不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素

姜泓旭; 田鹏; 穆兴民; 赵广举; 胡晋飞; 连秋晗; 张红

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素
- Variation and Driving Factor of Flow-sediment Relationship in Gushanchuan River Basin at Different Time Scales
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第2期页码：86-92
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "姜泓旭(1996-),女,吉林通化人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:Jiang690857604@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  科技基础资源调查专项（2017FY100904）国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（51509206）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.013
  中图分类号： P333;S157.2
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
姜泓旭, 田鹏, 穆兴民, 等. 不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):86-92.

JIANG Hongxu, TIAN Peng, MU Xingmin, et al. Variation and Driving Factor of Flow-sediment Relationship in Gushanchuan River Basin at Different Time Scales[J]. 2020, 34(2): 86-92.
姜泓旭, 田鹏, 穆兴民, 等. 不同时间尺度孤山川流域水沙关系变化及驱动因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):86-92. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.013.

JIANG Hongxu, TIAN Peng, MU Xingmin, et al. Variation and Driving Factor of Flow-sediment Relationship in Gushanchuan River Basin at Different Time Scales[J]. 2020, 34(2): 86-92. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.013.

摘要

以黄土高原孤山川流域为研究区，采用Mann-Kendall趋势检验和Pettitt突变检验分析年际尺度水沙变化趋势和突变年份。结果表明：孤山川径流量和输沙量于1965—2014年呈现极显著减少趋势（p<0.01），突变年份为1979年和1996年，据此将研究时段划分为基准期（1965—1979年）、过渡期（1980—1996年）和效益期（1997—2014年）。同基准期相比，过渡期年均径流深和输沙模数分别减少34.11 mm和401.48 t/km2，效益期减少65.05 mm和213.09 t/km2。径流深低于10 mm时，水沙关系较为离散；高于该值时，水沙关系变化相对稳定。过渡期人类活动的减水减沙贡献率分别为79.12%和86.45%，效益期人类活动减水减沙贡献率分别为86.45%和87.45%。

Abstract

The Gushanchuan Basin of the Loess Plateau was selected as the study area. The interannual variation of flow-sediment relationship and the mutation year were analyzed using the Mann-Kendall and the Pettitt test. The results of the runoff and sediment yield of Gushanchuan showed a significant decrease trend (p<0.01) from 1965 to 2014

and the mutation year was 1979 and 1996

according to which the study period was divided into the reference period (1965-1979)

the transition period (1980-1996)

and the benefit period (1997-2014). Compared with the reference period

the average annual runoff depth and sediment modulus decreased by 34.11 mm and 401.48 t/km2 in the transition period

respectively

and decreased by 65.05 mm and 213.09 t/km2 in the benefit period. When the runoff depth was less than 10 mm

the flow-sediment relationship was discrete. When the runoff depth was more than 10 mm

the flow-sediment relationship was relatively stable. The contribution rates of human activities for runoff and sediment reduction during the transition period were 79.12% and 86.45%

and the contribution increased to 86.45% and 87.45% in benefit period

respectively.

关键词

Keywords

references

Liu R, Xiao L L, Liu Z, et al. Quantifying the relative impacts of climate and human activities on vegetation changes at the regional scale[J].Nature Environment and Pollution Technology,2014,13(3):465-472

Zhao G J, Yue X L, Tian P, et al. Comparison of the suspended sediment dynamics in two loess plateau catchments, china[J].Land Degradation ang Development,2017,28(4):1398-1411.

赵阳,胡春宏,张晓明,等.近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):112-119.

Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S L, et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J].Nature Geoscience,2015,9(1):38-41.

Shi C X, Zhou Y Y, Fan X L, et al. A study on the annual runoff change and its relationship with water and soil conservation practices and climate change in the middle Yellow River basin[J].Catena,2013,100(2):31-41.

史红玲,胡春宏,王延贵,等.黄河流域水沙变化趋势分析及原因探讨[J].人民黄河,2014,36(4):1-5.

王芸,刘文兆,李怀有,等.黄土高塬沟壑区砚瓦川流域水沙关系及其对流域治理的响应[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1403-1413.

蔺鹏飞,张晓萍,刘二佳,等.黄土高原典型流域水沙关系对退耕还林(草)的响应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):1-6.

秦瑞杰,陆广勇,安乐平,等.水土保持措施对罗玉沟流域水沙变化的影响[J].中国水土保持,2019(1):19-22,69.

Zheng M G, Cao Q G, Cheng Q J. Modelling the runoff-sediment yield relationship using a proportional function in hilly areas of the loess plateau, north china[J].Geomorphology,2008,93(3/4):288-301.

Zheng M G, Yang J S, Qi D L, et al. Flow-sediment relationship as functions of spatial and temporal scales in hilly areas of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Catena,2012,98(17):29-40.

Tian P, Zhai J Q, Zhao G J, et al. Dynamics of runoff and suspended sediment transport in a highly erodible catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Land Degradation and Development,2016,27(3):839-850.

姚志宏,杨勤科,武艳丽,等.孤山川流域近30年土壤侵蚀时空动态特征分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2014,39(8):974-980.

金双彦,蒋昕晖,钱云平,等.孤山川流域次洪水量和沙量影响因素分析[J].人民黄河,2016,38(3):1-4.

王国庆,陈江南,李皓冰,等.黄土高原孤山川流域水沙变化研究综述[J].西北水资源与水工程,2003,14(3):13-16.

Miao C Y, Ni J R. Variation of natural streamflow since 1470 in the middle Yellow River, China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2009,6(11):2849-2864.

Yue X L, Mu X M, Zhao G J, et al. Dynamic changes of sediment load in the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin, China and implications for eco-restoration[J].Ecological Engineering,2014,73:64-72.

Majid K, Arash M. Changeability evaluation of hydro-climate variables in Western Caspian Sea region, Iran[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2018,77(4):120-131.

Wang J F, Gao Y C, Wang S. Assessing the response of runoff to climate change and human activities for a typical basin in the Northern Taihang Mountain, China[J].Journal of Earth System Science,2018,127(3):37.

Hu J F, Gao P, Mu X M, et al. Runoff-sediment dynamics under different flood patterns in a Loess Plateau catchment, China[J].Catena,2019,173:234-245.

穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.

慕星,张晓明.皇甫川流域水沙变化及驱动因素分析[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(5):933-939.

王志勇,李晓宇,钱星平.基于临界雨强方法的孤山川水土保持效益评估[J].人民黄河,2012,34(6):98-100.

赵爱军,高忠咏,冯天梅,等.孤山川流域水文特征变化及驱动因素[J].水资源与水工程学报,2014,25(1):182-186.

Wang Y, Liu W Z, Li Z, et al. Effect of comprehensive management on runoff and sediment reduction in Yanwachuan Watershed, Loess Tableland, China[J].Nature Environment and Pollution Technology,2014,13(3):465-472.

郑明国,蔡强国,王彩峰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面水保措施及植被对流域尺度水沙关系的影响[J].水利学报,2007, 38(1):47-53.

浏览量

1310

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

海南屯昌砂质壤土橡胶林水土保持措施生态产品能值分析

基于XGBoost-SHAP的三峡库区生态屏障区生态系统服务权衡及驱动力分析

中国近30 a耕地撂荒的时空动态及其驱动因素

三峡库区生态屏障区土壤侵蚀时空变化特征与驱动因素

人类活动加剧三峡库区湿地景观破碎化