湿地松林土壤生化特性和酶活性对模拟硫沉降的响应

房焕英; 肖胜生; 潘萍; 欧阳勋志; 熊永

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.045

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

湿地松林土壤生化特性和酶活性对模拟硫沉降的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 湿地松林土壤生化特性和酶活性对模拟硫沉降的响应
- Effects of Sulphur Deposition on Soil Biochemical Properties and Enzymes Activities in
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第6期页码：318-325
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 江西农业大学林学院,南昌,330045
  2. 江西省水土保持科学研究院,南昌,330029
  3. 江西省土壤侵蚀与防治重点实验室,南昌,330029
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "房焕英(1986-),女,在读博士研究生,主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail:289681987@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41303064，41761063）江西省水利科技重大研究项目（KT201716）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.045
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
房焕英, 肖胜生, 潘萍, 等. 湿地松林土壤生化特性和酶活性对模拟硫沉降的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):318-325.

FANG Huanying, XIAO Shengsheng, PAN Ping, et al. Effects of Sulphur Deposition on Soil Biochemical Properties and Enzymes Activities in[J]. 2019, 33(6): 318-325.
房焕英, 肖胜生, 潘萍, 等. 湿地松林土壤生化特性和酶活性对模拟硫沉降的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):318-325. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.045.

FANG Huanying, XIAO Shengsheng, PAN Ping, et al. Effects of Sulphur Deposition on Soil Biochemical Properties and Enzymes Activities in[J]. 2019, 33(6): 318-325. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.045.

摘要

以亚热带湿地松人工林为研究对象，通过3种水平（对照CK：pH 6.5；低硫LS：pH 4.5；高硫HS：pH 2.5）的模拟硫沉降控制试验，分析土壤生化特性及酶活性对硫添加的响应。结果表明：（1）硫输入促进了土壤酸化，0-5 cm土层土壤pH在HS处理下显著降低，5-10 cm土层土壤pH在LS和HS处理下显著降低（P<0.05）；（2）硫输入对土壤有机碳库存在一定影响，土壤总有机碳（TOC）对硫输入无显著响应，但土层间的差异性显著增加（P<0.05），土壤可溶性有机碳（DOC）受影响有限，5-10 cm土层微生物量碳（MBC）LS显著降低（P<0.05）；（3）硫输入对土壤有效氮库影响存在差异，土壤可溶性有机氮（DON）、铵态氮（NH4+-N）尚未表现出显著变化，土壤硝态氮（NO3--N）、土壤微生物量氮（MBN）均在HS处理下显著降低，且硫输入加剧土层间的差异性（P<0.05）；（4）硫输入抑制了酶活性，土壤脲酶活性在HS处理下显著降低（P<0.05），土壤蔗糖酶活性无显著变化，但硫输入均弱化了土层间酶活性的差异性。综合分析所有处理下的土壤生化性质和酶活性等指标发现，对硫添加响应敏感的是土壤pH和酶，土层是另外一个主要影响因子，硫添加和土层的交互作用则影响有限。采用Pearson分析得出，硫输入改变了土壤生化特性、酶活性等指标间的相关性程度。可见，酸雨对土壤酸化的影响是一个逐渐累积的过程，外源性硫添加对土壤碳氮及酶活性的影响存在一定差异，这可为硫沉降环境胁迫下森林管理提供科学依据。

Abstract

Taking the subtropical pine plantation as research object

the soil biochemical properties and enzymes activities were studied using three simulated sulfur deposition experiments with different levels (control treatment

CK:pH 6.5; low sulfur treatment

LS:pH 4.5; high sulfur treatment

HS:pH 2.5). The results showed that:(1) Sulfur input had a significant effect on soil acid

HS significantly reduced the 0-5 cm soil pH

both LS and HS treatments could significantly reduced the 5-10 cm soil pH (P<0.05). (2) Sulfur input had a certain effect on soil organic carbon pool. Soil total organic carbon (TOC) had no significant response to sulfur input

but its differences increased in soil layers (P<0.05). The impact of sulfur input on soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was limited. HS significantly decreased soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) from 5-10 cm soil layer and increased the differences in soil layers (P<0.05). (3) Sulfur input had different effect on soil effective nitrogen pool. Soil dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) had no significant change. HS treatments significantly decreased soil nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and increased the differences in soil layers (P<0.05). (4) Sulfur input inhibited the activity of soil enzyme. HS significantly decreased soil urease activity (P<0.05). Soil invertase activity had no significant changes

but sulfur input reduced the differences of enzymes activities in the two soil layers. The comprehensive analysis of soil biochemical characteristic and enzymes activities indicators from all treatments showed that soil pH and enzymes had sensitive responses to sulfur input. Soil layer was another major impact factor. But the interaction between sulfur addition and soil layer had the limited impact. Through the Pearson method

sulfur input changed the correlation of the soil biochemical properties and enzymes activities. The effect of simulated acid rain on soil acidification was a gradual process of accumulation. The effect of exogenous sulfur addition on soil carbon

nitrogen and enzymes activities was different. The results could provide scientific basis for forest management under environmental stress of sulfur deposition.

关键词

Keywords

references

高俊,郑有飞,陈书涛.2007-2008年南京江北工业区大气降水化学特征[J].大气科学学报,2012,35(6):697-701.

Duan L, Yu Q, Zhang Q, et al. Acid deposition in Asia:Emissions, deposition, and ecosystem effects[J].Atmospheric Environment,2016,146:55-69.

刘滔,严光彩,刘菊秀,等.酸沉降对南亚热带森林土壤主要元素的影响[J].应用与生物环境学报,2013,19(2):255-261.

Wu J P, Liang G H, Hui D F, et al. Prolonged acid rain facilitates soil organic carbon accumulation in a mature forest in Southern China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,544(S1):94-102.

Zhang X Y, Jiang H, Jin J X, et al. Analysis of acid rain patterns in northeastern China using a decision tree method[J].Atmospheric Environment,2012,46:590-596.

Lv Y N, Wang C Y, Jia Y Y, et al. Effects of sulfuric, nitric, and mixed acid rain on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activities in subtropical forests of China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2014,79:1-9.

吴建平,梁国华,熊鑫,等.鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林土壤微生物量碳和有机碳对模拟酸雨的响应[J].生态学报,2015,35(20):6686-6693.

谢德晋.长三角典型林分酸沉降特征及其对土壤生物活性的影响研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2016.

张仕斌.模拟氮、硫沉降对华西雨屏区常绿阔叶林土壤养分和酶活性的影响[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2017.

张闯,邹洪涛,张心昱,等.氮添加对湿地松林土壤水解酶和氧化酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(11):3427-3434.

Liu X M, Zhou J, Li W L, et al. The combined effects of urea application and simulated acid rain on soil acidification and microbial community structure[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2014,21(10):6623-6631.

孙海东,刘备,吴炳孙,等.橡胶树人工林地土壤酸度特征基酸化原因分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(2):49-54.

刘洪杰.酸性淋洗对土壤有机质和粘粒含量的影响[J].环境科学,1991,12(2):42-44.

张慧玲,吴建平,熊鑫,等.南亚热带森林土壤碳库稳定性与碳库管理指数对模拟酸雨的响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(2):657-667.

胡敏杰,邹芳芳,仝川,等.氮、硫输入对河口湿地土壤有机碳矿化的实验研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(11):4184-4192.

Skjemstad J O, Swift R S, Mcgowan J A. Comparison of the particulate organic carbon and permanganate oxidation methods for estimating labile soil organic carbon[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2006,44(3):255-263.

丘清燕,陈小梅,梁国华,等.模拟酸沉降对鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林地表径流水化学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4021-4030.

廖雪菊,刘甜,韦宜慧,等.模拟酸雨对桉树人工林土壤养分流失的影响[J].广西林业科学,2016,45(4):397-403.

袁颖红,樊后保,王强,等.模拟氮沉降对杉木人工林土壤有效养分的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,2007,24(4):437-444.

林岩,段雷,杨永森,等.模拟氮沉降对高硫沉降地区森林土壤酸化的贡献[J].环境科学,2007,28(3):640-646.

Zhao W, Cai Z C, Xu Z H. Does ammonium-based N addition influence nitrification and acidification in humid subtropical soils of China?[J].Plant and Soil,2007,297(1/2):213-221.

鲍勇,高颖,曾晓敏,等.中亚热带3种典型森林土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的关系[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(4):508-516.

张宇飞,方向民,陈伏生,等.模拟酸雨对红壤区茶树器官氮磷含量及其化学计量比的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1309-1316.

Singh R K, Dutta R K, Agrawal M. Litter decomposition and nutrient release in relation to atmospheric deposition of S and N in a dry tropical region[J].Pedobiologia,2004,48(4):305-311.

Kim H, Kang H. The impacts of excessive nitrogen additions on enzyme activities and nutrient leaching in two contrasting forest soils[J].The Journal of Microbiology,2011,49(3):369-375.

刘捷豹,陈光水,郭剑芬,等.森林土壤酶对环境变化的响应研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):110-117.

刘红梅,周广帆,李洁,等.氮沉降对贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(8):1387-1394.

肖海兵,李忠武,聂小东,等.南方红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀-沉积作用对土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):881-890.

Sinsabaugh R L, Lauber C L, Weintraub M N, et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale[J].Ecology Letters,2008,11:1252-1264.

浏览量

1357

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

施用生物有机肥对黄瓜不同生育期土壤肥力特征及酶活性的影响