1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京,100875
3. 黄河流域水土保持生态环境监测中心,西安,710021
[ "黎俊佑(1994-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事坡面水文与土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:junyoulibfu@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
黎俊佑, 马岚, 刘京晶, 等. 雨型对华北土石山区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):1-6.
LI Junyou, MA Lan, LIU Jingjing, et al. Effects of Rainfall Patterns on Slope Soil Erosion in the Rocky Mountain Area of North China[J]. 2020, 34(4): 1-6.
黎俊佑, 马岚, 刘京晶, 等. 雨型对华北土石山区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(4):1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.001.
LI Junyou, MA Lan, LIU Jingjing, et al. Effects of Rainfall Patterns on Slope Soil Erosion in the Rocky Mountain Area of North China[J]. 2020, 34(4): 1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.04.001.
为研究雨型对华北土石山区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响,通过室内人工模拟降雨试验,以华北土石山区主要土壤类型黄土性褐土和石灰性褐土为研究对象,设计次降雨中平均降雨强度和降雨量相同的3种不同降雨类型(均匀型、增加型、减弱型对应的降雨强度组合分别为60,30~60~90,90~60~30 mm/h),分析不同雨型下华北土石山区坡面产流产沙的变化规律。结果表明:(1)不同雨型的产流时间与起始阶段降雨强度呈负相关,增加型降雨的坡面产流时间最长,且分别为均匀型和减弱型的1.98,4.15倍;减弱型降雨的总径流量和总侵蚀量最大,而均匀型降雨的最小,减弱型降雨的总径流量是均匀型和增加型降雨的1.05~1.12倍,总侵蚀量分别是增加型和均匀型的1.22,1.78倍。(2)在不同雨型下,同一降雨强度出现在不同降雨阶段,使得坡面产流产沙的过程不同。(3)同一降雨强度出现在雨型起始阶段的径流量和贡献率与结束阶段相比偏小。次降雨起始阶段的强度为30 mm/h时,黄土性褐土的侵蚀量和贡献率大于其在结束阶段的侵蚀量和贡献率,而石灰性褐土与之相反。
In order to research the impact of rainfall patterns on slope erosion in the rocky mountain area of North China
the loess cinnamon and the calcic cinnamon from this area were selected and indoor experiments were conducted. The experiment treatment included three patterns of simulated rainfalls with the same total rainfall and mean intensity
covering uniform type (60 mm/h)
rising type (30~60~90 mm/h)
and falling type (90~60~30 mm/h). The results indicated that: (1) The initial runoff generation time of different rainfall and patterns was negatively correlated with the rainfall intensity at the initial stage. The initial runoff generation time of the rising type slope was 1.98 and 4.15 times higher than that of the uniform and falling types
respectively. The order of total runoff and total erosion generated by different rainfall patterns was falling type > rising type > uniform type. The total runoff of the falling type was 1.05~1.12 times of other rainfall patterns
and the total erosion was 1.22 and 1.78 times of the rising and uniform types
respectively. (2) Under different rainfall patterns
the same rainfall intensity appeared in different rainfall stages
which made the processes of runoff and sediment production on the slope different. (3) The runoff and contribution rate of the same rainfall intensity at the initial stage of the rainfall pattern was smaller than that at the end stage. When the 30 mm/h rainfall intensity appeared at the beginning of the rainfall pattern
the erosion amount and contribution rate of the loess cinnamon was greater than that at the end stage
while the calcic cinnamon was the opposite.
刘淑珍,刘斌涛,苏正安,等.对我国水土流失调查评价方法若干问题的思考[J].山地学报,2014,32(2):150-153.
张杰,陈晓安,汤崇军,等.典型水土保持措施对红壤坡地柑橘园水土保持效益的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):165-173.
Derege T M, Atsushi T, Mitsuru T, et al. Evaluation of kinetic energy and erosivity potential of simulated rainfall using Laser Precipitation Monitor[J].Catena,2016,137:237-243.
Zhang F B, Huang C H, Yang M Y, et al. Rainfall simulation experiments indicate that biochar addition enhances erosion of loess-derived soils[J].Land Degradation and Development,2019,30(18):2272-2286.
Pan C Z, Ma L. How the spatial distribution of grass contributes to controlling hillslope erosion[J].Hydrological Processes,2019,34(1):68-81.
Dunkerley D. Rain event properties in nature and in rainfall simulation experiments:A comparative review with recommendations for increasingly systematic study and reporting[J].Hydrological Processes,2008,22:4415-4435.
安娟,于妍,吴元芝.降雨类型对褐土横垄坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):150-156.
Wang B, Steiner J, Zheng F L, et al. Impact of rainfall pattern on interrill erosion process[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2017,42(12):1833-1846.
陈晓安,蔡强国,郑明国,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区的岔巴沟流域次降雨侵蚀力的研究[J].泥沙研究,2010(1):5-10.
郑粉莉,唐克丽,白红英,等.子午岭林区不同地形部位开垦裸露地降雨侵蚀力的研究[J].水土保持学报,1994,8(1):26-32.
Mohamadi M A, Kavian A. Effects of rainfall patterns on runoff and soil erosion in field plots[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2015,3(4):273-281.
秦伟,左长清,晏清洪,等.红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):124-132.
Dunkerley D. Effects of rainfall intensity fluctuations on infiltration and runoff:Rainfall simulation on dryland soils, Fowlers Gap, Australia[J].Hydrological Processes,2012,26(15):2211-2224.
Wang W T, Yin S Q, Xie Y, et al. Effects of four storm patterns on soil loss from five soils under natural rainfall[J].Catena,2016,141:56-65.
郑粉莉,边锋,卢嘉,等.雨型对东北典型黑土区顺坡垄作坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(2):90-97.
程金花,秦越,张洪江,等.华北土石山区模拟降雨下土壤溅蚀研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):153-161.
孙继松,雷蕾,于波,等.近10年北京地区极端暴雨事件的基本特征[J].气象学报,2015,73(4):609-623.
和继军,蔡强国,王学强.北方土石山区坡耕地水土保持措施的空间有效配置[J].地理研究,2010,29(6):1017-1026.
刘京晶,马岚,薛孟君,等.不同处理下油松枯落物减流减沙效应试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):126-132.
沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.雨滴打击对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(8):104-112.
张熠昕,马超,杨海龙,等.北京市密云区龙潭沟流域泥石流灾害成因与动力学特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(7):73-84.
吕刚,刘雅卓,陈鸿,等.褐土和棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀过程及侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):64-69.
陈佩岩,马岚,薛孟君,等.华北土石山区不同粒径土壤团聚体特征及其与坡面侵蚀定量关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(8):64-71.
和继军,吕烨,宫辉力,等.细沟侵蚀特征及其产流产沙过程试验研究[J].水利学报,2013,44(4):398-405.
成玉婷,李鹏,徐国策,等.冻融条件下土壤可蚀性对坡面氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):141-149.
张攀,姚文艺,唐洪武,等.黄土坡面细沟形态变化及对侵蚀产沙过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(5):114-119.
吴发启,范文波.土壤结皮对降雨入渗和产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):97-101.
Assouline S, Ben-Hur M. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the dynamics of interrill erosion during soil surface sealing[J].Catena,2006,66(3):211-220.
0
浏览量
1280
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621