1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 重庆市水土保持监测总站,重庆,401147
4. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100053
[ "符素华(1973-),女,四川岳池人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail:suhua@bnu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
符素华, 张志兰, 蒋光毅, 等. 三峡库区水土流失综合治理优先小流域识别方法[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):79-83.
FU Suhua, ZHANG Zhilan, JIANG Guangyi, et al. Priority Watershed Determination Methods for Comprehensive Control of Soil and Water Conservation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2020, 34(3): 79-83.
符素华, 张志兰, 蒋光毅, 等. 三峡库区水土流失综合治理优先小流域识别方法[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):79-83. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.013.
FU Suhua, ZHANG Zhilan, JIANG Guangyi, et al. Priority Watershed Determination Methods for Comprehensive Control of Soil and Water Conservation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2020, 34(3): 79-83. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.013.
三峡库区水土流失严重,开展水土流失综合治理是减少入库泥沙和提高三峡工程综合效益的关键,而如何高效识别优先小流域,则是提高治理资金效益和科学决策的基础。以重庆市合川区为例,在区域土壤侵蚀评价的基础上,提出了水土流失面积法、土地利用-水土流失面积法和坡度-水土流失面积法3种优先小流域识别方法,并对其进行了比较分析。结果表明,坡度-水土流失面积法识别的优先小流域水土流失面积占比接近于水土流失面积法,同时又将坡度较大以及耕地、园地和采矿用地面积占比较大的小流域识别出来,纳入优先小流域中,是3种方法中最优的识别方法。研究结果可为三峡库区或同类型地区小流域水土流失治理规划与实施顺序决策提供借鉴和参考。
Serious soil erosion exists in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. The comprehensive control of soil and water conservation is the key measure for decreasing the sediment which flow into the Three Gorges Reservoir and improving the comprehensive benefit of the Three Gorges project.Effective identification of the small watershed (priority watershed) with serious soil erosion is the basis for improving the efficiency of fund utilization and scientific decision-making. In this study
Hechuan district in Chongqing was selected as a test area. The regional soil erosion was assessed. The priority watershed was then identified by soil loss area method
landuse-soil loss area method
and slope-soil loss area method. The parameters including the average soil loss area percentage
the percentage of different landuse and average slope degree were used to assess the priority watershed. The results showed that the average soil loss area percentage of priority watershed from slope-soil loss area method was close to those from soil loss area method. However
the priority watersheds with high slope gradient
greater area percentage of crop land
orchard land and mining land were also identified in the slope-soil loss area method. It indicates that the slope-soil loss area method was the best method for identifying priority watershed. The results could serve as the comprehensive soil and water conservation of small watersheds.
王伟,王玲玲,范东明.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型治理小流域水沙输移的尺度效应[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(8):108-112.
赵秦丹.略论西北黄土高原的水土保持工作[J].黄河建设,1957(5):9-13.
水利部.水土保持小流域治理办法(草案)[J].山西水土保持科技,1980(1):17-20.
刘震.扎实推进水土保持生态清洁小流域建设[J].中国水土保持,2010(1):5-6,13.
柳林夏.新常态下生态清洁小流域建设与思考[J].中国水土保持,2016(3):28-31.
蒲朝勇,高媛.生态清洁小流域建设现状与展望[J].中国水土保持,2015(6):7-10.
康贵良.天水市水土保持生态建设成效显著[J].中国水土保持,2016(1):33.
齐斐,胡续礼,刘霞,等.基于小流域划分的沂源县水土保持规划布局及措施配置[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):129-135,144.
姚孝友,袁利,吴迪,等.土地流转后农业经营模式转变下的小流域综合治理[J].中国水土保持,2015(9):15-17.
周萍,文安邦,贺秀斌,等.三峡库区循环农业及流域水土保持综合治理模式研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(10):5-7,71.
毛华平,杨兰蓉,许人骥,等.三峡水库库周生态屏障建设对策研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):63-68,72.
罗凤,郭宏忠.重庆市水土保持成效和新时代发展战略思考[J].中国水土保持,2018(12):42-45.
郭宏忠,冯明汉,赵健,等.三峡库区水土流失防治分区及防治对策[J].西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,8(3):25-27.
曾肇京,王俊英.关于流域等级划分的探讨[J].水利规划,1996(1):1-5.
Sheng T C, Barrett R E, Mitchell T R. Using geographic information systems for watershed classification and rating in developing countries[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,52(2):83-89.
Silva R M D, Montenegro S M G L, Santos C A G. Integration of GIS and remote sensing for estimation of soil loss and prioritization of critical sub-catchments:A case study of Tapacurá catchment[J]. Natural Hazards,2012,62(3):953-970.
刘宝元,郭索彦,李智广,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):26-34.
中华人民共和国水利部水土保持司.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准(SL 190-2007)[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
符素华,刘宝元,周贵云,等.坡长坡度因子计算工具[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):105-110.
0
浏览量
1122
下载量
15
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621