1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院,贵阳,550001
2. 贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵阳,550001
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王玲玉, 周忠发, 赵馨, 等. 基于地块级时序遥感的喀斯特石漠化地区撂荒地时空演变[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):92-99.
WANG Lingyu, ZHOU Zhongfa, ZHAO Xin, et al. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Karst Rocky Desertification Abandoned Cropland Based on Farmland-parcels Time-series Remote Sensing[J]. 2020, 34(1): 92-99.
王玲玉, 周忠发, 赵馨, 等. 基于地块级时序遥感的喀斯特石漠化地区撂荒地时空演变[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):92-99. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.014.
WANG Lingyu, ZHOU Zhongfa, ZHAO Xin, et al. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Karst Rocky Desertification Abandoned Cropland Based on Farmland-parcels Time-series Remote Sensing[J]. 2020, 34(1): 92-99. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.014.
撂荒地在全球呈扩散趋势,传统的调查方法已无法满足及时、精确掌握撂荒情况的需求。针对喀斯特石漠化耕地的撂荒因光学影像的不足和严重的混合像元不易精确识别和提取,以贵州省息烽县为例,运用高精度影像精确识别提取耕地地块,再叠加通过MVC方法计算Landsat数据得到的2003—2018年时序NDVI数据,得到撂荒和复垦时空分布。结果表明:(1)地块和时序NDVI组合能够精准地识别提取撂荒地,该方法对于光学数据缺乏的和耕地破碎的多云雨山区有很好的适用效果;(2)2003—2018年息烽县撂荒地呈随机散点状分布,主要分布在有岩石裸露潜在、轻度、中度石漠化地区,2008年撂荒面积最大2 545.6 hm2,撂荒率最高7.7%;有7块耕地持续撂荒时间最长12年,有8块地累计撂荒最多15年。(3)2003—2018年息烽县复垦率与撂荒率波动趋势基本-致,复垦率的响应延后1年,较高的石漠化等级负面影响复垦行为。研究结果为喀斯特多云雨山区撂荒地的精准识别提取提供高效、可行的思路和方法,为撂荒地的驱动因子分析、趋势监测和风险评价、效应评估及政策设计提供精确的基础数据。
The abandoned cropland is spreading widely all over the world. Traditional survey methods can not meet the need of timely and accurate grasp of abandoned cropland. In view of the insufficiency of optical remote sensing images
and that it is difficult to accurately identify and extract the abandoned cropland in karst rocky desertification land from the serious mixed pixels
taking Xifeng County of Guizhou Province as an example
the high-resolution image and rocky desertification grade data were used to identify and extract different rocky desertification grade cultivated land plots. The time series NDVI data of 2003-2018 obtained by calculating the Landsat data by MVC method was superimposed
and the spatial and temporal distribution of the abandoned cropland and reclamation in Xifeng County in 2003-2018 was extracted. The results showed:(1) The combination of cultivated land plot and time series NDVI could accurately identify and extract abandoned cropland. This method had a good application in the area lacking of optical data and the cloudy rainy mountain area where the cultivated land is broken. (2) In 2003-2018
the abandoned cropland in Xifeng County was randomly scattered and mainly distributed in the potential
mild and moderate rocky desertification area in the north and east. In 2008
the largest abandoned area was 2 545.6 hm2 and the highest rate of abandonment was 7.7%. In the period of 2003-2018
there were 7 plots of abandoned land that lasted for a maximum of 12 years
and 8 plots accumulated for up to 15 years. (3) In 2003-2018
the reclamation rate of Xifeng County was basically consistent with the fluctuation trend of the abandonment rate
but the response to the reclamation rate was delayed by one year. There was a certain difference between the non-karst cultivated land reclamation behavior and the rocky desertification cultivated land reclamation behavior. The higher rock desertification grade negatively affected the reclamation behavior. The research results could provide an efficient and feasible idea and method for the accurate identification and extraction of abandoned cropland in karst cloudy and rainy mountainous areas
also provide the accurate and basic data for driving factor analysis
trend monitoring and risk assessment
effect assessment and policy design in abandoned cropland.
Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F. Global forest transition prospects for an end to deforestation[J]. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2011,36:343-371.
Queiroz C, Beilin R, Folke C, et al. Farmland abandonment:Threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review[J]. Frontiers in Ecology &the Environment,2014,12(5):288-296.
陈欣怡,郑国全.国内外耕地撂荒研究进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(增刊2):37-41.
李秀彬,赵宇鸾.森林转型、农地边际化与生态恢复[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(10):91-95.
Pointereau P, Coulon F, Girard P, et al. Analysis of farmland abandonment and the extent and location of agricultural areas that are actually abandoned or are in risk to be abandoned[R]. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (EUR 23411 EN), 2008.
李升发, 李秀彬.耕地撂荒研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2016,71(3):370-389.
葛霖,高明,胡正峰,等.基于农户视角的山区耕地撂荒原因分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2012,33(4):42-46.
李阳兵,罗光杰,黄娟.茂兰喀斯特自然保护区撂荒地时空演变、机制及其植被恢复[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(4):447-453.
Noryusdiana M Y,Siti K B. Towards the use of remote-sensing data for monitoring of abandoned oil palm lands in Malaysia: A semi-automatic approach[J]. Internationaljournal of Remote Sensing,2017,38(2):432-449.
史铁丑,徐晓红.重庆市典型县撂荒耕地图斑的提取与验证[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(24):261-267.
张丽娟.20世纪80年代以来全球耕地变化的基本特征及空间格局[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1235-1247.
Matthias B. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine[J]. Land Use Policy,2011,28(3):552-562.
肖国峰,朱秀芳,侯陈瑶,等.撂荒耕地的提取与分析:以山东省庆云县和无棣县为例[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1658-1673.
Estel S, Kuemmerle T, Alcántara C, et al. Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2015,163:312-325.
程维芳.南方撂荒地遥感调查方法研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2011.
息烽县统计局.息烽县2017年领导工作手册统计年鉴[M/OL]. (2017-09-10)[2019-09-15]. http://www.xifeng.gov.cn/zwgk/xxgkml/jcxxgk/tjsj/tjgb/201811/t20181120_1903269.html
贵州省发展和改革委员会,贵州省科技厅,贵州师范大学.贵州省喀斯特石漠化综合防治图集(2006-2050)[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2007.
周忠发,闫利会,陈全,等.人为干预下喀斯特石漠化演变机制与调控[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
史铁丑,李秀彬.基于地块尺度的重庆山区耕地撂荒风险研究[J].山地学报,2017,35(4):543-555.
李瑞玲,王世杰,熊康宁,等.贵州省岩溶地区坡度与土地石漠化空间相关分析[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(4):82-86.
查燕,宋茜,卫炜,等.基于NDVI时序数据的华北地区耕地物候参数时空变化特征[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(11):1-9.
朱长明,骆剑承,沈占锋,等.基于地块特征基元与多时相遥感数据的冬小麦播种面积快速提取[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(9):94-99.
黄秋昊,蔡运龙,王秀春.我国西南部喀斯特地区石漠化研究进展[J].自然灾害学报,2007,16(2):106-111.
0
浏览量
1271
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621