西北大学陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安,710127
[ "毕直磊(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态水文与水土保持研究。E-mail:18392351529@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
毕直磊, 张妍, 张鑫, 等. 土地利用和农业管理对丹江流域非点源氮污染的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):135-141.
BI Zhilei, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Xin, et al. The Impact of Land Use and Agricultural Management on Non-point Source Nitrogen Pollution in Dan River Watershed[J]. 2020, 34(3): 135-141.
毕直磊, 张妍, 张鑫, 等. 土地利用和农业管理对丹江流域非点源氮污染的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):135-141. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.021.
BI Zhilei, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Xin, et al. The Impact of Land Use and Agricultural Management on Non-point Source Nitrogen Pollution in Dan River Watershed[J]. 2020, 34(3): 135-141. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.021.
为研究土地利用和农业管理对流域非点源氮污染的影响,选择南水北调中线的重要水源地丹江流域作为研究区,应用SWAT模型模拟了流域地表水硝酸盐氮和氨氮负荷,揭示了土地利用变化和不同施肥灌溉措施对氮污染负荷的贡献。结果表明:(1)流域内全年氮污染分布不均,硝酸盐氮和氨氮污染较为严重的时段集中在每年7—9月,输出量分别为734.32,735.36 t,占全年硝酸盐氮和氨氮输出量的50%以上;(2) 硝酸盐氮和氨氮的输出量具有较大的空间差异,自上游至下游逐渐加重,污染较为严重的子流域主要集中在丹凤县和商南县;(3) 通过设置情景模拟,当坡度大于15°和25°的耕地退耕还林时,流域硝酸盐氮负荷分别减少59.83%和45.89%,氨氮负荷分别减少48.91%和35.78%。当流域内施肥量和灌溉量分别降低20%时,流域硝酸盐氮负荷分别减少3.63%和13.26%,氨氮负荷分别减少0.12%和15.65%;(4) 耕地是流域氮污染的主要来源,降低流域施肥灌溉量和陡坡地退耕还林是控制流域非点源氮污染的关键。
To study the effects of land use and agricultural management on non-point source nitrogen pollution in the watershed
Dan River watershed which is an important water source in the middle route of South-to-North Water Diversion project was selected as study area in this research
SWAT model was applied to simulate the nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen loads in the watershed
and quantify the contribution of land-use change and fertilization and irrigation measures on the nitrogen pollution loads of the river. The results indicated that:(1) The nitrogen pollution changed in different seasons
the most serious nitrogen pollution was from July to September
with the output of nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen loads of 734.32
735.36 t
respectively (total accounting for more than 50% of the nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen load); (2) The nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen loads had large spatial difference
and the pollution increased from the upstream to the downstream. The sub-watershed with high nitrogen pollution load were mainly distributed in Danfeng and Shangnan counties; (3) The situational analysis indicated that when the farmland with slope greater than 15° and 25° in the basin was converted to forest
the nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen load in the basin decreased by 59.83% and 45.89%
respectively
and the ammonia load decreased by 48.91% and 35.78%
respectively. Both of fertilizer application and irrigation decreased by 20%
nitrate nitrogen load would decrease by 3.63% and 13.26%
and ammonia nitrogen load would decrease by 0.12% and 15.65%
respectively; (4) Cultivated land is the main source of nitrogen pollution in river basin
reducing the amount of fertilizer
irrigation and vegetation restoration in sloping cropland is the key to control non-point source nitrogen pollution in the watershed.
李秀芬,朱金兆,顾晓君,等.农业面源污染现状与防治进展[J].中国人口资源与环境,2010,20(4):81-84.
杨云碧,杨彩花.我国城市地表水环境非点源污染的研究进展[J].资源节约与环保,2019,(4):115.
夏军,翟晓燕,张永勇.水环境非点源污染模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(7):941-952.
范力,张丹,段慧,等.中国农业非点源污染防治措施研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(11):85-87.
王林霁,李保柱.水环境非点源污染的模型模拟现状与发展[J].环境与发展,2019,31(4):74-76.
欧阳威,刘迎春,冷思文,等.近三十年来非点源污染研究发展趋势分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(10):2234-2241.
刘吉开,万甜,程文,等.未来气候情境下渭河流域陕西段非点源污染负荷响应[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):82-86.
Anand J, Gosain A K, Khosa R. Prediction of land use changes based on land change modeler and attribution of changes in the water balance of Ganga basin to land use change using the SWAT model[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,644:503-519.
Sorando R, Comín F A, Jiménez J J, et al. Water resources and nitrate discharges in relation to agricultural land uses in an intensively irrigated watershed[J].Science of The Total Environment,2019,659:1293-1306.
Wagena M B, Collick A S, Ross A C, et al. Impact of climate change and climate anomalies on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes in an agricultural catchment of the Chesapeake Bay watershed,USA[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,637:1443-1454.
Gabriel M, Knightes C, Cooter E, et al. Modeling the combined effects of changing land cover, climate, and atmospheric deposition on nitrogen transport in the Neuse River Basin[J].Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies,2018,18:68-79.
乔卫芳,牛海鹏,赵同谦.基于SWAT模型的丹江口水库流域农业非点源污染的时空分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(2):219-225.
郑艳霞,程超,辛小康.丹江口水库入库非点源污染负荷的计算与讨论[J].人民长江,2015,46(10):42-47.
管飞,马友华,张东红,等.农业面源污染负荷空间分布及风险评价研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(30):61-66.
Nilawar A P, Waikar M L. Use of SWAT to determine the effects of climate and land use changes on streamflow and sediment concentration in the Purna River basin, India[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018,77(23):783.
刘伟,安伟,杨敏,等.基于SWAT模型的三峡库区大宁河流域产流产沙模拟及土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):49-56.
Tan M L, Ibrahim A L, Yusop Z, et al. Impacts of land-use and climate variability on hydrological components in the Johor River basin, Malaysia[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal,2015,60(5):873-889.
韩博,周丽丽,范昊明,等.蒲河流域氮污染负荷模拟及时空分布[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(2):90-96.
欧阳威,蔡冠清,黄浩波,等.小流域农业面源氮污染时空特征及与土壤呼吸硝化关系分析[J].环境科学,2014,35(6):2411-2418.
王杰,李鹏,高海东,等.丹江上游土地利用/景观指数与水质关系初探[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):383-389.
Chiang L, Chaubey I, Gitau M W, et al. Differentiating impacts of land use changes from pasture management in a CEAP watershed using the SWAT model[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2010,53(5):1569-1584.
杨大文,雷慧闽,丛振涛.流域水文过程与植被相互作用研究现状评述[J].水利学报,2010,41(10):1142-1149.
杨宪龙,路永莉,李茹,等.小麦-玉米轮作体系多年定位试验中作物氮肥利用率计算方法探讨[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(12):3514-3520.
闫瑞,闫胜军,赵富才,等.农业非点源氮污染研究进展分析[J].环境保护科学,2014,40(4):49-55.
0
浏览量
1073
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621