亚热带红壤区不同土地利用方式下的土壤剖面水流特征

张海林; 杨秀锋; 易军; 刘晓利; 刘秀芸; 刘目兴; 陶凯; 李胜龙

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

亚热带红壤区不同土地利用方式下的土壤剖面水流特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 亚热带红壤区不同土地利用方式下的土壤剖面水流特征
- Characteristics of Red Soil Water Flows Under Different Land Use Types in the Subtropics Zone
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第6期页码：233-241
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,武汉,430079
  2. 华中师范大学可持续发展研究中心,武汉,430079
  3. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所,南京,210008
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张海林(1976-),男,副教授,主要从事土壤地理学与环境地理学研究。E-mail:hailzhang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41601215，41771261）湖北省自然科学基金项目（2016CFA027）华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目（CCNU17ZDJC06，CCNU18QN002，CCNU19TS005）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.033
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张海林, 杨秀锋, 易军, 等. 亚热带红壤区不同土地利用方式下的土壤剖面水流特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):233-241.

ZHANG Hailin, YANG Xiufeng, YI Jun, et al. Characteristics of Red Soil Water Flows Under Different Land Use Types in the Subtropics Zone[J]. 2019, 33(6): 233-241.
张海林, 杨秀锋, 易军, 等. 亚热带红壤区不同土地利用方式下的土壤剖面水流特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):233-241. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.033.

ZHANG Hailin, YANG Xiufeng, YI Jun, et al. Characteristics of Red Soil Water Flows Under Different Land Use Types in the Subtropics Zone[J]. 2019, 33(6): 233-241. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.033.

摘要

以江西省鹰潭市的典型旱地、稻田和林地为研究对象，采用野外亮蓝染色示踪试验结合室内图像处理的方法，量化了各样地土壤剖面染色特征参数，明确了水流类型的剖面分布规律，并揭示了土壤理化性质对水流特征的影响机制。结果表明：染色面积比（SAR）随着土层深度的增加急剧降低，0-60 cm土层的平均SAR表现为稻田（28.16%）高于旱地（21.95%）和林地（18.64%），SAR差异主要体现在5-25 cm土层；染色路径数（SPN）随着土层深度的增加先增加后减小，整个剖面的平均SPN为稻田最多（20条），旱地其次（12条），林地最少（9条）。各样地0-20 cm土层染色路径宽度（SPW）均以1-10 cm为主，水流类型从上至下依次为均质流、非均质指流和高相互作用大孔隙流；对于20 cm以下土层，旱地和稻田的SPW以<1 cm为主，水流类型分别以低相互作用大孔隙流和混合作用大孔隙流为主，林地以1-10 cm的SPW为主，主要水流类型为高相互作用大孔隙流。有机质含量、根系密度和土壤机械组成等性质影响了土壤的孔隙特征，进而影响了土壤的饱和导水率和水流特征。为提高红壤区的水分利用效率、减少水土流失，可以通过破除旱地犁底层、减少稻田干湿交替下的裂隙发育，以及增加林地植被多样性等多种方式实现。

Abstract

In this study

the water flow of red soils in upland field

paddy field

and forest in Yingtan city were studied by the dye tracing experiment and digital image analysis. The parameters of dye distribution characteristics in three fields were quantified and their water flow patterns were defined. The effects of soil physiochemical properties on the water flow patterns were revealed. The results showed that the staining area ratio (SAR) decreased sharply with increasing soil depth. The higher average SAR of 0-60 cm soil layer was observed in paddy field (28.16%) than that in upland field (21.95%)

and forest (18.64%)

and these differences in SAR mainly happened in 5-25 cm soil layer. The staining path number (SPN) in three fields increased from soil surface to 15 cm soil depth

and then decreased continuously along the soil profile. The highest average SPN of 0-60 cm soil profile was observed in paddy field (20)

followed by upland field (12) and forest (9). The soil layer of 0-20 cm depth in three fields were mainly occupied by the type of 1-10 cm staining path width (SPW)

and their water flow patterns were defined as the homogeneous matrix flow

heterogeneous matrix flow

and high interaction macropore flow successively along the soil profile. For the soil layers underneath 20 cm

the upland field and forest were mainly occupied with SPW of<1 cm and water flow pattern of low interaction macropore flow and mixed interaction macropore flow. However

the SPW of 1-10 cm and the water flow pattern of high interaction macropore flow were mainly defined for the forest soil below 20 cm depth. The soil saturated water conductivity and water flow characteristics in three fields were strongly depended on the soil pore characteristic

which was mainly affected by the organic matter content

root density and soil particle size. In order to improve the water use efficiency and reduce soil erosion in the red soil area

the methods of breaking the plough pan of upland field

reducing soil crack formation in paddy field by rational irrigation management

and increasing the vegetation diversity of forest would be efficient.

关键词

Keywords

references

倪余文,区自清,应佩峰.土壤优先水流及溶质优先迁移的研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(1):103-107.

徐绍辉,张佳宝.土壤中优势流的几个基本问题研究[J].水文地质工程地质,1999,26(6):27-30.

Larsbo M, Koestel J, Jarvis N. Relations between macropore network characteristics and the degree of preferential solute transport[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2014,18(12):5255-5269.

Jarvis N J. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores:Principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2007,58(3):523-546.

高朝侠,徐学选,宇苗子,等.黄土塬区土地利用方式对土壤大孔隙特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1578-1584.

Flury M, Flühler H, Jury W A, et al. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water:A field study[J].Water Resources Research,1994,30(7):1945-1954.

Alaoui A, Caduff U, Gerke H H, et al. A Preferential flow effects on infiltration and runoff in grassland and forest soils[J].Vadose Zone Journal,2011,10(1):367-377.

Demand D, Weiler M. A novel experiment for measuring infiltration into seasonal frozen soil//European Geosciences Union. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna Austria:European Geosciences Union,2016,18(1):642.

Wu Q H, Liu C L, Lin W J, et al. Quantifying the preferential flow by dye tracer in the North China Plain[J].Journal of Earth Science,2015,26(3):435-444.

田香姣,程金花,杜士才,等.2种土地利用方式下的优先流特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):37-41.

魏虎伟,程金花,杜士才,等.利用染色示踪法研究四面山两种林地优先路径分布特征[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):193-197.

戴翠婷,刘窑军,王天巍,等.三峡库区高砾石含量紫色土优先流形态特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):103-108.

赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7615-7622.

黄国勤,赵其国.红壤生态学[J].生态学报,2014,34(18):5173-5181.

王毅.壤中流控制机制及其生态水文效应的试验和模拟研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2011.

王亮亮,张中彬,彭新华.南方红壤丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤水力学性质研究[J].土壤,2013,45(5):875-882.

鲍文,赖奕卡.湘中红壤丘陵区不同土地利用类型对土壤特性的影响[J].中国水土保持,2011(10):47-50.

刘祖香,陈效民,靖彦,等.典型旱地红壤水力学特性及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):21-25.

毕利东,张斌,潘继花.运用Image J软件分析土壤结构特征[J].土壤,2009,41(4):654-658.

Zhang Z B, Peng X, Zhou H, et al. Characterizing preferential flow in cracked paddy soils using computed tomography and breakthrough curve[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2015,146(1):53-65.

王艳玲,刘翠英,徐江兵,等.长期有机无机肥配施条件下的旱地红壤水分特征分析[J].土壤通报,2015,46(2):334-340.

尹梅,洪丽芳,付利波,等.曲靖市坡耕地土壤养分的空间变异性及其与利用方式的关系[J].土壤通报,2013,44(1):35-41.

武琳,黄尚书,叶川,等.土地利用方式对江西红壤旱地碳库管理指数的影响[J].土壤,2017,49(6):1275-1279.

程东娟,张亚丽.土壤物理实验指导[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012:13-111.

Janssen M, Lennartz B. Characterization of preferential flow pathways through paddy bunds with dye tracer tests[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,72(6):1756-1766.

Weiler M, Fluhler H. Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils[J].Geoderma,2004,120(1/2):137-153.

邹文秀,韩晓增,陆欣春,等.不同土地利用方式对黑土剖面土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):187-193.

Kölbl A, Schad P, Jahn R, et al. Accelerated soil formation due to paddy management on marshlands (Zhejiang Province, China)[J].Geoderma,2014,228/229(18):67-89.

Zhang G L, Gong Z T. Pedogenic evolution of paddy soils in different soil landscapes[J].Geoderma,2003,115(1/2):15-29.

Liu M X, Guo L, Yi J, et al. Characterising preferential flow and its interaction with the soil matrix using dye tracing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China[J].Soil Research,2018,56(6):588-600.

赵娇娜.长武塬区不同土地利用类型土壤大孔隙流研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2012.

王鹏程.三峡库区森林植被水源涵养功能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.

黎建强,张洪江,程金花,等.长江上游不同植物篱系统的土壤物理性质[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(2):418-424.

浏览量

1396

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

煤矿区复垦土壤磷有效性对解磷菌肥的响应

花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地植被恢复措施的水土保持调控效应

晋西北黄土区典型人工林草本多样性与土壤理化性质

耕作模式对东北黑土地大豆土壤理化特性及根系生长发育的影响

滇中石漠化地区光伏阵列对微气候-土壤的影响机制及效应