1. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室,南京,210029
2. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
[ "耿韧(1990-),男,安徽阜南人,博士,工程师,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:rgeng@nhri.cn" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
耿韧, 张光辉, 洪大林, 等. 我国水蚀区坡耕地土壤分离能力的空间分布与影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):156-161.
GENG Ren, ZHANG Guanghui, HONG Dalin, et al. Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Soil Detachment Capacity of Sloping Farmland in Water Erosion Zone of China[J]. 2020, 34(3): 156-161.
耿韧, 张光辉, 洪大林, 等. 我国水蚀区坡耕地土壤分离能力的空间分布与影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):156-161. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.024.
GENG Ren, ZHANG Guanghui, HONG Dalin, et al. Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Soil Detachment Capacity of Sloping Farmland in Water Erosion Zone of China[J]. 2020, 34(3): 156-161. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.024.
我国水蚀区不同区域自然地理环境和土壤理化性质存在巨大差异,可能会引起土壤分离能力(Dc)的差异。然而目前大尺度上(如水蚀区)Dc的空间分布及其影响因素的研究尚未见报道。在水蚀区依据土壤类型和土壤质地不同布设了36个采样点,用扰动土(代表新耕坡耕地)测定其Dc并分析其影响因素。结果表明,水蚀区沙漠风沙土Dc最大,红壤Dc最小,Dc呈强度空间变异。西北黄土高原地区和南方山地丘陵区Dc最大。黏粒和砂粒含量适中的土壤质地Dc最大。水流剪切力与水流功率在模拟Dc方面无显著差异。Dc与粉粒、土壤粒径参数、阳离子交换量和土壤有机质存在显著的负相关关系,与砂粒、中值粒径、平均几何粒径和交换性纳百分比存在显著的正相关关系。水蚀区Dc可用水流剪切力、粉粒、阳离子交换量和土壤有机质很好地模拟(R2=0.71,NSE=0.71)。
There are enormous differences in natural geographical environment and soil physciochemical properties in different regions of the water erosion zone in China
which may cause differences in soil detachment capacity (Dc). However
little research has paid attention to the spatial distribution of Dc and its influencing factors at large scale (such as the water erosion region). In this study
36 sampling sites were selected in the water erosion zone according to the soil types and soil texture. Dc was measured by disturbing soils (representing freshly tilled sloping farmland) and the influencing factors were analyzed. The results showed that Dc of Aqui-Sandic Primosols was the largest
while that of Argi-Udic Ferrosols was the smallest
and Dc exhibited a strong spatial variation in the water erosion zone. The northwest Loess Plateau and the South Hilly Area had the largest Dc. The soil texture with moderate content of clay and sand had the largest Dc. There was no significant difference between shear stress and stream power in simulating Dc. Dc had a significant negative correlation with silt content
particle size parameter
cation exchange capacity and soil organic matter
and a significant positive correlation with sand content
median soil grain size
geometric mean particle diameter
and exchangeable sodium percentage. Dc in water erosion area could be well simulated by shear stress
silt content
cation exchange capacity and soil organic matter (R2=0.71
NSE=0.71).
Geng R, Zhang G H, Li Z W, et al. Soil resistance to runoff on steep croplands in Eastern China[J].Catena,2017,152:18-28.
Shi H, Shao M A. Soil and water loss from the Loess Plateau in China[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2000,45(1):9-20.
陶建格. 我国坡耕地资源开发利用与水土流失之困:水土资源系列调研分析[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(22):162-165.
唐科明,张光辉,任宗萍,等.坡面薄层水流分离土壤的动力学机理[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):46-49.
张光辉,刘宝元,张科利.坡面径流分离土壤的水动力学实验研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(6):882-886.
Geng R, Zhang G H, Li Z W, et al. Spatial variation in soil resistance to flowing water erosion along a regional transect in the Loess Plateau[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2015,40(15):2049-2058.
孙龙,张光辉,王兵,等.黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):191-197.
张光辉.土壤分离能力测定的不确定性分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):4-9.
李振炜,张光辉,耿韧,等.黄土丘陵区浅沟表层土壤粘结力的状态空间模拟[J]农业机械学报,2015,46(6):175-182.
Li Z W, Zhang G H, Geng R, et al. Land use impacts on soil detachment capacity by overland flow in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2015,124:9-17.
Li Z W, Zhang G H, Geng R, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil detachment capacity by overland flow at a hillslope with ephemeral gullies on the Loess Plateau[J].Geomorphology,2015,248:264-272.
Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y Y, et al. Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2014,116:51-59.
唐克丽.中国水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:191-194.
Zhang G H, Tang M K, Zhang X C. Temporal variation in soil detachment under different land uses in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2010,34(9):1302-1309.
Zhang G H, Liu B Y, Nearing M A, et al. Soil detachment by shallow flow[J].Transactions of the ASAE,2002,45(2):351-357.
Yu Y C, Zhang G H, Reng R, et al. Temporal variation in soil detachment capacity by overland flow under four typical crops in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Biosystems Engineering,2014,122(3):139-148.
Zhang K L, Shu A P, Xu X L, et al. Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soils in China[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2008,72(6):1002-1011.
Su Z L, Zhang G H, Yi T, et al. Soil detachment capacity by overland flow for soils of the Beijing region[J].Soil Science,2014,179(9):446-453.
Knapen A, Posesen J, Govers G, et al. Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion:A review[J].Earth Science Reviews,2007,80(1):75-109.
Nearing M A, Foster G R, Lane L J, et al. A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project technology[J].Transactions of ASAE,1989,32(5):1587-1593.
Nearing M A, Bradford J M, Parker S C. Soil detachment by shallow flow at low slopes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1991,55(2):351-357.
蔡强国,朱远达,王石英.几种土壤的细沟侵蚀过程及其影响因素[J].水科学进展,2004,15(1):12-18.
佘立, 蔡崇法, 吴新亮,等.中南地区典型地带性土壤团聚体抗张强度的变化及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):152-157.
Bronick C J, Lal R. Soil structure and management:A review[J].Geoderma,2005,124(1):3-22.
0
浏览量
1036
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621