1. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,成都,610041
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 四川农业大学林学院,成都,611130
4. 成都市水务技术服务中心,成都,610031
5. 成都理工大学环境与土木工程学院,成都,610059
6. 四川农业大学水利水电学院,四川,雅安,625014
[ "周涛(1996-),男,河南卢氏人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与生态修复研究。E-mail:1712815401@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
周涛, 苏正安, 何周窈, 等. 西南干暖河谷土壤细沟可蚀性垂直地带性差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):56-63.
ZHOU Tao, SU Zheng'an, HE Zhouyao, et al. Variation in the Vertical Zonality of Rill Erodibility in Southwest Dry-warm Valley of China[J]. 2020, 34(2): 56-63.
周涛, 苏正安, 何周窈, 等. 西南干暖河谷土壤细沟可蚀性垂直地带性差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(2):56-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.009.
ZHOU Tao, SU Zheng'an, HE Zhouyao, et al. Variation in the Vertical Zonality of Rill Erodibility in Southwest Dry-warm Valley of China[J]. 2020, 34(2): 56-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.009.
为探究以干暖河谷为基带的西南山地土壤细沟可蚀性垂直地带性差异,选择该区不同垂直带典型土地利用类型(林草地和耕地)下不同土壤类型(红壤、黄壤、棕壤和暗棕壤)为研究对象,利用室内"V"形细沟模拟装置,分别进行6种流量(150,300,450,600,750,900 mL/min)和3种水文状态(排水状态、饱和状态和渗流状态)的模拟冲刷试验。结果表明:(1)该区土壤颗粒组成无明显的垂直地带性,林草地的砂粒含量偏高,各土壤的颗粒含量差异在9%以内,所有土壤均为粉质壤土,但有机质差异较大,且随着海拔增加而增加;(2)土壤的细沟可蚀性具有明显的垂直地带性,随海拔升高,林草地土壤可蚀性Kr值逐渐减小,相比于红壤,暗棕壤的Kr值减小幅度平均为47.74%,耕地土壤中黄壤略大于红壤,可能与人为活动强度和土壤熟化程度有关;(3)不同土地利用方式下,林草地土壤Kr值显著大于耕地土壤Kr值,平均增幅为22.63%,这可能与有机质促进土壤抗侵蚀性能的提高有关;(4)不同近地表水文状态下,土壤的细沟可蚀性表现为渗流状态 > 饱和状态 > 排水状态,表明随着近地表水文状态变化,尤其是垂直水力梯度的增加会显著导致土壤的细沟可蚀性增大;试验还发现,土壤的临界剪切力仅在不同的水文状态下具有渗流状态 > 饱和状态 > 排水状态的规律性,而在不同海拔和土地利用类型之间没有明显的规律性。
Typical soils (i.e.
red soil
yellow soil
brown soil and dark brown soil) under different elevations and typical land use types (cultivated land and forestland) were selected to investigate the variations in the vertical zonality of soil erodibility in dry-warm valley of China. AV-shape simulation flume was used to estimate rill erodibility in the erosion process. A series of rill erosion-based scour experiments were conducted
using water discharge of 150
300
450
600
750
900 mL/min and hydrological conditions of drainage
saturation and seepage conditions. Results showed that the composition of soil particle composition had no obvious vertical zonality. The content of sand in forestland soil was relatively high
and the difference of particle composition in each soil was within 9%. All soils were silt loam. However
an obvious difference in soil organic matter appeared among different vertical zones. A vertical zonality of the rill erodibility (Kr value) could be find. As the elevation increased
Kr value of forestland soil decreased
and Kr value of dark brown soil was 47.74% less than that of red soil for forestland. For cultivated land
Kr value of yellow soil was slightly larger than that of the red soil
which could be ascribe to different human activities and soil maturity. Soil Kr of forestland was significantly higher than that of cultivated land with an average increase of 22.63%
which might be relate to the improved anti-erosion ability by soil organic matter. Soil erodibility was highest under seepage condition among different hydrological conditions
and soil erodibilitywas higher under saturation condition than that under drainage treatment. This result indicated that the difference of hydraulic gradients would also affect soil erodibility. Meanwhile
the critical shear stress was also highest under seepage condition among different hydrological conditions
and the critical shear stress was higher under saturation condition than that under drainage treatment. No obvious variation trend appeared among different vertical zonalities and land use types.
Xu X L, Ma K M, Fu B J, et al. Relationships between vegetation and soil and topography in a dry warm river valley, SW China[J].Catena,2008,75(2):138-145.
胡实,赵茹欣,贾仰文,等.中国典型山地植被垂直地带性特征及其影响要素[J].自然杂志,2018,40(1):12-16.
王献溥,于顺利,汤大友.中国温带荒漠山地垂直地带性的遗产价值[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(5):694-701.
Bojko O, Kabala C. Transformation of physicochemical soil properties along a mountain slope due to land management and climate changes:A case study from the Karkonosze Mountains, SW Poland[J].Catena,2016,140:43-54.
Middleton H E. Properties of soils which influence soil erosion[J].Technical Bulletins,1930(178).
黄义端,田积莹,雍绍萍.土壤内在性质对侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持学报,1989(3):9-14.
曾全超,董扬红,李鑫,等.基于Le Bissonnais法对黄土高原森林植被带土壤团聚体及土壤可蚀性特征研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(9):1093-1101.
Su Z A, Xiong D H, Zhang J H, et al. Variation in the vertical zonality of erodibility and critical shear stress of rill erosion in China's Hengduan Mountains[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2019,44(1):88-97.
王晨沣,马超,王玉杰,等.水力梯度影响下WEPP模型估计细沟侵蚀参数的可行性分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(8):126-133.
Liu J E, Zhang X, Zhou Z. Quantifying effects of root systems of planted and natural vegetation on rill detachment and erodibility of a loessialsoil[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,195:104420.
郁耀闯,王长燕.黄土高原丘陵区冰草和柳枝稷土壤细沟可蚀性季节动态[J].草业科学,2017,34(5):950-957.
孙龙,张光辉,王兵,等.黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):199-205.
姜恩三,任光明,陈锦涛.四川省普格县地质灾害发育的分形特征[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2016,27(3):122-126.
吴海蓉.四川省普格县水土流失综合治理对策探讨[J].水利水电快报,2009,30(8):23-25.
Patheniades E. Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils[J].Journal of the Hydraulics Division,1965,9(1):105-139.
王晶,何忠俊,王立东,等.高黎贡山土壤腐殖质特性与团聚体数量特征研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(4):723-733.
乔锋,王明刚,李晶,等.色季拉山垂直气候带土壤可蚀性研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(6):121-126.
李子君,王硕,林锦阔,等.沂河流域土壤可蚀性空间变异研究[J].土壤通报,2019,50(1):45-51.
黄晓强,赵云杰,信忠保,等.北京山区典型土地利用方式对土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):5-10.
杨超,苏正安,马菁,等.不同近地表水文条件下矿山弃土对土壤细沟可蚀性的影响:以攀枝花盐边县龙蟒矿山为例[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):67-72.
Graber E R, Fine P, Levy G J. Soil stabilization in semiarid and aridlandagriculture[J].Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2006,18(2):190-205.
夏振尧,张伦,牛鹏辉,等.干密度初始含水率坡度对紫色土崩解特性的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(1):121-127.
张晓媛,范昊明,杨晓珍,等.容重与含水率对砂质黏壤土静水崩解速率影响研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(1):214-218.
0
浏览量
1119
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621