1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院, 重庆三峡库区森林生态系统教育部野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学水土保持学院, 重庆缙云山三峡库区森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,北京,100083
[ "付婧(1995-),女,硕士,主要从事农业面源污染研究。E-mail:fujing0413@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
付婧, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 不同入流条件下草本缓冲带对污染物削减作用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):129-134.
FU Jing, WANG Yunqi, WANG Yujie, et al. Effect of Herbal Buffer on Pollutant Reduction Under Different Inflow Conditions[J]. 2020, 34(3): 129-134.
付婧, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 不同入流条件下草本缓冲带对污染物削减作用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):129-134. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.020.
FU Jing, WANG Yunqi, WANG Yujie, et al. Effect of Herbal Buffer on Pollutant Reduction Under Different Inflow Conditions[J]. 2020, 34(3): 129-134. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.020.
草本缓冲带能够有效拦截坡面径流中泥沙、总氮、总磷等污染物,是农业面源污染防控的主要措施之一。通过人工配水模拟地表径流,研究不同径流量对草本缓冲带截污能力的影响。结果表明:草本缓冲带对污染物都有一定的削减作用,草本缓冲带对泥沙削减效果最好,对总磷削减效果最差,白三叶对污染物的削减能力总体较黑麦草强。径流量对草本缓冲带总氮、总磷削减率影响较大,对泥沙削减率影响较小;当流量从0.08 L/s增加至0.24 L/s 时,草本缓冲带对总氮、总磷削减率减少至9%和6%,而泥沙削减率为34%。随着放水冲刷时间增加,出流总氮、总磷、泥沙浓度不断降低并逐渐达到稳定,流量增大至0.24 L/s时,总氮、总磷浓度范围为11.5~24.7,1.6~2.3 mg/L,泥沙浓度在不同流量下无明显差异。草本缓冲带对总氮、总磷去除作用受流量影响较大,在大流量时缓冲带对总氮、总磷基本无去除作用,但缓冲带对泥沙去除作用受流量影响较小。
Herbal buffer zone can effectively intercept pollutants such as sediment
total nitrogen
total phosphorus and other pollutants on slope
which is one of the main measures to prevent and control agricultural non-point source pollution. The surface runoff was simulated by artificial water distribution
and the effects of different runoff on interception capacity of herbaceous buffer zone were studied. The results showed that the herbal buffer had a certain reduction effect on pollutants. The herbal buffer had the best effect on sediment reduction and the worst effect on total phosphorus reduction. White clover had a stronger ability to reduce pollutants than ryegrass. Runoff had a greater impact on the reduction rate of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in herbal buffer zone
but a little impact on sediment reduction rate. When the flow rate increased from 0.08 L/s to 0.24 L/s
the reduction rate of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in herbal buffer zone decreased to 9% and 6%
while the sediment reduction rate was 34%. With the increasing of discharge scouring time
the concentration of total nitrogen
total phosphorus and sediment in the outflow decreased and gradually reached a stable level. When the flow rate increased to 0.24 L/s
the concentration range of total nitrogen and total phosphorus were 11.5~24.7 and 1.6~2.3 mg/L
respectively. There was no significant difference in sediment concentration under different flow rates. In this study
the removal of total nitrogen and total phosphorus by herbal buffer zone was greatly affected by the flow rate
and the buffer zone had no removal effect on total nitrogen and total phosphorus at large flow rate
but the removal of sediment by buffer zone was less affected by the flow.
倪九派.三峡库区农村面源污染解析[M].北京:科学出版社,2017:12-15.
杨林章,吴永红.农业面源污染防控与水环境保护[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2):168-176.
杨彦兰,申丽娟,谢德体,等.基于输出系数模型的三峡库区(重庆段)农业面源污染负荷估算[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(3):112-119.
孙彭成,高建恩,王显文,等.柳枝稷植被过滤带拦污增效试验初步研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(2):314-321.
Liu X M, Zhang X Y, Zhang M H. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping:A review and analysis[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2008,37(5):1667-1674.
苏天杨,李林英,姚延祷.草灌乔结合的河岸缓冲带对面源污染物的净化效果研究[J].天津农业科学,2010,16(6):82-84.
李怀恩,邓娜,杨寅群,等.植被过滤带对地表径流中污染物的净化效果[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(7):81-86.
胡威,王毅力,储昭升.草皮缓冲带对洱海流域面源污染的削减效果[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(9):4138-4144.
Abu-Zreig. Factors affecting sediment trapping in vegetated filter strips:Simulation study using VFSMOD[J].Hydrological Processes,2001,15:1477-1488.
王晨沣,王彬,王玉杰,等.不同土壤前期含水率和坡度下黄壤分离临界水动力特性[J].农业机械学报, 2017,48(4):224-232.
Pan C Z, Ma L, Wainwright J, et al. Overland flow resistances on varying slope gradients and partitioning on grassed slopes under simulated rainfall[J]. Water Resources Research,2016,52:2490-2512.
何聪,刘璐嘉,王苏胜.不同结构草皮缓冲带对农田径流氮磷去除效果研究[J].江西农业学报,2014,26(8):92-95.
袭培栋,何丙辉,冯梦蝶.农地生态草沟调控氮磷及削减径流污染物效应[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):52-57.
姜世伟.三峡库区典型小流域面源污染特征研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2017.
苗青,施春红,胡小贞,等.不同草皮构建的湖泊缓冲带对污染物的净化效果研究[J].环境污染与防治,2013,35(2):22-27.
Choi K S, Lee S G, Jang J R. Vegetative Filter Strip (VFS) applications for runoff and pollution management in the saemangeum area of Korea[J].Irrigation and Drainage,2016,65(2):168-174.
Bhattarai R, Kalita P K, Patel M K. Nutrient transport through a vegetative filter strip with subsurface drainage[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(5):1868-1876.
Dosskey M G, Vidon P, Gurwick N P, et al. The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical water quality in streams[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010,46(2):261-277.
Bortolozo F R, Favaretto N, Dieckow J, et al. Water, sediment and nutrient retention in native vegetative filter strips of Southern Brazil[J].International Journal of Plant and Soil Science,2015,4(5):2320-2334.
Deletic A. Sediment transport in urban runoff over grassed areas[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005, 301:108-122.
Mankin K R, Ngandu D M, Barden C J, et al. Grass-shrub riparian buffer removal of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from simulated runoff[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2007,43(5):1108-1116.
Pan C Z, Ma L, Wainwright J. Particle selectivity of sediment deposited over grass barriers and the effect of rainfall[J].Water Resources Research, 2016,52(10):7963-7979.
Deng N, Li H E, Shi D Q. Preliminary experimental study on effectiveness of vegetative filter strip to pollutants in surface runoff[J].Journal of Water Resource & Protection,2011,3(4):222-227.
0
浏览量
1299
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621