1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "杨茹珍(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事坡面土壤侵蚀过程研究。E-mail:1323103747@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
杨茹珍, 张风宝, 杨明义, 等. 急陡黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的水动力学特性试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):31-36.
YANG Ruzhen, ZHANG Fengbao, YANG Mingyi, et al. Hydraulic Characteristics of Rill Erosion on Steep Loess Slope[J]. 2020, 34(4): 31-36.
杨茹珍, 张风宝, 杨明义, 等. 急陡黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的水动力学特性试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):31-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.005.
YANG Ruzhen, ZHANG Fengbao, YANG Mingyi, et al. Hydraulic Characteristics of Rill Erosion on Steep Loess Slope[J]. 2020, 34(4): 31-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.005.
通过组合不同坡度(25°,30°,35°,40°,45°,50°)、不同流量(0.6,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5 L/min)的室内放水冲刷试验,对急陡黄土坡面细沟侵蚀发生过程中的细沟水动力学特性进行了研究。结果表明:细沟水流平均流速随细沟的发育呈现出先减小后稳定的变化趋势。细沟流的雷诺数Re在199.996~873.482变化,且主要受流量的影响,随着流量的增大呈线性关系;而弗劳德数Fr在整个细沟发育过程中均大于1,表明细沟流均处于急流范围,且与流量呈倒数关系,随着放水流量的增大Fr呈曲线减小。阻力系数f随着流量的增加而增大,且与雷诺数之间存在f=a·Re-b(a、b为系数)的幂函数关系。
The hydraulic characteristics of rill erosion were studied by using runoff scouring experiment under the different steep Loess slope gradients(25°
30°
35°
40°
45°
50°) and the different flow discharges(0.6
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5 L/min). The results showed that velocity decreased first
then kept smooth and steady as the scouring time. The Reynolds number of the flow varied between 199.996 and 873.482 in the erosion process. It was affected mainly by the flow discharge which was in a linear relationship with flow discharge. The Froude number of flow was larger than 1 in the whole experiments
which indicated that the rill flow belonged to the supercritical flow condition. Meanwhile
the Froude number of rill flow was in a reciprocal decreased relationship with flow. Darcy-weisbach resistance coefficient (f) was positively related to flow and was in a power function relationship with the Reynolds number.
郑粉莉,王占礼,杨勤科.土壤侵蚀学科发展战略[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):1-10.
李君兰,蔡强国,孙莉英,等.细沟侵蚀影响因素和临界条件研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(11):1319-1325.
FAO. Soil erosion by water:Some measures for its control on cultivated lands[M].FAO/UNESCO, Rome,1956:98-104.
李占斌,秦百顺,亢伟,等.陡坡面发育的细沟水动力学特性室内试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6):64-68.
江长通,王银梅,胡乾亮,等.黄土边坡冲刷过程及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):14-17,47.
刘纪根,雷廷武,潘英华,等.陡坡耕地施加PAM侵蚀产沙规律及临界坡长的试验研究[J].土壤学报,2003,40(4):504-510.
沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.降雨强度和坡度对细沟形态特征的综合影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,46(7):162-170.
沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀形态试验[J].生态学报,2014,34(19):5514-5521.
Qin C, Zheng F L, Zhang X C, et al. A simulation of rill bed incision processes in upland concentrated flows[J].Catena,2018,165:310-319.
李军鹏,董卫国,孟惠芳,等.降雨条件下坡面细沟侵蚀模型及临界坡度研究[J].灾害学,2016,31(1):207-212.
夏卫生,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.冲刷条件下坡面水流速度与产沙关系研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(6):876-880.
米宏星,陈晓燕,赵宇,等.黄土坡面细沟径流流速的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):66-69,110.
杨大明,高佩玲,张晴雯,等.黄土坡面细沟水动力学特性试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2018(4):49-56.
丁文峰,李占斌,丁登山.坡面细沟侵蚀过程的水动力学特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):72-75.
Moss A J, Walker P H, Hutka J. Raindrop-simulated transportation in shallow water flows:An experimental study[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1979, 2:165-184.
李天阳,何丙辉,雷廷武,等.汶川震区滑坡堆积体土石混合坡面细沟水动力学特征室内试验[J].水利学报,2014,45(8):892-902.
雷廷武,张晴雯,闫丽娟,等.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
肖培青,姚文艺,申震洲,等.苜蓿草地侵蚀产沙过程及其水动力学机理试验研究[J].水利学报,2011,42(2):232-237.
Govers G. Relationships between discharge, velocity, and flow area for rills eroding loose, non-layered materials[J].Earth Surface Processes Landforms,1992,17:515-528.
李凤英,何小武,肖青亮,等.急陡坡土壤侵蚀试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):38-44.
任熠,王先拓,王玉宽,等.紫色土坡面细沟流的水动力学特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(6):39-42,46.
敬向峰,吕宏兴,张宽地,等.不同糙率坡面水力学特征的实验研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(2):33-38.
张光辉,卫海燕,刘宝元.坡面流水动力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):58-61.
Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D, et al. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics: I. Velocity relationship[J].Transactions of the Asabe,1984,27(3):790-796.
张科利.黄土坡面侵蚀产沙分配及其与降雨特征关系的研究[J].泥沙研究,1991(4):39-46.
0
浏览量
1103
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621