安徽大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥,230601
[ "白云(1993-),男,甘肃平凉人,硕士研究生,主要从事水污染防治研究。E-mail:18256542650@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
白云, 邓威, 李玉成, 等. 水稻秸秆预处理还田对土壤养分淋溶及COD的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):238-244.
BAI Yun, DENG Wei, LI Yucheng, et al. Effects of Rice Straw Pretreatment and Returning on Soil Nutrient Leaching and COD[J]. 2020, 34(3): 238-244.
白云, 邓威, 李玉成, 等. 水稻秸秆预处理还田对土壤养分淋溶及COD的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):238-244. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.036.
BAI Yun, DENG Wei, LI Yucheng, et al. Effects of Rice Straw Pretreatment and Returning on Soil Nutrient Leaching and COD[J]. 2020, 34(3): 238-244. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.036.
对秸秆进行预处理可以加快秸秆的腐解,为了探讨秸秆经过不同预处理后还田对土壤养分淋溶及COD淋出量的影响,利用白腐真菌、大球盖菇、尿素分别对秸秆进行预处理,通过室内人工土柱模拟试验方法,对秸秆配施有机肥还田后土壤中氮磷及COD淋出量进行分析。运用(SEM)扫描电镜、(FTIR)傅里叶红外光谱、(XRD)X射线多晶衍射对预处理前后秸秆结构及成分进行分析,并通过比较不同预处理秸秆与有机肥配施淋溶过程中总氮、硝态氮、铵态氮、总磷、溶磷、COD的变化来确定秸秆还田前最佳的预处理方式。结果表明:不同秸秆预处理方法使秸秆表面结构均产生不同程度的变化,分子间氢键集聚力减弱,部分碳水化合物被分解。相比空白对照组(CK),配施有机肥明显增加了淋溶液中养分及COD的含量(p<0.05);在配施有机肥的处理中,处理SF2(白腐真菌预处理秸秆还田+施肥)、SF3(尿素预处理秸秆还田+ 施肥)、SF4(未预处理秸秆还田+施肥)、SF5(大球盖菇预处理秸秆还田+施肥)相对于只施有机肥的处理SF1,总氮的淋溶量分别降低16.61%,20.42%,13.84%,33.22%,铵态氮的淋溶量分别降低了4.90%,22.77%,18.3%,38.39%,其中大球盖菇对总氮和铵态氮的累计淋溶损失量的降低作用更显著(p<0.05);各处理的淋溶液中硝态氮、总磷、溶磷的淋溶损失量差异不显著。直到淋溶结束,各个处理的COD的累计淋溶损失量从大到小为SF1(不秸秆还田+施肥) > SF4(未预处理秸秆还田+施肥) > SF3(尿素预处理秸秆还田+施肥) > SF2(白腐真菌预处理秸秆还田+施肥) > SF5(大球盖菇预处理秸秆还田+施肥) > CK(空白对照),SF5(大球盖菇预处理秸秆还田+施肥)处理的COD累计淋溶损失量低于其他处理,说明在配施有机肥条件下,大球盖菇预处理秸秆还田可以有效降低COD的累计淋溶损失量。总体来说,大球盖菇预处理秸秆还田对减少土壤氮素的淋溶损失和淋溶液中COD含量均有一定的积极作用。
The pretreatment (PT) of straw can accelerate the decomposition of the straw. In order to explore the influence of straw returning to the field after different pretreatment on soil nutrients leaching and the amount of COD
the straw was pretreated with white rot fungus
ball mushroom and urea
respectively. The amount of nitrogen
phosphorus and COD leaching out of the soil after straw returning to the field with applying organic fertilizer were studied by the method of indoor artificial soil column simulation. The structure and composition of straw before and after pretreatment were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Fourier infrared spectrum (FTIR)
X-ray polycrystal line diffraction (XRD). And the best pretreatment method was determined by comparing the changes of total nitrogen
nitrate nitrogen
ammonium nitrogen
phosphorus
soluble phosphorus and COD of different treatments during the leaching process. The results showed that different methods of straw pretreatment made the straw surface structure changed in different degrees
the intermolecular hydrogen bond aggregation force was weakened
and some carbohydrates were decomposed. Compared with the blank control group (CK)
the application of organic fertilizer significantly increased the content of nutrients and COD in the doused solution (p<0.05). In the treatments of involving organic fertilizer
compared with SF1(just organic fertilizer)
the leaching amount of total nitrogen in SF2 (pretreated by white-rot fungi and returning
fertilization)
SF3 (pretreated by urea and returning
fertilization)
SF4 (no pretreatment
returning
fertilization) and SF5 (pretreated by ball cap mushroom
and returning fertilization) decreased by 16.61%
20.42%
13.84% and 33.22%
respectively
and the leaching amount of NH4+-N decreased by 4.90%
22.77%
18.3% and 38.39%
respectively. Among them
the effect of white-rot fungi on the cumulative leaching loss of total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen was more significant (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the leaching loss of NO3--N
total phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus among different treatments. Until the end of leaching
the cumulative leaching loss of COD followed the order of SF1 > SF4 > SF3 > SF2 > SF5 > CK. The cumulative leaching loss of COD in SF5 was lower than that in other treatments
which indicated that the straw returning pretreated by the ball cap mushroom could effectively reduce the cumulative leaching loss of COD. In general
the straw pretreated by ball cap mushroom and returning had a positive effect on reducing the leaching loss of soil nitrogen and COD content in the leaching solution.
Nathan P H, Sumathy S, Kyle D M, et al. The environmental effects of crop price increases:Nitrogen losses in the US Corn Belt[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2014,68(3):507-526.
吴树彪,崔畅,张笑千,等.农田施用沼液增产提质效应及水土环境影响[J]农业机械学报,2013,44(8):118-125.
Richard W, Mc Dowell. Minimising phosphorus losses from the soil matrix[J].Current Opinion in Biotechnology,2012,23(6):57-62.
杨志臣,吕贻忠,张凤荣,等.秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对水稻土培肥效果对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(3):214-218.
Alriksson B, Cavka A, Jönsson L J. Improving the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents[J].Bioresource Technology,2011,102(2):1254-1263.
毛华明,朱仁俊,冯仰廉.饲喂复合化学处理大麦秸颗粒对泌乳牛生产性能的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,1999,14(2):167-170.
赵晶,张福蓉,陈明,等.NaOH预处理对玉米秸秆纤维结构特性和酶解效率的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(7):1407-1412.
史旭洋,钱程,刘艳,等.不同方法预处理的玉米秸秆结构与酶解分析[J].分析化学,2018,46(9):1501-1506.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:128-136.
Keikhosro K, Mohammad J T. A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses:Composition, imaging,and crystallinity[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,200:1008-1018.
Rouches E, Herpoël-Gimbert I, Steyer J P, et al. Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellu-losic biomass:A review[J].Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016,59:179-198.
S J A van Kuijk, Sonnenberg A S M, Baars J J P, et al. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient:A review[J].Biotechnology Advances,2015,33(1):191-200.
Jain A, Balasubramanian R, Srinivasan M P. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity:A review[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2016,283:789-805.
Asoka P L, Peramune P R U S K. Coconut coir pith lignin:A physicochemical and thermal characterization[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2018,113:45-52.
Camiscia P, Giordano E D V, Brassesco M E, et al. Comparison of soybean hull pretreatments to obtain cellulose and chemical derivatives:Physical chemistry characterization[J].Carbohydrate Polymers,2018,198:342-351.
Kuijk S J A, Sonnenberg. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient:A review[J].Biotechnology Advances,2015,33(1):191-202.
Juan D R, Rafael S, Pilar D C, et al. Isolation and characterization of lignins from wheat straw:Application as binder in lithium batteries[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2017,104:32-41.
陈帅,刘峙嵘,曾凯.腐秆剂对水稻秸秆腐解性能的影响[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(2):839-844.
Perrone O M, Colombari F M, Rossi J S, et al. Ozonolysis combined withultrasound as a pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse:Effect on the enzymatic saccharification and the physical and chemical characteristics of the substrate[J].Bioresour Technology,2016,218:69-76.
Milena M T, Odílio B G A, Natália C S, et al. Chemical treatment and characterization of soybean straw and soybean protein isolate/straw composite films[J].Carbohydrate Polymers,2017,157:73-82.
Carvalho M S, Virgens C F. Effect of alkaline treatment on the fruit peel of Pachira aquatic Aubl:Physico-chemical evaluation andcharacterization[J].Microchemical Journal,2018,147:67-74.
张宏威,康凌云,梁斌,等.长期大量施肥增加设施菜田土壤可溶性有机氮淋溶风险[J]农业工程学报,2013,29(21):99-107.
Wang J, Wang D J, Zhang G, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching losses from intensively managed paddy fields with straw retention[J].Agricultural Water Management,2014,141:66-73.
李江舟,娄翼来,张立猛,等.不同生物炭添加量下植烟土壤养分的淋失[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):1075-1080.
张一,李厚华,何绪生,等.不同外源添加物质对土壤磷素淋溶和迁移特征的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(5):151-156,222.
0
浏览量
1029
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621