1. 南昌工程学院, 江西省退化生态系统修复与流域生态水文重点实验室,南昌,330099
2. 安徽师范大学生命科学学院, 重要生物资源保护与利用研究安徽省省级重点实验室,安徽,芜湖,241000
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
周际海, 郜茹茹, 魏倩, 等. 旱地红壤不同土地利用方式对土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):327-332.
ZHOU Jihai, GAO Ruru, WEI Qian, et al. Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Enzyme Activities and Microbial Diversity in Upland Red Soil[J]. 2020, 34(1): 327-332.
周际海, 郜茹茹, 魏倩, 等. 旱地红壤不同土地利用方式对土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):327-332. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.047.
ZHOU Jihai, GAO Ruru, WEI Qian, et al. Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Enzyme Activities and Microbial Diversity in Upland Red Soil[J]. 2020, 34(1): 327-332. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.047.
土壤是人类存在与发展的必需物质基础,土地利用的变化直接影响土壤质量。以江西红壤为例,通过野外采样和室内实验分析,研究了旱地红壤的5种土地利用方式:荒地(HD)、茶树园(CSY)、柑橘园(GJY)、花生地(HSD)、玉米地(YMD)的表层土壤(0-15 cm)土壤酶活性及微生物多样性。结果表明:与荒地相比,茶树园、柑橘园、花生地和玉米地的土壤基础呼吸强度分别提高了93.33%,79.71%,9.12%,6.45%;茶树园的土壤微生物量碳含量比荒地的增大了113.67%,而柑橘园、花生地和玉米地比荒地的分别减小了12.35%,6.84%,87.57%;茶树园、柑橘园和花生地的土壤FDA水解酶活性分别比荒地的增大了51.99%,44.04%,25.55%,而玉米地的比荒地的减小了13.62%;茶树园和花生地的土壤脱氢酶活性分别比荒地的增大了2.47%和123.63%,柑橘园的比荒地的增大了35.70%;5种土地利用类型对土壤过氧化氢酶和蔗糖酶活性影响较小。茶树园、柑橘园和花生地的土壤微生物总磷脂脂肪酸量分别比荒地的增大了11.11%,5.56%,2.78%,而玉米地的比荒地的减小了13.89%;茶树园、柑橘园和玉米地的土壤细菌种类分别比荒地的减少约9.09%,4.55%,22.73%;不同土地利用方式的土壤真菌种类数相同,无差异;茶树园和花生地的土壤放线菌种类均比荒地的增大约16.67%,而柑橘园的比荒地的减少约16.67%。说明相比于荒地、柑橘园、花生地和玉米地,茶树园的土壤微生物多样性更加丰富,群落结构也相对稳定,种植茶树更有利于提高土壤质量及对土壤肥力的保持。
Soil is the necessary material basis for human survival and development
and changes in land use patterns directly affect soil properties. Taking Jiangxi red soil as an example
soils from five kinds of land use patterns:wasteland (HD)
tea garden (CSY)
citrus orchard (GJY)
peanut land (HSD)
and corn field (YMD) in upland red soil were used through field sampling and laboratory analysis to assess enzymatic activity and soil microbial diversity in surface soil (0-15 cm). The results showed that compared with the wasteland
the soil basal respiration of tea garden
citrus orchard
peanut land
and corn field increased by 93.33%
79.71%
9.12%
and 6.45%. The soil microbial biomass carbon of tea garden increased by 113.67% compared with the wasteland
while that of citrus orchard
peanut land
and corn field decreased by 12.35%
6.84% and 87.57%. Compared with the wasteland
the activities of FDA hydrolysis in tea plantation
citrus orchard and peanut field increased by 51.99%
44.04% and 25.55%
while the FDA hydrolysis activity in corn field decreased by 13.62%. The dehydrogenase activity in the tea garden and peanut field increased by 2.47% and 123.63% compared with the wasteland
the activity of urease in the citrus orchard increased by 35.70% compared with the wasteland
the catalase activity and sucrase activity were less affected by the five land use patterns. Compared with the wasteland
the total biomass of soil microorganisms in tea garden
citrus orchard
and peanut field increased by 11.11%
5.56% and 2.78%
while the total biomass of soil microorganisms in corn field decreased by 13.89%. The soil bacterial species in tea plantation
citrus orchard and peanut field decreased by 9.09%
4.55% and 22.73% compared with the wasteland
there was no difference in the number of soil fungi in different land use patterns. Compared with the wasteland
the species of soil actinomycetes in tea plantation and peanut field both increased by 16.67%
while the species of soil actinomycetes in citrus orchard decreased by 16.67%. The above results showed that compared with wasteland
citrus orchard
peanut land and corn field
the soil microbial diversity of tea garden is more abundant
and the community structure is relatively stable. Planting tea trees is more conducive to improving soil quality and maintaining soil fertility.
史志华,杨洁,李忠武,等.南方红壤低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):6-9.
赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7615-7622.
陶朋闯,陈效民,靳泽文,等.生物质炭与氮肥配施对旱地红壤微生物量碳、氮和碳氮比的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):231-235.
张德喜,吴卿.不同耕作方式对农田土壤养分含量及土壤酶活性的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2018,46(11):234-237.
马琳.浅析土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响[J].种子科技,2018,36(9):8-18.
Uren N C. Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into the rhizosphere by soil-grown plants[M]. Boca Ra-ton:CRC Press,2007.
程坤,周际海,金志农,等.土壤微生物活性对石油原油、铅镉及其复合污染的响应[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(5):1976-1982.
韩桂琪,王彬,徐卫红,等.重金属Cd、Zn、Cu、Pb复合污染对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):238-242.
Zhang Y Y, Zheng N G, Wang J, et al. High turnover rate of free phospholipids in soil confirms the classic hypothesis of PLFA methodology[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,135:323-330.
杨建昌.水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(1):36-46.
周际海,陈晏敏,吴雪艳,等.黑麦草与施肥对石油-铅-镉复合污染土壤微生物活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):334-339.
Ashworth A J, De Bruyn J M, Allen F L, et al. Microbial community structure is affected by cropping sequences and poultry litter under long-term no-tillage[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,114:210-219.
肖美佳,张晴雯,董月群,等.免耕对土壤微生物量碳影响的Meta分析[J].核农学报,2019,33(4):833-839.
刘捷豹,陈光水,郭剑芬,等.森林土壤酶对环境变化的响应研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):110-117.
周震峰,王建超,饶潇潇.添加生物炭对土壤酶活性的影响[J].江西农业学报,2015,27(6):110-112.
张晨,张丽红,李亚宁,等.典型磺胺类抗生素对土壤脱氢酶和过氧化氢酶活性的影响[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(6):2379-2382.
陈海燕,樊霆,张泽,等.不同植物修复重金属复合污染土壤对土壤中微生物数量与酶活性的影响[J].环境保护, 2018,46(1):65-69.
陈书涛,桑琳,张旭,等.增温及秸秆施用对冬小麦田土壤呼吸和酶活性的影响[J].环境科学,2016,37(2):703-709.
王燕云,赵龙杰,郝春丽,等.土壤有机肥对不同连作年限设施黄瓜土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2019,31(4):631-638.
李斌,辜翔,方晰,等.湘中丘陵区土壤微生物指标对土地利用方式的响应[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(4):72-77,78.
贾倩民,陈彦云,刘秉儒,等.干旱区盐碱地不同栽培草地土壤理化性质及微生物数量[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(7):1218-1225.
王海斌,陈晓婷,丁力,等.土壤酸度对茶树根际土壤微生物群落多样性影响[J].热带作物学报,2018,39(3):448-454.
张楠楠,马琨,杨佳丽,等.土地利用方式变化对土壤微生物群落的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(9):111-118.
0
浏览量
1045
下载量
20
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621