添加剂对不同还田深度秸秆腐解及周际土壤环境的影响

曲晓晶; 孙大雁; 吴南; 张冲; 张小峰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.037

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

添加剂对不同还田深度秸秆腐解及周际土壤环境的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 添加剂对不同还田深度秸秆腐解及周际土壤环境的影响
- Effects of Additives on Straw Decomposition and Its Surrounding Soil Environment Under Different Returning Depths
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第2期页码：261-268
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 吉林市农业科学院,吉林,吉林,132101
  2. 吉林省农业机械研究院,长春,130022
  3. 上海创博土壤修复工程有限公司,上海,201101
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "曲晓晶(1980-),女,副高级研究员,主要从事农业资源与环境研究。E-mail:qxj8111@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFD0300205）农业部重点实验室开放基金项目（KLPN201801-03）吉林省科技发展计划项目（20170204018NY）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.037
  中图分类号： S154
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
曲晓晶, 孙大雁, 吴南, 等. 添加剂对不同还田深度秸秆腐解及周际土壤环境的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):261-268.

QU Xiaojing, SUN Dayan, WU Nan, et al. Effects of Additives on Straw Decomposition and Its Surrounding Soil Environment Under Different Returning Depths[J]. 2020, 34(2): 261-268.
曲晓晶, 孙大雁, 吴南, 等. 添加剂对不同还田深度秸秆腐解及周际土壤环境的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):261-268. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.037.

QU Xiaojing, SUN Dayan, WU Nan, et al. Effects of Additives on Straw Decomposition and Its Surrounding Soil Environment Under Different Returning Depths[J]. 2020, 34(2): 261-268. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.037.

摘要

探讨添加剂对秸秆腐解及其形成的土壤环境的影响，以明确促进秸秆腐解的同时，利于土壤固碳的添加剂最佳配方。以玉米秸秆为供试材料，进行了150天的田间原位埋袋腐解试验，对比研究3种类型添加剂（尿素、生物菌腐解剂和微量元素调理剂）对15，30 cm还田秸秆腐解过程及其形成的土壤环境因素的影响。结果表明：（1）添加剂极显著影响碳损失量（p<0.01），直接影响秸秆腐解程度及其释放碳素在土壤中的固持，还田深度则通过影响含水量影响失重，含水量与失重显著负相关（r=-0.51），SOC与碳损失量接近于线性负相关（r=-0.94），与C/N极显著正相关（r=0.72），C/N与碳损失量极显著负相关（r=-0.53）；（2）微量元素添加剂既提高了前期土壤的含水量，又减缓了后期水分的散失，但添加剂有加速土壤酸化的趋势，15 cm还田时微量元素添加剂表现更明显，30 cm还田时生物菌添加剂表现更明显；（3）添加剂加速了秸秆的腐解，但减少了碳损失量，150天时，15，30 cm还田其碳损失量平均值分别比对照减少3.4%和4.8%，有利于土壤固碳，其中，生物菌添加剂更有利于15 cm还田秸秆的腐解，氮素添加剂有利于30 cm还田秸秆的腐解；（4）添加剂减缓了秸秆腐解产物的流失，尤其是生物菌添加剂和微量元素添加剂，15 cm还田时生物菌添加剂有利于土壤固碳，微量元素添加剂更利于有机碳的更新，而30 cm还田时则相反。

Abstract

In order to explore the optimum additive formula that promotes straw decomposition and soil carbon sequestration

the effects of additives on the straw decomposition and its surrounding soil environment were studied. We chose corn stalks as test materials to carry out the burial bag in-situ decomposition experiment for 150 days. The effects of three types of additives (urea

biological bacteria decomposition accelerator and trace element conditioner) on the decomposing process of 15 cm and 30 cm depth returning straw and the soil environmental factors were studied. The results showed that:(1) Additives significantly affected the amount of carbon loss (p<0.01)

directly affecting the degree of straw decomposing and the release of carbon in the soil. The depth of returning to the field affected the weight loss by affecting the water content

and the water content was significantly negatively correlated with the weight loss (r=-0.51). SOC and carbon loss were close to a linear negative correlation (r=-0.94)

and SOC was significantly positively correlated with C/N (r=0.72)

and C/N was significantly negatively correlated with carbon loss (r=-0.53). (2) The trace element additive not only improved soil water content in the early stage

but also slowed the loss of water in the later stage. However

the additive had the tendency to accelerate soil acidification. The effect of trace element additive was more obvious at the depth of 15 cm

but the biological additive worked better at 30 cm depth. (3) The additives accelerated the decomposition of the straw but reduced the carbon loss. After 150 days

the average carbon loss of 15 cm and 30 cm depth returning to the field were reduced by 3.4% and 4.8%

respectively

which was conducive to soil carbon sequestration. Among them

the biological bacteria additive was more conducive to the decomposing of 15 cm returning straw

and the nitrogen additive was more conducive to the decomposing of 30 cm depth returning straw. (4) The additives slowed down the loss of the straw decomposing products

especially the biological bacteria additives and trace element. When the 15 cm depth returning field was used

the biological bacteria additive was more conducive to soil carbon sequestration

and the trace element additive was more conducive to the renewal of organic carbon

while the 30 cm depth returning was the opposite.

关键词

Keywords

references

张杰.秸秆、木质素及生物炭对土壤有机碳氮和微生物多样性的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院研究生院,2015.

Humberto B C, Lal R. Soil structure and organic carbon relationships following 10 years of wheat straw management in no-till[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2007,95:240-254.

Van Z L, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of paper mill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility[J].Plant and Soil,2010,327(1/2):235-246.

翟修彩.不同化学添加剂对秸秆腐解产物的影响及其应用研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2012.

曲晓晶,吴景贵,李建明,等.外源有机碳对黑土有机碳及颗粒有机碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):278-286.

匡恩俊,迟凤琴,宿庆瑞,等.3种腐熟剂促进玉米秸秆快速腐解特征[J].农业资源与环境学报,2014,31(5):432-436.

孙旭,汝超杰,苏良湖,等.3种秸秆腐熟剂微生物组成及其腐熟效果[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(3):212-215.

Jusoh M L C, Manaf L A, Latiff P A. Composting of rice straw with effective microorganisms (EM) and its influence on compost quality[J].Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering,2013,10:17-25.

庞赟佶,李腾飞,陈义胜,等.矿物质添加剂对玉米秸秆粉末催化热解特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(14):221-226.

徐学池,苏以荣,王桂红,等.秸秆还田配施氮肥对喀斯特农田微生物群落及有机碳矿化的影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(6):2912-2919.

鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.

翟修彩,刘明,李忠佩,等.不同添加剂处理秸秆腐解产物对土壤生物活性和花生苗生长的影响[J].土壤通报,2014,45(4):925-929.

Smider B, Singh B. Agronomic performance of a high ash biochar in two contrasting soils[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2014,191:99-107.

姚名泽,成自勇,王峰,等.不同灌溉制度对机采棉水分运移、产量及品质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(6):67-72.

冉冬梅,白善军,曹炳宏.4种秸秆腐熟剂的腐熟效果比较[J].现代农业科技,2017(13):193-194.

Fernández-Gálvez J, Gálvez A, Peña A, et al. Soil hydrophysical properties resulting from the interaction between organic amendments and water quality in soils from Southeastern Spain:A laboratory experiment[J].Agricultural Water Management,2012,104:104-112.

马斌,刘景辉,杨彦明.连续施用保水材料对旱作条件下土壤特性及燕麦生长的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(17):5650-5661.

陈天助.深埋秸秆和覆膜对田间土壤水分分布及玉米产量的影响研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.

董博,周欢,蔡立群,等.免耕条件下不同有机物料还田对土壤有机碳及微生物量碳含量的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2015(1):12-14.

薄欣,臧淑英,张玉兰,等.松嫩平原北部不同含水量梯度下土壤有机碳含量空间特征分析[J].城市地理,2017(4):130.

Qu X J, Wu J G, Zhao J H, et al. Effects of solid organic wastes on soil particulate organic carbon structure under different water conditions[J].Clean Soil Air Water,2019,47(8):1-9.

张莉,李玉义,逢焕成,等.玉米秸秆颗粒还田对土壤有机碳含量和作物产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(2):160-168.

张先风,朱安宁,张佳宝,等.耕作管理对潮土团聚体形成及有机碳累积的长期效应[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4639-4648.

高洪军,彭畅,张秀芝,等.不同秸秆还田模式对黑钙土团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):75-79.

Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation:A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32:2099-2103.

田平,姜英,孙悦,等.不同还田方式对玉米秸秆腐解及土壤养分含量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2019,27(1):100-108.

张经廷,张丽华,吕丽华,等.还田作物秸秆腐解及其养分释放特征概述[J].核农学报,2018,32(11):2274-2280.

李艳,李玉梅,刘峥宇,等.秸秆还田对连作玉米黑土团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响[J].土壤与作物,2019,8(2):129-138.

浏览量

1177

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

秸秆还田与种植密度对玉米氮素吸收利用与产量的影响

施肥对我国盐碱土壤基础理化性质的影响

不同耕作方式下秸秆还田对晋中玉米田水分时空分布及产量的影响

秸秆还田替代化肥对黄土旱塬小麦产量及水肥利用的影响

基于旋耕玉米秸秆还田条件下土壤微生物、酶及速效养分的动态特征