兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室, 兰州大学草地农业科技学院,兰州,730020
[ "刘宥延(1992-),女,博士研究生,主要从事生态服务功能评估研究。E-mail:liuyy19@lzu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
刘宥延, 刘兴元, 张博, 等. 黄土高原丘陵区人工灌草生态系统水土保持功能评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):84-90.
LIU Youyan, LIU Xingyuan, ZHANG Bo, et al. Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation Function of Artificial Shrub-Grassland Ecosystem in Hilly Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2020, 34(3): 84-90.
刘宥延, 刘兴元, 张博, 等. 黄土高原丘陵区人工灌草生态系统水土保持功能评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):84-90. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.014.
LIU Youyan, LIU Xingyuan, ZHANG Bo, et al. Evaluation of Soil and Water Conservation Function of Artificial Shrub-Grassland Ecosystem in Hilly Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2020, 34(3): 84-90. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.014.
人工灌草复合植被是黄土高原植被恢复与重建的主要植被类型,在该区域水土保持中发挥着重要的作用。以定西市安定区为例,基于InVEST模型对该区人工灌草生态系统的水土保持功能进行定量化评估,以期为黄土高原丘陵区生态恢复与水土资源的可持续利用提供决策支撑。评估结果为:(1)人工灌草地单位面积的水源涵养量为369.25 m3/hm2,是草地的90.5%、林地的134%和耕地的110%;该区的水源涵养总量为3 970.99×104 m3,人工灌草地水源涵养量占该区总水源涵养量的29.9%。(2)人工灌草地单位面积的N保持量为2.4 kg/hm2,净化率为72.21%,P保持量为0.12 kg/hm2,净化率为71.07%。(3)人工灌草地单位面积的土壤保持量为308.76 t/hm2,比草地、林地和耕地分别高1.88,1.44,6.01倍,该区的土壤保持总量为3 310.21×104 t,人工灌草地土壤保持量占总土壤保持量的54.82%。结果表明,人工灌草地的水源涵养能力仅次于草地,高于其他土地利用类型,但土壤保持能力是6种土地类型中最强的,具有较好的水土保持功能,是黄土高原丘陵区适宜的植被类型和土地利用方式。
Artificial shrub-grass composite vegetation is the main vegetation type of restoration and reconstruction in the Loess Plateau
which plays an important role in soil and water conservation in this region.As a case study in the Anding district of Dingxiin Gansu Province
the water and soil conservation function of the artificial shrub-grassland ecosystem was quantitatively evaluated based on InVEST model
and the results would provide decision support for ecological restoration and sustainable utilization of water and soil resources in the hilly region of the Loess Plateau.The assessment results were as follows (1) the water conservation amount per unit area of artificial shrub-grassland was 369.25 m3/hm2
which was 90.5% of grassland
134% of forest and 110% of cultivated land. The total water conservation amount of Anding district was 3 970.99×104m3
and artificial shrub- grassland accounted for 29.9% of the total water conservation in this area. (2) Nitrogen retention per unit area of shrub-grass land was 2.4 kg/hm2
the purification rate was 72.21%
and the phosphorus retention of artificial shrub-grassland was 0.12 kg/hm2
the purification rate was 71.07%. (3) The amount of soil conservation per unit area of artificial shrub-grassland was 308.76 t/hm2
which were 1.88 times
1.44 times and 6.01 times higher than that of grassland
forestand cultivated land
respectively.The total soil conservation amount was 3 310.21×104 t of Anding district
and artificial shrub-grassland accounted for 54.82% of the total soil conservation. The results showed that the water conservation capacity of artificial shrub-grassland was just lower than that of grassland
but higher than that of other land types
but the soil conservation capacity was the strongest in the six land types. Therefore
artificial shrub-grassland had better soil and water conservation function
which was the suitable vegetation type and land use mode in hilly region of the Loess Plateau.
张瑜,赵晓丽,左丽君,等.黄土高原生态系统服务价值动态评估与分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):170-176.
王川,刘春芳,乌亚汗,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务空间格局及权衡与协同关系:以榆中县为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(2):521-531.
冯磊,王治国,孙保平,等.黄土高原水土保持功能的重要性评价与分区[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(4):16-21.
邓景成,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土高原退耕还林工程对生态环境的影响及对策建议[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):63-68.
高旺盛,陈源泉,董孝斌.黄土高原生态系统服务功能的重要性与恢复对策探讨[J].水土保持学报, 2003,17(2):59-61.
卞鸿雁,庞奖励,任志远,等.基于土地利用变化的土壤保持效益时空动态:以黄土高原南部为例[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(9):2391-2396.
莫保儒,蔡国军,赵廷宁,等.甘肃半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区人工植被土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):125-128.
黄从红,杨军,张文娟.生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3360-3367.
Plummer M L. Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2009,7:38-45.
Vigerstol K L, Aukema J E. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92:2403-2409.
唐尧,祝炜平,张慧,等. InVEST模型原理及其应用研究进展[J].生态科学,2015,34(3):204-208.
Redhead J W, Stratford C, Sharps K, et al. Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,569:1418-1426.
张影.社会生态复合系统视角下的陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用多功能评价[D].兰州:兰州大学,2017.
刘彬彬,邸利,马晓燕,等.定西市安定区不同水土保持措施结构下综合效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):152-156.
魏静.定西市生态文明建设现状及对策研究[J].甘肃农业,2014(17):52-54.
包玉斌,李婷,柳辉,等.基于InVEST模型的陕北黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化[J].地理研究,2016,35(4):664-676.
胡胜,曹明明,刘琪,等.不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2393-2406.
党虹,葛丽娟,赵传燕,等.基于InVEST模型的称钩河流域土壤保持功能研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(5):633-639.
李屹峰,罗跃初,刘纲,等.土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响:以密云水库流域为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):726-736.
余新晓,周彬,吕锡芝,等.基于InVEST模型的北京山区森林水源涵养功能评估[J].林业科学,2012,48(10):1-5.
陈姗姗,刘康,李婷,等.基于InVEST模型的商洛市水土保持生态服务功能研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):800-807.
王国宏,张新时.从生态地理背景论草地畜牧业产业在黄土高原农业可持续发展中的战略地位[J].生态学报,2003,23(10):2018-2025.
侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐林枯落物水源涵养功能综合评价[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):251-257.
任志远,刘焱序.西北地区植被保持土壤效应评估[J].资源科学,2013,35(3):610-617.
Shukla A K, Pathak S, Pal L, et al. Spatio-temporal assessment of annual water balance models for upper Ganga Basin[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018,22(10):5357-5371.
张敏,刘爽,刘勇,等.黄土丘陵缓坡风沙区不同土地利用类型土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):115-128.
卞鸿雁,庞奖励,任志远,等.基于土地利用变化的土壤保持效益时空动态:以黄土高原南部为例[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(9):2391-2396.
侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363.
邓景成,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土高原退耕还林工程对生态环境的影响及对策建议[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):63-68.
0
浏览量
1172
下载量
14
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621