内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特,010018
[ "范雷雷(1993-),男,博士研究生,主要从事节水灌溉理论与新技术研究。E-mail:624775767@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
范雷雷, 史海滨, 李瑞平, 等. 精细水平畦灌灌水质量及效益评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):138-145.
FAN Leilei, SHI Haibin, LI Ruiping, et al. Irrigation Performance and Benefit Evaluation of Fine Horizontal Field Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation District[J]. 2020, 34(2): 138-145.
范雷雷, 史海滨, 李瑞平, 等. 精细水平畦灌灌水质量及效益评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):138-145. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.020.
FAN Leilei, SHI Haibin, LI Ruiping, et al. Irrigation Performance and Benefit Evaluation of Fine Horizontal Field Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation District[J]. 2020, 34(2): 138-145. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.020.
针对河套灌区宽畦田、大畦块导致的灌水效率低的问题,为探求变化环境下适宜畦田规格参数,通过不同畦宽下的精细水平畦灌灌水试验,分析了水流运动状态、灌水质量以及成本效益等变化情况。结果表明:(1)畦宽对土壤入渗水深以及灌水质量均有较大影响,畦宽为23 m时水流推进时间延长,畦首入渗水深增大,有效水利用效率BWUF和灌水均匀度Du仅有59.78%~77.40%,84.61%~87.02%,灌水效果不佳;畦宽缩小到10~15 m时,BWUF和Du分别增加11.96%~20.61%和2.49%~5.95%,灌水质量有显著提高;畦宽缩小到5 m时,相对入畦单宽流量增大,大量灌溉水聚集在畦尾,使得畦尾入渗水深增加,畦首入渗不足,导致田面水流分布不均匀,灌水质量降低。(2)通过分析各处理成本构成以及产量效益情况,可以发现农业生产中花费最大的仍然是化肥、种子、地膜等其他费用,占到总种植成本Tc的70%以上;实施激光平地和缩宽等措施后田埂数量增加,导致机械成本较当地对照处理增加0.3~4.6倍,尽管水费略有减少,但Tc仍增加2.72%~9.98%。(3)在开展节水试验时,其节水效果和经济效益通常是矛盾的,节水效果好的方案往往经济效益较差,而节水效果较差的方案其经济效益反而会有所提高,建议在灌区推广节水新技术时按照1 095~1 665元/hm2的补贴标准对农民发放节水补贴进而来增加农民积极性。(4)通过分析经济、节水效益不同权重组合下的综合效益函数,初步确定在进行方案优选时,若优先考虑节水可适当缩小畦宽,若优先考虑经济效益可适当放大畦宽,均可使其综合效益达到最大。研究结果可为灌区农业高效可持续发展提供理论依据。
Aiming at the low irrigation efficiency of farmland irrigation and drainage system layout in Hetao Irrigation District
this paper explored the suitable design scheme of border irrigation under changing environment. This paper analysed the state of water flow movement
irrigation performance
and cost-effectiveness by carrying out the fine horizontal irrigation field experiment under different widths. The results showed that:(1) Different widths have great influence on soil infiltration depth and irrigation performance. When the width of the border was large
the water flow advancement time was prolonged
and the water depth of the furrow head infiltration increased
resulting in poor overall irrigation effect. By 10~15 m
the effective water use efficiency and irrigation uniformity increased by 11.96%~20.61% and 2.49%~5.95%
respectively
and the irrigation performance was significantly improved. When the width was reduced to 5 m
the relative flow rate of the single inlet increased. Irrigation water accumulated in the furrow tail
which increases the depth of the infiltration of the furrow tail
and the infiltration of the furrow head was insufficient
which leads to a decrease in the performance of irrigation. (2) By analysing the composition of each treatment cost and the yield benefit
it could be found that the most expensive expenditure in agricultural production is still other costs such as fertilizer
seeds
and films
accounting for more than 70% of the total plant cost. After the increase in the number of ridges
the mechanical cost increased by 0.3~4.6 times compared with the local traditional level. Although the water fee decreased slightly
the total cost Tc increased by 2.72%~9.98%. (3) When water-saving experiments were carried out
the water-saving benefits and economic benefits were usually contradictory. The water-saving and good-efficiency schemes tend to have poor economic benefits
while the schemes with poor water-saving benefits had improved economic benefits
it is recommended to increase the enthusiasm of farmers by granting water-saving subsidies to farmers in accordance with the subsidy standard of 1 095~1 665 yuan/hm2 when promoting new water-saving technologies in irrigation districts. (4) In this paper
by analysing the comprehensive benefit function under the combination of different weights of economy and water saving benefits
it is preliminarily determined that when the optimization of each treatment scheme is made
if the water saving benefit is prioritized
the width should be appropriately narrowed
and if the economic benefit is prioritized
the width should be appropriately enlarged.The results should provide theoretical support for water saving reform design and sustainable development of agriculture.
付雯琪,翟家齐,赵勇,等.河套灌区种植结构变化对农田系统水量平衡的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(1):1-8.
黄权中,徐旭,吕玲娇,等.基于遥感反演河套灌区土壤盐分分布及对作物生长的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(1):102-109.
李益农,许迪,李福祥,等.农田土地激光平整技术应用及初步评价[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(2):79-84.
李福祥,许迪.农田土地平整方法的组合应用及效果[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(2):50-53.
徐睿智,魏占民,夏玉红,等.激光精细平地对畦田灌水质量的影响及节水效果分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(2):6-9.
苗庆丰,史海滨.内蒙古河套灌区地面灌溉技术评价及优化决策研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015.
白岗栓,杜社妮,于健,等.激光平地改善土壤水盐分布并提高春小麦产量[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):125-134.
李益农,许迪,李福祥,等.激光控制土地精平技术规模化应用效果评价[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(5):69-73.
白美健,许迪,李益农.水平畦田微地形空间变异性对灌溉系统的影响[J].水利学报,2007,38(10):1194-1199.
聂卫波,费良军,马孝义.土壤入渗特性和田面糙率的变异性对沟灌性能的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(1):108-114.
梁建财,史海滨,李瑞平,等.覆盖对盐渍土壤冻融特性与秋浇灌水质量的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(4):98-105.
郑和祥,史海滨,程满金,等.畦田灌水质量评价及水分利用效率分析[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):1-6.
白寅祯,魏占民,张健,等.基于WinSRFR软件的河套灌区水平畦田规格的优化[J].排灌机械工程学报,2016,34(9):823-828.
郑和祥,史海滨,朱敏,等.基于SIRMOD模型的畦灌入渗参数估算及灌溉模拟[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):29-34.
Gaiser T, Barros I D, Lange F M, et al. Water use efficiency of a maize/cowpea intercrop on a highly acidic tropical soil as affected by liming and fertilizer application[J].Plant and Soil,2004,263(1/2):165-171.
Goncalves J M, Muga A P, Rodrigues G C, et al. Web-based decision support system for irrigation design:Models integration for surface and set sprinkler systems[C]//Soil and Water Engineering. International Conference of Agricultural Engineering-CIGR-AgEng 2012:Agriculture and engineering for a healthier life, Valencia, Spain, July 8-12,2012, CIGR-EurAgEng, 2012.
Gonçalves J M, Horst M G, Pereira L S, et al. SADREG, a DSS for Improving Surface Irrigation Systems[C]//Proceedings of the EFITA/WCCA 2005 Joint Conference on Information Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment and Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources,2005:160-165.
Miao Q, Shi H, Goncalves J M, et al. Basin irrigation design with multi-criteria analysis focusing on water saving and economic returns:Application to wheat in Hetao, Yellow river basin[J].Water,2018,10(1):67-89.
刘静,吴普特,王玉宝,等.基于数据包络分析的河套灌区农业生产效率评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(9):110-118.
0
浏览量
1248
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621