侵蚀性风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育特性

邓龙洲; 张丽萍; 陈儒章; 邬燕虹; 范晓娟; 孙天宇; 费凯

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

侵蚀性风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育特性

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 侵蚀性风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育特性
- Characteristics of Soil Development on the Erosive Weathered Granite Slopes
- 水土保持学报 2020年34卷第1期页码：64-70
- 作者机构：
  
  浙江大学环境与资源学院, 浙江省农业资源与环境重点实验室,杭州,310058
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41877065，41471221）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.010
  中图分类号： S151
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
邓龙洲, 张丽萍, 陈儒章, 等. 侵蚀性风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育特性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):64-70.

DENG Longzhou, ZHANG Liping, CHEN Ruzhang, et al. Characteristics of Soil Development on the Erosive Weathered Granite Slopes[J]. 2020, 34(1): 64-70.
邓龙洲, 张丽萍, 陈儒章, 等. 侵蚀性风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育特性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(1):64-70. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.010.

DENG Longzhou, ZHANG Liping, CHEN Ruzhang, et al. Characteristics of Soil Development on the Erosive Weathered Granite Slopes[J]. 2020, 34(1): 64-70. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.01.010.

摘要

采用CT扫描技术、X射线荧光光谱仪化学全量分析和实验室土壤理化特性测试方法，对浙江省典型风化花岗岩坡地土壤发育的主要物理指标、化学风化系数及风化强度进行了测量计算，分析了侵蚀环境下不同地貌部位的土壤发育特征。结果表明：坡地土壤的发育程度较弱，土壤分层不明显，不同地貌部位的土壤风化发育程度排序为坡底 < 坡中 < 坡顶，与坡面侵蚀强度的排序正好相反。土壤物理风化指标随土层深度增加的变化规律较强，脱硅富铝化过程随着剖面深度的增加越来越弱，物理风化指标和化学风化指标具有同等作用的表征效果，不同于当地地带性土壤发育中以化学风化为主的特性。水力侵蚀强烈地区的最大风化强度位于20—40 cm处，推得水力侵蚀对土壤发育的影响深度为0—40 cm。

Abstract

To reveal the soil developmental characteristics on the erosive weathered granite slopes

soil samples of a typical weathering granite slope in Zhejiang Province were studied by the methods of CT scanning technique

X-ray fluorescence spectrometer and laboratory soil physicochemical properties test based on the principles of soil genesis and water erosion. The results showed that the total developmental degree of the soil samples was weak because the varying difference between the up and bottom layers was very small and the soil level-development was not obvious. The weathering intensity displayed an order of bottom profile < middle profile < top profile

which was just opposite to that in terms of the erosion intensity. The physical weathering indexes increased significantly with soil depth while the desilication process weakened. The varying range of chemical weathering intensity was not significant in the all soil profiles and it was different from the local zonal soil development which gave priority to chemical weathering features. Physical and chemical weathering indexes had the equal effect on describing the soil developmental characteristics. Water erosion affected the soil weathering processes and hindered the soil development to typical zonal soil. The maximum weathering intensity was between the surface layer of 20-40 cm

which indicated that the soil layer of 0-40 cm was greatly affected by water erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

Hartemink A E, Bockheim J G. Soil genesis and classification[J].Catena,2013,104:251-256.

方谦,洪汉烈,赵璐璐,等.风化成土过程中自生矿物的气候指示意义[J].地球科学,2018,43(3):753-769.

Norra S, Fjer N, Li F W, et al. The influence of different land uses on mineralogical and chemical composition and horizonation of urban soil profiles in Qingdao,China[J].Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2008,8(1):4-16.

Chen M J, Liu C S, Li F B, et al. Correlations between soil geochemical properties and Fe(III) reduction suggest microbial reducibility of iron in different soils from Southern China[J].Catena,2014,123:176-187.

Banfield J F, Barker W W, Welch S A, et al. Biological impact on mineral dissolution:Application of the lichen model to understanding mineral weathering in the rhizosphere[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1999,96(7):3404-3411.

Hong H L, Fang Q, Cheng L L, et al. Microorganism-induced weathering of clay minerals in a hydromorphic soil[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2016,184:272-288.

陈儒章,张丽萍,邬燕虹,等.侵蚀性花岗岩坡地不同地貌部位土壤剖面风化特征研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(6):1380-1388.

Ameijeiras-Mariño Y, Opfergelt S, Schoonejans J, et al. Impact of low denudation rates on soil chemical weathering intensity:A multiproxy approach[J].Chemical Geology,2017,456:72-84.

李建武,张甘霖,李德成,等.强烈风化条件下玄武岩发育土壤的元素地球化学特征[J].地球与环境,2012,40(4):491-498.

刘成禹,何满潮.对岩石风化程度敏感的化学风化指数研究[J].地球与环境,2011,39(3):349-354.

范晓娟,张丽萍,邓龙洲,等.侵蚀程度差异诱发的坡面产流-产沙-总磷流失特征[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(2):459-468.

Bookhagen B, Strecker M R. Spatiotemporal trends in erosion rates across a pronounced rainfall gradient:Examples from the southern Central Andes[J].Earth & Planetary Science Letters,2012,S327/328(8):97-110.

Moore O W, Buss H L, Green S M, et al. The importance of non-carbonate mineral weathering as a soil formation mechanism within a karst weathering profile in the SPECTRA Critical Zone Observatory,Guizhou Province,China[J].Acta Geochimica,2017,36(3):566-571.

郭媛媛,莫多闻,毛龙江,等.澧阳平原岩板垱剖面地球化学特征与风化强度研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(3):335-341.

张晓娟,季宏兵,冯晓静,等.岩溶盆地红土风化剖面的元素地球化学研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(6):944-951.

Deng L Z, Fei K, Sun T Y, et al. Phosphorus loss through overland flow and interflow from bare weathered granite slopes in Southeast China[J].Sustainability,2019,11:e4644.

周俊.海螺沟冰川退缩迹地风化:成土过程与土壤磷形态研究[D].北京.中国科学院研究生院,2014.

邱陆旸,张丽萍,陆芳春,等.基于熵权法的林下土壤抗蚀性评价及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):74-79.

孙蓓婷,高超,张燕.基于加权Topsis法综合评价典型滩涂围垦区土壤质量演变[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(2):284-293.

张丽萍,朱大奎,杨达源.长江三峡坝区花岗岩风化壳化学元素迁移特征[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):515-522.

邓龙洲,张丽萍,范晓娟,等.不同雨强和坡度下侵蚀性风化花岗岩母质坡地产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(17):143-150.

庞奖励,张卫青,黄春长,等.渭北高原土地利用变化对土壤剖面发育的影响:以洛川—长武塬区耕地转为苹果园为例[J].地理学报,2010,65(7):789-800.

齐雁冰,常庆瑞,刘梦云,等.风蚀水蚀交错区黄土粘土矿物特征及环境意义[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):159-162.

杨慧.植物对金属离子胁迫的响应机制研究[D].北京.中国科学院研究生院,2010.

温美丽,杨龙,王钧,等.南岭森林的土壤保持功能[J].林业与环境科学,2018,34(2):127-134.

浏览量

1616

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

桂东南花岗岩红壤区典型崩岗剖面风化强度对理化特性的影响

岩溶地区主量元素地球化学特征及其迁移规律——以贵州双河洞为例