(6):59-61.
李京玲,陈攀,孙西欢,等.蓄水坑灌肥液入渗下土壤水氮运移特性试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(10):56-61.
刘利华,费良军,陈琳,等.膜孔直径对浑水膜孔灌土壤水氮运移特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):126-131.
聂卫波,马孝义,聂坤堃,等.沟灌土壤湿润体空间矩特征参数估算模型[J].水科学进展,2017,28(6):829-838.
鲁程鹏,束龙仓,刘丽红,等.基于灵敏度分析的地下水数值模拟精度适应性评价[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(1):26-30.
范严伟,赵文举,毕贵权.Van Genuchten模型参数变化对土壤入渗特性的影响分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2016(3):52-56.
Lu X H, Jin M G, van Genuchten M T, et al. Groundwater recharge at five representative sites in the Hebei Plain, China[J].Ground Water,2011,49(2):286-294.
王志涛,缴锡云,韩红亮,等.土壤垂直一维入渗对VG模型参数的敏感性分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(1):80-84.
刘昭,杨文元,查元源,等.基于田块尺度含水率观测的土壤水力参数多模型反演[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(6):135-144.
仵峰,张凯,宰松梅,等.小麦玉米秸秆掺土还田量对土壤水分运动特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):101-105.
董晓华,郭梁锋,马海波,等.尿素浓度对土壤水分特征曲线及持水性的影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2018(1):45-47,51.
霍思远,靳孟贵.Van Genuchten模型参数对降水入渗数值模拟的敏感性[J].地球科学,2017,42(3):447-452,470.
毛娜,黄来明,邵明安.黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率剖面分布及影响因素[J].土壤,2019,51(2):381-389.
高志鹏,屈吉鸿,陈南祥,等.一维水流及溶质运移对VG模型参数的敏感性分析[J].节水灌溉,2017(11):65-71,76.
张海阔,姜翠玲,李亮,等.基于HYDRUS-1D模拟的变水头入渗条件下VG模型参数敏感性分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(1):32-40.
聂坤堃,聂卫波,白清俊.沟灌肥液入渗硝态氮运移特性数值模拟及影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(17):128-139.
董晓华,郭梁锋,马海波,等.尿素浓度对土壤水分特征曲线及持水性的影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2018(1):45-47,51.
冯玚.不同水肥热条件下土壤水分运动参数与氮素转化参数研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2017.
何振嘉,傅渝亮,王博,等.涌泉根灌不同浓度肥液入渗特性及土壤湿润体模型研究[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(24):90-99.
何振嘉,傅渝亮.涌泉根灌湿润体水氮运移特性试验研究[J].排灌机械工程学报,2019,37(1):73-79.
刘小刚,朱益飞,余小弟,等.不同水头和土壤容重下微润灌湿润体内水盐分布特性[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(7):189-197.
0
浏览量
1160
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621