电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较

王朋顺; 刘莉; 李忠意; 严宁珍; 程永毅

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.049

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较
- Effect of Electrodialysis and Acid Leaching on the Acidification of Purple Soil
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第2期页码：348-353
- 作者机构：
  
  西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王朋顺(1994-),男,安徽宿州人,主要从事土壤化学研究。E-mail:18166592715@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41701256）中国博士后科学基金项目（2017M610584，2018T110938）重庆市博士后项目（Xm2016076）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.049
  中图分类号： S151.9
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王朋顺, 刘莉, 李忠意, 等. 电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):348-353.

WANG Pengshun, LIU Li, LI Zhongyi, et al. Effect of Electrodialysis and Acid Leaching on the Acidification of Purple Soil[J]. 2020, 34(2): 348-353.
王朋顺, 刘莉, 李忠意, 等. 电渗析与酸淋洗模拟紫色土酸化的效果比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):348-353. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.049.

WANG Pengshun, LIU Li, LI Zhongyi, et al. Effect of Electrodialysis and Acid Leaching on the Acidification of Purple Soil[J]. 2020, 34(2): 348-353. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.049.

摘要

为了比较电渗析与酸淋洗试验模拟紫色土酸化的效果，在重庆地区采集了不同pH （5.00和7.06）的2个紫色土，分别进行不同天数（1，2，5，7，10天）的电渗析和酸淋洗试验处理，并分析了试验处理前后土壤的酸度特征和交换性盐基成分含量变化。结果表明，在整个10天的淋溶处理过程中，2种紫色土的pH均无显著变化，说明紫色土具有一定的酸缓冲能力，短期的酸雨淋溶不能实现紫色土的严重酸化。而采用电渗析处理10天后，中性紫色土和酸性紫色土的pH分别降低3.4和1.1个单位。在整个电渗析处理过程中，土壤的交换性酸含量显著升高，盐基离子大量淋失。电渗析可以实现对紫色土的快速酸化处理。2种紫色土中，电渗析处理后中性紫色土的酸化程度大于酸性紫色土。这是由于中性紫色土的表面负电荷量更高，导致更多致酸离子吸附在土壤胶体表面，最终造成中性紫色土的酸化程度更加严重。因此，电渗析处理比酸雨淋溶处理对紫色土酸化效果更好，且可用于紫色土的酸化机理研究。进一步结合2种方法的技术可操作性，认为电渗析法是研究紫色土酸化问题的一种有效技术手段。

Abstract

In order to better understand the effects of electrodialysis and acid leaching treatments on the acidification process of purple soils

an acid purple soil with the pH value of 5.00 and a neutral purple soil with the pH value of 7.06 collected in Chongqing were treated by electrodialysis and acid leaching treatments for different days (1

7 and 10 days

respectively). The variation of soil acidity and exchangeable base cations during these treatment processes were analyzed. The results showed that the pH values of both acid purple soil and neutral purple did not change significantly. This could be attributed to the high acid buffering capacity. The purple soils could not be acidified in a short-term acid rain leaching. Differently

after 10-day electrodialysis treatment

the pH values of acid purple soil and neutral purple soil decreased by 3.4 and 1.1

respectively. In the electrodialysis process

the soil exchangeable acidity increased significantly and the content of exchangeable base cations decreased greatly. It was indicated that electrodialysis could be used to rapidly acidify purple soil. The acidification degree of neutral purple soil after electrodialysis treatment was higher than that of acid purple soil. This was because the amount of negative surface charge of neutral purple soil was higher than that of acid purple soil

which caused that more acidic ions (H+ and Al3+) were adsorbed on the surface of neutral soil

correspondingly

resulting in the increased acidified degree of neutral purple soil. Therefore

compared to acid leaching treatment

electrodialysis treatment was a more effective way to acidify the purple soil in a short time. It also could help us to reveal the acidification mechanism of purple soil. After taking the feasibility of electrodialysis and acid leaching treatments into account

it was concluded that electrodialysis was an effective technique to study the acidification of purple soil.

关键词

Keywords

references

徐仁扣.土壤酸化及其调控研究进展[J].土壤,2015,47(2):238-244.

Zhao X Q, Chen R F, Shen R F. Coadaptation of plants to multiple stresses in acidic soils[J].Soil Science,2014,179(10/11):503-513.

Zhu Q C, Vries D W, Liu X, et al. The contribution of atmospheric deposition and forest harvesting to forest soil acidification in China since 1980[J].Atmospheric Environment,2016,146:215-222.

Butchee K, Arnall D B, Sutradhar A, et al. Determining Critical Soil pH for Grain Sorghum Production[J]. International Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 2012:1-6.

Zhao F J, Ma Y, Zhu Y G, et al. Soil contamination in China:Current status and mitigation strategies[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2015,49(2):750-759.

李忠意,程永毅,杨剑虹.重庆地区中性紫色土酸化特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6):234-237.

Duan L, Chen X, Ma X, et al. Atmospheric S and N deposition relates to increasing riverine transport of S and N in southwest China:Implications for soil acidification[J].Environmental Pollution,2016,218:1191-1199.

汪文强,王子芳,高明,等.施氮对紫色土交换性酸及盐基饱和度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):138-142.

Li J Y, Xu R K. Inhibition of acidification of kaolinite and an Alfisol by aluminum oxides through electrical double-layer interaction and coating[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2013,64:110-120.

Yuan J H, Xu R K, Qian W, et al. Comparison of the ameliorating effects on an acidic Ultisol between four crop straws and their biochars[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2011,11:741-750.

Blake L, Goulding K W T, Mott C J B, et al. Changes in soil chemistry accompanying acidification over more than 100 years under woodland and grass at Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2010,50(3):401-412.

于伟家,李雪松,陈竹君,等.氮肥对不同无机碳含量土壤二氧化碳释放的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2493-2500.

凌大炯,章家恩,黄倩春,等.模拟酸雨对砖红壤盐基离子迁移和释放的影响[J].土壤学报,2007,44(3):444-450.

Liao B H, Guo Z H,Zeng Q R, et al. Effects of acid rain on competitive releases of Cd, Cu, and Zn from two natural soils and two contaminated soils in Hunan, China[J].Water, Air, and Soil Pollution:Focus,2007,7(1/3):151-161.

李九玉,徐仁扣.一种模拟土壤自然酸化的方法:中国,CN102580539A[P].2012.

程永毅,李忠意,白颖艳,等.电渗析法研究紫色土、黄壤和砖红壤的酸化特征[J].中国农业科学2018,51(7):1325-1333.

韦杨嫣,卢升高.电动模拟土壤酸化及其交换性离子组成变化[J].土壤通报,2017,48(3):618-622.

Li J Y, Xu R K, Zhang H. Iron oxides serve as natural anti-acidification agents in highly weathered soils[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2012,12(6):876-887.

汪吉东,高秀美,陈丹艳,等.不同pH降雨淋溶对原状水稻土土壤酸化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):118-122.

Yang X D, Ni K, Shi Y Z, et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen application on soil acidification and solution chemistry of a tea plantation in China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2018,252:74-82.

王朋顺,李忠意,冯勃,等.微地形下紫色土的矿物组成和pH的耦合特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):310-314.

席承藩.土壤分类学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:238-243.

刘俐,周友亚,宋存义,等.模拟酸雨淋溶下红壤中盐基离子释放及缓冲机制研究[J].环境科学研究,2008,2:49-55.

范庆锋,张玉龙,陈重,等.保护地土壤酸度特征及酸化机制研究[J].土壤学报,2009,46(3):466-471.

Breemen N V, Driscoll C T, Mulder J. Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters[J].Nature, 1984,307(5952):599-604.

Cai J P, Luo W T, Liu H Y. Precipitation-mediated responses of soil acid buffering capacity to long-term nitrogen addition in a semi-arid grassland[J].Atmospheric Environment,2017,170:312-318.

Mao Q G, Lu X K, Zhou K J, et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen and phosphorus additions on soil acidification in an N-rich tropical forest[J].Geoderma,2017,285:57-63.

Chen W Q, Xu R, Hu T M, et al. Soil-mediated effects of acidification as the major driver of species loss following N enrichment in a semi-arid grassland[J].Plant and Soil,2017,419(1/2):541-556.

赵越,杨金玲,董岳,等.模拟酸雨淋溶下强风化土壤矿物风化计量关系研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(2):310-319.

刘志彦,杨俊兴,周炎武,等.模拟酸雨对红树林底泥中营养元素及Cu、Zn分布的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(19):6209-6217.

浏览量

1120

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

微地形下紫色土的矿物组成和pH的耦合特征

东北黑土地保护成效、土壤酸化问题及其对策建议

模拟降雨下植物篱-草沟系统茎秆直径对紫色土区泥沙粒径与氮磷迁移的影响

低分子量有机酸浸提对紫色土金属阳离子

紫色土区不同农林复合模式土壤入渗特征及影响因素