林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响

兰航宇; 段文标; 陈立新; 曲美学; 王亚飞; 赵戈榕

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响
- Effects of Forest Type, Microsite Type and Soil Properties on Soil Erosion Resistance
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第2期页码：108-114
- 作者机构：
  
  东北林业大学林学院,哈尔滨,150040
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "兰航宇(1995-),女,在校硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:lanhangyuchen@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31670627，31270666）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.016
  中图分类号： S715.3
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
兰航宇, 段文标, 陈立新, 等. 林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):108-114.

LAN Hangyu, DUAN Wenbiao, CHEN Lixin, et al. Effects of Forest Type, Microsite Type and Soil Properties on Soil Erosion Resistance[J]. 2020, 34(2): 108-114.
兰航宇, 段文标, 陈立新, 等. 林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):108-114. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.016.

LAN Hangyu, DUAN Wenbiao, CHEN Lixin, et al. Effects of Forest Type, Microsite Type and Soil Properties on Soil Erosion Resistance[J]. 2020, 34(2): 108-114. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.016.

摘要

采用原状土冲刷水槽法和静水崩解法测定土壤抗冲性和抗蚀性，以云冷杉红松林（PA）和椴树红松林（TP）的林隙和郁闭林分为对照，分析了小兴安岭地区2种林型由掘根倒木形成的不同丘和坑微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗冲性和抗蚀性的影响，旨在揭示它们与土壤抗侵蚀能力的关系。结果表明：在2种林型下由掘根倒木形成的丘和坑微立地上，土壤砂粒含量均较高，其抗侵蚀能力均较弱，而对照却相反；2种林型下丘和坑微立地的土壤容重均与土壤抗冲性和抗蚀性呈无显著的负相关（P>0.05），而PA对照的土壤容重与它们均呈不显著正相关（P>0.05），TP林隙的土壤容重与它们却呈极显著正相关（P<0.01），其郁闭林分的土壤容重与它们呈极显著负相关；2种林型下丘和坑微立地的土壤有机质均与土壤抗冲性和抗蚀性呈不显著正相关，而对照则呈极显著正相关；土壤抗侵蚀能力随着林型和微立地类型而变化，TP丘和坑微立地的土壤抗侵蚀能力不显著高于PA，而PA对照的土壤抗侵蚀能力却显著高于TP的对照。由此可知，丘和坑微立地的形成会造成土壤抗侵蚀能力大幅下降，导致土壤养分的流失，土壤黏粒含量减少，土壤恢复过程较为困难。

Abstract

Soil anti-scouribility and anti-erodibility were measured by undisturbed soil washing flume method and static water disintegration method. The gap and canopy stand of Picea koraiensis-Abies nephrolepis-Pinus koraiensis forest (PA) and Tilia amurensis-Pinus koraiensis forest (TP) were taken as contrasts to analyze the effects of different pit and mound microsites formed by uprooted trees and soil properties on soil anti-scouribility and anti-erodibility in Xiaoxing'an Mountains

and reveal the relationship between them. The results showed that in the pit and mound microsites of the two forests

the soil sand content was higher and the soil erosion resistance was weaker

but the trends were opposite in the contrast. There was no significant negative correlation between soil bulk density and soil anti-scouribility and anti-erodibility (P>0.05) in the two types of microsite of the two forests

while there was no significant positive correlation between soil bulk density and soil anti-scouribility and anti-erodibility in the gap of the PA (P>0.05). In the TP

the soil bulk density was extremely significantly positively correlated with soil anti-scouribility and anti-erodibility in the gap

while in the canopy stand

the soil bulk density was extremely significantly negatively correlated with them (P<0.01). There was no significant positive correlation between soil organic matter and soil erosion resistance in the two types of microsite

but there was an extremely significant positive correlation between them in the contrast stand. Soil erosion resistance varied with forest types and microsite types

the soil erosion resistance of TP pit and mound microsites was not significantly higher than that of PA. But the soil erosion resistance of PA contrast was significantly higher than that of TP contrast. It can be concluded that the formation ofpit and mound microsites would lead a significant decline in soil erosion resistance

resulting in the loss of soil nutrients

the reduction of soil clay content

and the process of soil restoration was difficult.

关键词

Keywords

references

Plotkin A B, Schoonmaker P, Leon B, et al. Microtopography and ecology of pit-mound structures in second-growth versus old-growth forests[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2017,404:14-23.

Šamonil P, Valtera M, Schaetzl R J, et al. Impacts of old, comparatively stable, treethrow microtopography on soils and forest dynamics in the northern hardwoods of Michigan, USA[J].Catena,2016,140:55-65.

Šamonil P, Král K, Hort L. The role of tree uprooting in soil formation:A critical literature review[J]. Geoderma,2010,157(3/4):65-79.

Phillips J D, Šamonil P, Pawlik Ł, et al. Domination of hillslope denudation by tree uprooting in an old-growth forest[J].Geomorphology,2017,276:27-36.

Hancock G R, Evans K G, McDonnell J, et al. Ecohydrological controls on soil erosion and landscape evolution[J].Ecohydrology,2012,5(4):478-490.

De Baets S, Poesen J, Knapen A, et al. Impact of root architecture on the erosion-reducing potential of roots during concentrated flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2007,32(9):1323-1345.

张杰,郑太辉,肖胜生,等.不同植被恢复模式对红砂岩土壤化学性质及抗蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(24):115-122.

寇萌,焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区抵抗土壤侵蚀的植物群落结构特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):7-14.

王润泽,谌芸,李铁,等.香根草和马唐的根系特征及对坡地紫色土抗侵蚀性的影响[J].草业学报,2017,26(7):45-54.

李超,周正朝,朱冰冰,等.黄土丘陵区不同撂荒年限土壤入渗及抗冲性研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):61-66.

郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米季土壤抗冲性变化特征及其影响因素分析[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(9):180-186.

Zadrozny P, Halecki W, Gasiorek M, et al. Vertical pit-mounds distribution of uprooted Norway spruce (

Picea abies

L.):Field evidence in the upper mountain belt[J].Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry,2017,10:783-787.

Plotkin A B, Foster D, Carlson J, et al. Survivors, not invaders, control forest development following simulated hurricane[J].Ecology,2013,94(2):414-423.

吴克宁,赵瑞.土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):227-241.

刘志,杨瑞,裴仪岱.喀斯特高原峡谷区顶坛花椒与金银花林地土壤抗侵蚀特征[J].土壤学报,2019,56(2):466-474.

郭明明,王文龙,康宏亮,等.黄土高塬沟壑区植被自然恢复年限对坡面土壤抗冲性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(22):138-146.

孙梅.黄运湘.孙楠.等.农田土壤孔隙及其影响因素研究进展[J].土壤通报,2015,46(1):233-238.

徐文远,刘玉花,王晓春,等.G111公路讷嫩段9种护坡灌木根系增强土壤抗蚀性比较[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):72-77.

史东梅,陈晏.紫色丘陵区农林混作模式的土壤抗冲性影响因素[J].中国农业科学,2008(5):1400-1409.

张素,熊东红,校亮,等.冲沟不同部位土壤机械组成及抗冲性差异[J].土壤,2016,48(6):1270-1276.

蒲玉琳,谢德体,林超文,等.植物篱-农作模式坡耕地土壤综合抗蚀性特征[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(18):125-135.

康玲玲,王云璋,刘雪,等.水土保持措施对土壤化学特性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):46-48.

王一峰,张平仓,朱兵兵,等.长江中上游地区土壤抗冲性特征研究[J].长江科学院院报,2007,24(1):12-15.

周维,张建辉,李勇,等.金沙江干暖河谷不同土地利用条件下土壤抗冲性研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(5):26-30.

任书杰,曹明奎,陶波,等.陆地生态系统氮状态对碳循环的限制作用研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(4):58-67.

段文标,曲美学,陈立新,等.云冷杉林林隙内倒木腐烂等级及其形成的微立地类型对土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):3977-3985.

李佳,黄梦静,任艳,等.水分胁迫对向水性突变体rhe2根生长与响应的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(5):858-862.

孙波,廖红,苏彦华,等.土壤-根系-微生物系统中影响氮磷利用的一些关键协同机制的研究进展[J].土壤,2015,47(2):210-219.

Boivin P, Schäffer B, Sturny W. Quantifying the relationship between soil organic carbon and soil physical properties using shrinkage modelling[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2009,60(2):265-275.

Cotrufo M F, Wallenstein M D, Boot C M, et al. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization:Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?[J].Global Change Biology,2013,19(4):988-995.

Castellano M J, Mueller K E, Olk D C, et al. Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization, and the carbon saturation concept[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(9):3200-3209.

甘卓亭,叶佳,周旗,等.模拟降雨下草地植被调控坡面土壤侵蚀过程[J].生态学报,2010,30(9):2387-2396.

Vodde F, Jogiste K, Engelhart J, et al. Impact of wind-induced microsites and disturbance severity on tree regeneration patterns:Results from the first post-storm decade[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2015,348:174-185.

Thomas W S, Schaetzl R J, Brixie J M. Redistribution and mixing of soil gravels by tree uprooting[J].The Professional Geographer,2005,42(4):445-457.

Zhang H D, Zhang R H, Qi F, et al. The CSLE model based soil erosion prediction:Comparisons of sampling density and extrapolation method at the county level[J].Catena,2018,165:465-472.

浏览量

1181

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟侵蚀、施肥和采样时间对东北黑土区土壤性质和质量的影响

冻融条件下土壤侵蚀阻力影响因素

不同氮素用量对高肥力稻田水稻-土壤-水体氮素变化及环境影响分析

某铅锌冶炼厂废弃地复垦整理区土壤重金属污染评价

宁南山区植被自然恢复中土壤团聚体特征及其与土壤性质关系