1. 广西大学农学院,南宁,530004
2. 广西壮族自治区水土保持监测站,南宁,530023
3. 山东省水土保持与环境保育重点实验室, 临沂大学资源环境学院,山东,临沂,276005
[ "李桂芳(1987-),女,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤侵蚀及其环境效应研究。E-mail:lifangdyx@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
李桂芳, 杨任翔, 谢福倩, 等. 不同土地利用方式下赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):101-107.
LI Guifang, YANG Renxiang, XIE Fuqian, et al. Slope Soil Erosion Characteristic of Lateritic Red Soil Under Different Land Use Types[J]. 2020, 34(2): 101-107.
李桂芳, 杨任翔, 谢福倩, 等. 不同土地利用方式下赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):101-107. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.015.
LI Guifang, YANG Renxiang, XIE Fuqian, et al. Slope Soil Erosion Characteristic of Lateritic Red Soil Under Different Land Use Types[J]. 2020, 34(2): 101-107. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.015.
为探究降雨和土地利用对南方赤红壤坡面侵蚀特征的影响,通过天然降雨观测试验,定量分析不同土地利用方式(坡耕地、果园、人工草地和撂荒地)下坡面径流和侵蚀泥沙特征,探讨降雨类型及土地利用对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响以及降雨特征参数与坡面水沙指标间的关系。结果表明:(1)2018年研究区降雨主要集中在5—9月,且每月降雨量主要由一场或几场暴雨及大暴雨组成;(2)坡耕地坡面年径流量和年侵蚀量均最大,分别是果园、人工草地以及撂荒地处理下的3.4,8.0,6.0倍和340.5,1 605.3,1 720.3倍;(2)次降雨下,坡面径流量在年内表现为前期平稳,后期波动增加,侵蚀量表现为前期波动较大,后期变化相对平稳,且侵蚀产沙主要集中在前期;(3)不同土地利用方式下,暴雨及大暴雨产生的径流量均占年径流量的75%以上,坡耕地、果园、人工草地以及撂荒地处理下由暴雨和大暴雨产生的侵蚀量分别占年侵蚀量的99.1%,71.8%,52.3%和51.6%;(4)降雨量和最大30 min降雨强度是影响赤红壤坡面侵蚀最重要的降雨特征参数,降雨历时和植被覆盖度均显著影响果园、人工草地及撂荒地坡面径流量。研究结果有助于明晰南方赤红壤区不同土地利用现状土壤侵蚀特征,为区域水土保持提供参考依据。
In order to explore the impact of rainfall and land use on the slope soil erosion characteristics of lateritic red soil in South China
the runoff and erosion sediment characteristics of different land use types (slope farmland
orchard
artificial pasture and abandoned land) were analyzed quantitatively through the observation experiment of natural rainfall
and the impact of rainfall types and land use on the erosion and sediment yield of slope
as well as the relationships of rainfall parameters and slope water and sediment were discussed. The results showed that the rainfall in 2018 was mainly from May to September
and the monthly rainfall was constituted by one or several rainstorms and heavy rainstorms. (2) The annual runoff and erosion of slope farmland were the largest
and the runoff amount of farmland was about 3.4
8.0 and 6.0 times of orchard
artificial pasture and abandoned land
respectively
and the sediment yield of slope farmland was about 340.5
1 605.3 and 1 720.3 times of orchard
artificial pasture and abandoned land
respectively. (3) Runoff amount on the slope surface kept a stable level during the early period of the year
then the fluctuation increased during the late period of the year
while the trend of sediment yield was opposite to that of runoff amount
and the erosion and sediment yield were mainly concentrated in the early period. (4) Runoff generated by heavy rainstorm and large heavy rainstorm accounted for more than 75% of the annual runoff for all land use types
while the erosion generated by heavy rainstorm and large heavy rainstorm accounted for 99.1%
71.8%
52.3% and 51.6% of the annual erosion for slope farmland
orchard
artificial pasture and abandoned land
respectively. (5) Rainfall amount and maximum rainfall intensity in 30 min were the most important parameters for soil erosion
and rainfall duration and vegetation coverage also significant affected runoff amount for orchard
artificial pasture and abandoned land. The results were helpful to clarify the soil erosion characteristic of lateritic red soil under different land use status and provide reference for regional water conservation of South China.
Seeger M, Errea M P, Beguerıa S, et al. Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees[J].Journal of Hydrology,2004,288(3):299-311.
郑江坤,杨帆,王文武,等.不同降雨等级下耕作措施对坡地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):38-45.
Wu X L, Wei Y J, Wang J G, et al. Effects of soil type and rainfall intensity on sheet erosion processes and sediment characteristics along the climatic gradient in central-south China[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,621:54-66.
张兴刚,王春红,程甜甜,等.山东省药乡小流域侵蚀性降雨分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(1):128-133.
Wang W T, Yin S Q, Xie Y, et al. Effects of four storm patterns on soil loss from five soils under natural rainfall[J].Catena,2016,141:56-65.
Dai C T, Liu Y J, Wang T W, et al. Exploring optimal measures to reduce soil erosion and nutrient losses in southern China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2018,210:41-48.
焦菊英,王志杰,魏艳红,等.延河流域极端暴雨下侵蚀产沙特征野外观测分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(13):159-167.
Wei O Y, Wu Y Y, Hao Z C, et al. Combined impacts of land use and soil property changes on soil erosion in a mollisol area under long-term agricultural development[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,613/614:798-809.
Vijith H, Hurmain A, Dodge-Wan D. Impacts of land use changes and land cover alteration on soil erosion rates and vulnerability of tropical mountain ranges in Borneo[J].Remote Sensing Applications:Society and Environment,2018,12:57-69.
张兴昌,邵明安,黄占斌,等.不同植被对土壤侵蚀和氮素流失的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(6):1038-1044.
涂安国,谢颂华,李英,等.长期野外监测红壤裸露坡地侵蚀性降雨分布及产沙分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(7):129-135.
彭宏佳,吴起鑫,任斐鹏,等.喀斯特地区坡面不同土地利用方式水土流失及磷素输出对次降雨特征的响应[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(4):756-765.
Patin J, Mouche E, Ribolzi O, et al. Effect of land use on interrill erosion in a montane catchment of Northern Laos:An analysis based on a pluri-annual runoff and soil loss database[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,563:480-494.
张凤荣.土壤地理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:142.
张池,高云华,陈旭飞,等.不同土地利用方式对赤红壤理化性质的综合影响[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(12):2140-2149.
殷水清,薛筱婵,岳天雨,等.中国降雨侵蚀力的时空分布及重现期研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):105-113.
沈利娜,王春林,何衍海,等.广西木棉麓小流域水土保持科技示范园规划[J].广西科学院学报,2010,26(2):202-205,212.
谢颂华,曾建玲,杨洁,等.南方红壤坡地不同耕作措施的水土保持效应[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(9):81-86.
王帅兵,宋娅丽,王克勤,等.不同雨型下反坡台阶减少红壤坡耕地氮磷流失的效果[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(13):160-169.
周怡雯,戴翠婷,刘窑军,等.耕作措施及雨强对南方红壤坡耕地侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):49-54.
Li C J, Pan C Z. The relative importance of different grass components in controlling runoff and erosion on a hillslope under simulated rainfall[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,558:90-103.
彭浩,李忠武,刘春,等.湘中低山丘陵区坡面产流输沙对降雨、土壤类型及水保措施的综合响应特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):60-67.
张锐波,张丽萍,钱婧,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对坡地侵蚀产沙影响强度研究[J].自然灾害学报,2017,26(5):206-212.
苏伟强,王小媚,任惠,等.广西杧果产业发展现状及对策探讨[J].热带农业工程,2018,42(5):38-40.
王玉梅,刘子凡,黄洁,等.株行距配置对木薯生物量和产量性状的影响[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(8):1369-1374.
Rodrigo-Comino J,Taguas E, Seeger M, et al. Quantification of soil and water losses in an extensive olive orchard catchment in Southern Spain[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,556:749-758.
Pan D L, Song Y Q, Dyck M, et al. Effect of plant cover type on soil water budget and tree photosynthesis in jujube orchards[J].Agricultural Water Management,2017,184:135-144.
王栋栋,王占礼,张庆玮,等.草地植被覆盖度坡度及雨强对坡面径流含沙量影响试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(15):119-125.
Wang Y F, You W, Fan J, et al. Effects of subsequent rainfall events with different intensities on runoff and erosion in a coarse soil[J].Catena,2018,170:100-107.
秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.
0
浏览量
1078
下载量
17
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621