1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院,兰州,730070
2. 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 甘肃省草业工程实验室, 中-美草地畜牧业可持续研究中心,兰州,730070
3. 甘肃农业大学人文学院,兰州,730070
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
张成君, 康文娟, 张翠梅, 等. 基于主成分-聚类分析评价不同轮作模式对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):292-300.
ZHANG Chengjun, KANG Wenjuan, ZHANG Cuimei, et al. Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rotation Patterns on Soil Fertility Based on Principal Component-Cluster Analysis[J]. 2020, 34(1): 292-300.
张成君, 康文娟, 张翠梅, 等. 基于主成分-聚类分析评价不同轮作模式对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):292-300. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.042.
ZHANG Chengjun, KANG Wenjuan, ZHANG Cuimei, et al. Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rotation Patterns on Soil Fertility Based on Principal Component-Cluster Analysis[J]. 2020, 34(1): 292-300. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.042.
为探明我国西北半干旱区"粮经饲"不同轮作模式的土壤肥力效应,于2017年在宁夏自治区固原市原州区设置玉米-豌豆(C-Pe)、玉米-玉米(C-C)、2龄苜蓿(2A)、高粱-马铃薯(B-Po)、燕麦-玉米(O-C)、马铃薯-燕麦(Po-O)、豌豆-高粱(Pe-B)7种轮作处理模式,研究了不同粮草轮作模式土壤养分、酶活性及可培养微生物群落特征,并进行土壤肥力综合评价。结果表明:(1)不同轮作处理模式对土壤养分影响显著,与其他轮作模式相比,2A模式更有利于土壤养分的累积,而C-C模式增加了对养分的消耗,C-Pe和Po-O模式的有机质、全氮、速效氮、速效磷和速效钾含量高于B-Po和O-C模式,轮作处理对全钾含量影响较小。(2)不同轮作处理模式对土壤酶活性影响显著,2A模式较其他轮作模式显著增加了土壤脲酶和蔗糖酶活性(P<0.05),C-C模式土壤酶活性最低。O-C和Pe-B模式的蔗糖酶、脲酶和碱性磷酸酶活性高于B-Po模式。(3)不同轮作处理模式对土壤可培养微生物数量影响显著,且各轮作模式下土壤微生物数量以细菌占绝对优势,放线菌次之,真菌数量最少,并有明显的土层垂直分布规律,与其他轮作模式相比,2A、C-C和B-Po模式的细菌数量和微生物总数量显著下降(P<0.05),真菌数量显著增加(P<0.05),O-C模式的细菌数量和微生物总数量明显增加,真菌数量降低。(4)运用主成分分析-数值聚类方法对不同轮作模式下土壤养分、土壤酶活性、土壤微生物数量的15个指标进行土壤肥力综合评价,主成分分析提取的2个主成分累计贡献率达89.38%,第1主成分以土壤有机质、全氮、速效氮、全磷、速效磷、速效钾、蔗糖酶、脲酶和碱性磷酸酶贡献最大,达63.56%,第2主成分以细菌数量、真菌数量和微生物总数贡献最大,达25.82%,且各轮作模式在2个主成分上的综合得分排名为2A > Pe-B > C-Pe > O-C > Po-O > B-Po > C-C。再以2个主成分得分进行聚类,将7个模式共分为3类,第1类(2A)土壤综合肥力最好;第2类(Pe-B、O-C、C-Pe、Po-O、B-Po)土壤综合肥力较好;第3类(C-C)土壤综合肥力较差。研究结果为当地耕作方式改良提供理论依据和实践指导。
In order to understand the effect of soil fertility under different rotation patterns of "grain
cash
and forage crops" in the semi-arid area of northwest China
seven rotation patterns
including corn-pea (C-Pe)
corn-corn (C-C)
2-year alfalfa (2A)
broomcorn-potato (B-Po)
oat-corn (O-C)
potato-oat (Po-O)
pea-broomcorn (Pe-B)
were set up in Yuanzhou District
Guyuan City
Ningxia Autonomous Region in 2017. The Indicators including the soil nutrient
enzyme activity and characteristics of culturable microbial community under different grain rotation cropping patterns were measured. Meanwhile
the soil fertility was comprehensively evaluated
which provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for local farming improvement. The results showed:(1) Different rotation patterns had significant effects on soil chemical properties. Compared with other rotation models
2A was more conducive to the accumulation of soil nutrients. However
C-C mode increased the consumption of nutrients. The organic matter
total nitrogen
available nitrogen
available phosphorus
and available potassium content of C-Pe and Pe-B modes were significant higher than those of B-Po and O-C modes
moreover
rotation treatment had less effect on total potassium content. (2) Different crop rotation patterns had significant effects on soil enzyme activities. The soil urease and sucrase activities of 2A mode were significantly higher than those of other rotation patterns (P<0.05). The soil enzyme activity in C-C mode was the lowest
and the sucrase
the urease
and the alkaline phosphatase activities of O-C and Pe-B modes were significant higher than those of B-Po mode. (3) Different crop rotation patterns had significant effects on the number of soil culturable microorganisms. In crop rotation patterns
the number of soil microorganisms was dominated by bacteria
followed by actinomycetes and fungi with obvious vertical distribution of soil layers. Compared with other rotation models
the number of bacteria and the total number of microorganisms in 2A
C-C
and B-Po models decreased significantly and the number of fungi increased significantly (P<0.05)
which was opposite to O-C mode. 4) Principal component analysis-numerical clustering method was used to comprehensively evaluate the soil fertility of 15 indicators of soil nutrient
soil enzyme activity
and soil microbial population under different rotation patterns. The results showed that the cumulative contribution rate of the two principal components extracted by principal component analysis was up to 89.38%. The first main component was composed of soil organic matter
total nitrogen
available nitrogen
total phosphorus
available phosphorus
available potassium
pH
sucrase
urease
and alkaline phosphatase
and the cumulative contribution rate was up to 63.56%. The second main component was composed of bacteria
fungi and microorganisms and cumulative contribution rate reached 25.82%. The overall score of each rotation pattern on the two principal components was ranked as 2A > Pe-B > C-Pe > O-C > Po-O > B-Po > C-C. The two principal component scores were further clustered
and seven models were divided into three categories:the first type (2A) had the best soil fertility; the second type (including Pe-B
O-C
C-Pe
Po-O
and B-Po modes) had better soil fertility; and the third type (C-C) had poor soil fertility. These research results may provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for the improvement of local farming methods.
张婧,张仁陟,左小安.保护性耕作对黄土高原农田土壤理化性质的影响[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(1):137-143.
蔡艳,郝明德.轮作模式与周期对黄土高原旱地小麦产量、养分吸收和土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):864-872.
Alvey S, Yang C H, Andreas B, et al. Cereal legume rotation effects on rhizosphere bacterial community structure in West African soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2003,37(2):73-82.
Ennin S A, Clegg M D. Effect of soybean plant Populations in a soybean and maize rotation[J]. Agronocy Journal,2001,93(2):396-403.
柴继宽.轮作和连作对燕麦产量、品质、主要病虫害及土壤肥力的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2012.
董艳,鲁耀,董坤,等.轮作模式对设施土壤微生物区系和酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2010,41(1):53-55.
邱立友,戚元成,王明道.植物次生代谢物的自毒作用及其与连作障碍的关系[J].土壤,2010,42(1):1-7.
刘创民,李昌哲,史敏华,等.多元统计分析在森林土壤肥力类型分辨中的应用[J].生态学报,1994,16(4):444-447.
Sadeghi M, Morris G A, Carranza E J M, et al. Rare earth element distribution and mineralization in Sweden:An application of principal component analysis to FOREGS soil geochemistry[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2013,133(5):160-175.
温延臣,李燕青,袁亮,等.长期不同施肥制度土壤肥力特征综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):91-99.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,1999:42-50.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
李阜棣.土壤微生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996.
朱建平,殷瑞飞.SPSS在统计分析中的应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:103-125.
方开泰.实用多元统计分析[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989:215-223.
郝鲜俊,韩阳,张又丹,等.基于主成分-聚类分析评价接种丛枝菌根真菌对采煤塌陷区土壤质量的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(4):789-796.
蔡艳,郝明德,臧逸飞,等.不同轮作制下长期施肥旱地土壤微生物多样性特征[J].核农学报,2014,29(2):344-350.
王大勇,刘涛,郭慕萍,等.豆科植物对不同深度土壤水分及养分含量的影响[J].土壤通报,2013,44(3):551-555.
李兆丽.红豆草与紫花苜蓿的培肥效果研究[J].草业科学,2008,25(7):65-68.
王俊,李凤民,贾宇,等.半干旱黄土区苜蓿草地轮作农田土壤氮、磷和有机质变化[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):439-444.
马琳,刘文利.保护地连作对土壤养分状况的影响[J].吉林农业科学,2007,32(1):33-34,39.
Zuber S, Behnke G, Nafziger E, et al. Carbon and nitrogen content of soil organic matter and microbial biomass under long-term crop rotation and tillage in illinois[J]. USA, Agriculture,2018,8(37):1-12.
刘沛松.宁南苜蓿草田轮作土壤环境效应研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
曾玲玲,张兴梅,洪音,等.长期施肥与耕作方式对土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2008(2):27-30.
臧逸飞.长期不同轮作施肥土壤微生物学特性研究及生物肥力评价[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.
王理德,王方琳,郭春秀,等.土壤酶学硏究进展[J].土壤,2016,48(1):12-21.
沈宗专,孙莉,王东升,等.石灰碳铵熏蒸与施用生物有机肥对连作黄瓜和西瓜枯萎病及生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(10):3351-3359.
肖元松,彭福田,张亚飞,等.增氧栽培对桃幼树根系构型及氮素代谢的影响[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(10):1995-2002.
庄岩,吴凤芝,杨阳,等.轮套作对黄瓜土壤微生物多样性及产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(1):204-209.
吴宏亮,康建宏,陈阜,等.不同轮作模式对砂田土壤微生物区系及理化性状的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):674-680.
王震宇, 王英祥, 陈祖仁. 重茬大豆生长发育障碍机制初探[J]. 大豆科学,1991,37(1):31-36
李海云,姚拓,张建贵,等.不同扰动高寒草地土壤微生物数量时空变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):177-183.
尹国丽,蔡卓山,陶茸,等.不同草田轮作方式对土壤肥力、微生物数量及自毒物质含量的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(3):42-50.
0
浏览量
1155
下载量
17
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621