西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
[ "张健乐(1996-),男,重庆九龙坡人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:839561158@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
张健乐, 史东梅, 刘义, 等. 土壤容重和含水率对紫色土坡耕地耕层抗剪强度的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):162-167.
ZHANG Jianle, SHI Dongmei, LIU Yi, et al. Effects of Soil Bulk Density and Water Content on Shear Strength of Cultivated-layer in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(3): 162-167.
张健乐, 史东梅, 刘义, 等. 土壤容重和含水率对紫色土坡耕地耕层抗剪强度的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):162-167. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.025.
ZHANG Jianle, SHI Dongmei, LIU Yi, et al. Effects of Soil Bulk Density and Water Content on Shear Strength of Cultivated-layer in Purple Soil Sloping Farmland[J]. 2020, 34(3): 162-167. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.025.
土壤抗剪强度既可评价土壤侵蚀敏感性,也是反映耕层土壤耕作性能的重要参数。不同剪切方式下土壤抗剪强度指标存在一定差异,以紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤为研究对象,采用室内重塑土三轴及直剪试验方法,研究容重和含水率对紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤抗剪强度的影响,并分析了2种试验方法的差异性。结果表明:(1)紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤黏聚力(c)总体随容重(ρd)增大而增加,随含水率(w)增加而减小,三轴及直剪试验条件下黏聚力最大值均出现在容重1.4 g/cm3、含水率10%水平下,分别为32.33,21.78 kPa。耕层土壤内摩擦角(φ)随容重增加而增大,随含水率增大而减小,三轴及直剪试验条件下内摩擦角最大值均出现在容重1.4 g/cm3、含水率10%水平下,分别为22.67°,29.11°。(2)在同一围压下,耕层土壤最大主应力差随容重增加而增大,随含水率增加而减小;在同一容重和含水率水平下,耕层土壤的最大主应力差随着围压升高而增大。(3)耕层土壤容重、含水率的交互作用对黏聚力和内摩擦角影响显著(P<0.05),对坡耕地耕层土壤抗剪强度抵抗侵蚀作用的最优土壤容重-含水率条件为1.4 g/cm3—10%。(4)不同剪切方式影响了土体抗剪强度指标,耕层土壤黏聚力在三轴试验条件下大于或接近直剪试验结果,而土壤内摩擦角则明显小于直剪试验结果,这主要与两种剪切试验原理差异有关。
Soil shearing strength can not only evaluate the sensitivity of soil erosion
but also is an important parameter to reflect the tillage performance of cultivated-layer. There are some differences in soil shearing strength indexes under different shearing modes. In this paper
the soil of purple soil sloping farmland was taken as the research object
the laboratory triaxial and direct shearing test method were used to study the bulk density and water content on remolded purple soil. The effect on shearing strength of the cultivated-layer soil was analyzed
and the differences between the two test methods were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The soil cohesion (c) of the purple soil sloping farmland increased with the increasing of the bulk densities(ρd) and decreased with the increasing of water contents (w). The maximum cohesive forces of the triaxial and direct shearing tests were 32.33 and 21.78 kPa respectively
both of which occurred under bulk density of 1.4 g/cm3 and water content of 10%. The internal friction angle (φ) of the cultivated-layer increased with the increasing of the bulk densities and decreased with the increasing of the water contents. The maximum internal friction angles of the triaxial and direct shearing tests were 22.67° and 29.11° respectively
under bulk density of 1.4 g/cm3 and water content of 10%. (2) Under the same confining pressure
the maximum principal stress difference of the cultivated-layer soil increased with the increasing of the bulk densities
and decreased with the increasing of water contents. Under the same bulk density and water content
the maximum principal stress difference of the cultivated-layer soil increased with the confining pressure. (3) The interaction of soil bulk density and water content in the cultivated-layer had a significant effect on cohesion and internal friction angle(P<0.05). The optimum soil bulk density—water content condition for the shear strength of the soil in sloping farmland was 1.4 g/cm3—10%.(4) Different shearing modes affected the shearing strength index of the soil. The soil cohesion of the cultivated-layer was greater or closer to the direct shearing test under the triaxial test conditions
while the soil internal friction angle was significantly lower than the direct shearing test result. This was mainly related to the difference between the two shearing test principles.
史东梅.基于RUSLE模型的紫色丘陵区坡耕地水土保持研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):39-44,251.
吕巨智,程伟东,钟昌松,等.不同耕作方式对土壤物理性状及玉米产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(30):38-43.
Fenton T E, Kazemi M, Lauterbach-Barrett M A. Erosional impact on organic matter content and productivity of selected Iowa soils[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2005, 81(2):163-171.
董杰,段艺芳,许玉凤,等.三峡库区紫色土坡地土壤退化程度评价[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):51-56.
牛俊,张平仓,邢明星.长江上游坡耕地水土流失特征及其防治对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(6):64-68.
何晓玲,郑子成,李廷轩,等.不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀及磷素流失的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(12):2492-2500.
丁文斌,蒋光毅,史东梅,等.紫色土坡耕地土壤属性差异对耕层土壤质量的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(19):6480-6493.
韩晓增,邹文秀,陆欣春,等.旱作土壤耕层及其肥力培育途径[J].土壤与作物,2015,4(4):145-150.
史东梅,蒋光毅,蒋平,等.土壤侵蚀因素对紫色丘陵区坡耕地耕层质量影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(13):270-279.
郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米生长期土壤抗剪强度变化特征及其影响因素[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(5):125-130,172.
韦杰,史炳林,李进林.紫色土坡耕地埂坎土壤抗剪性能对含水率的响应[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(20):153-160.
花可可,魏朝富,任镇江.土壤液限和抗剪强度特征值及其影响因素研究:基于紫色土区[J].农机化研究,2011,33(6):105-110.
Fattet M, Fu Y,Ghestem M, et al. Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion:Relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength[J]. Catena,2011,87:60-69.
García A J H,Jaime Y N M. Savanna soil water content effect on its shear strength-compaction relationship[J]. Revista Científica Udo Agrícola,2013,12(2):324-337.
倪九派,袁天泽,高明,等.土壤干密度和含水率对2种紫色土抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):72-77.
Trauner L, Dolinar B, MišIč M. Relationship between the undrained shear strength, water content, and mineralogical properties of fine-grained soils[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics,2005,5(4):350-355.
李保雄,苗天德.黄土抗剪强度的水敏感性特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):1003-1008.
王中文,洪宝宁,刘鑫,等.红粘土抗剪强度的水敏性研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2011,43(1):17-22.
胡斐南,魏朝富,许晨阳,等.紫色土区水稻土抗剪强度的水敏性特征[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(3):107-114.
林金石,庄雅婷,黄炎和,等.不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):106-110.
王健,刘旦旦,张鹏辉.土壤密度对土壤抗侵蚀性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2013,32(1):65-68.
林敬兰,黄炎和,张德斌,等.水分对崩岗土体抗剪切特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):55-58.
0
浏览量
1149
下载量
13
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621