1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "李永宁(1993-),男,甘肃静宁人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:lyn450618@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
李永宁, 王忠禹, 王兵, 等. 黄土丘陵区典型植被土壤物理性质差异及其对导水特性影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):176-181.
LI Yongning, WANG Zhongyu, WANG Bing, et al. Differences in Soil Physical Properties of Typical Vegetation in Loess Hilly Region and Effects on Water Conductivity[J]. 2019, 33(6): 176-181.
李永宁, 王忠禹, 王兵, 等. 黄土丘陵区典型植被土壤物理性质差异及其对导水特性影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):176-181. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.025.
LI Yongning, WANG Zhongyu, WANG Bing, et al. Differences in Soil Physical Properties of Typical Vegetation in Loess Hilly Region and Effects on Water Conductivity[J]. 2019, 33(6): 176-181. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.025.
选取黄土丘陵区12种典型植被样地,通过测定各样地不同土层植物残体生物量、土壤容重、毛管孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度及饱和导水率,研究各指标随土层深度和植被类型的变化规律及其对土壤饱和导水率的影响。结果表明:(1)除容重随土层深度增加外,植物残体、毛管孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度和饱和导水率均随土层深度减少,其中植物残体大多集中于表层土壤(0-10 cm),占总残体生物量的51.4%~85.7%。(2)不同植被类型其植物残体及土壤物理性质存在显著差异,乔木林地植物残体、农耕地土壤容重、灌木林地非毛管孔隙度及饱和导水率均最大,而毛管孔隙度与不同土地利用类型间无显著差异。(3)饱和导水率随植物残体生物量密度(0-10 cm)和土壤容重呈幂函数减小,随毛管孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度呈幂函数增大;土壤容重(BD)和非毛管孔隙度(NCP)是影响土壤饱和导水率(Ks)的主要因素,且土壤饱和导水率可表示为两者的综合非线性方程(Ks=0.6BD-4.717NCP0.203,P<0.01,R2=0.63,NSE=0.50)。此外,沙棘灌木林地平均饱和导水率最大,有利于降雨过程中土壤水分入渗,具有较强的水土保持功能。本研究结果可为黄土高原植被恢复生态水文效益评价提供理论依据。
In this study
soils from the sites of 12 vegetation plots were sampled
and plant residue
soil bulk density
capillary porosity
non-capillary porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity were measured to discuss their variations in different soil layers and vegetation types. Besides
the effects of plant residue and soil properties on the saturated hydraulic conductivity were detected. The results showed that:(1) Soil bulk density increased with the increase of soil depth
while plant residue
capillary porosity
non-capillary porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity decreased. Plant residue mainly existed in the top soil of 0-10 cm
which accounted for 51.4% to 85.7% of the total plant residue. (2) Soil properties and plant residue differed from vegetation types. In general
forest had the largest plant residue
cropland had the highest soil bulk density
and shrub land had the maximum non-capillary porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity. While no significant difference of capillary porosity was found between different land use types. (3) Saturated hydraulic conductivity decreased with the plant residue (0-10 cm) and soil bulk density
while increased with capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity. Soil bulk density (BD) and non-capillary porosity (NCP) were key factors that affect the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks)
which would simulated saturated hydraulic conductivity as a nonlinear function (Ks=0.6BD-4.717NCP0.203
p<0.01
R2=0.63
NSE=0.50). Moreover
the shrub land of Hippophae rhamnoides L. had the maximum value of saturated hydraulic conductivity
which would promote the ability of water infiltration during the precipitation and thus had a great effect on soil and water conservation. The results of this study could provide a theoretical basis for evaluating the effects of vegetation restoration on ecological hydrological process on the Loess Plateau.
李建兴,何丙辉,梅雪梅,等.紫色土区坡耕地不同种植模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):725-731.
王贤,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆市四面山典型林分土壤饱和导水率研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):29-34.
傅子洹,王云强,安芷生.黄土区小流域土壤容重和饱和导水率的时空动态特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(13):128-134.
Zhang G S, Chan K Y, Oates A, et al. Relationship between soil structure and runoff/soil loss after 24 years of conservation tillage[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2007,92(1/2):122-128.
Franzluebbers A J. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2002,66(2):197-205.
赵世伟,苏静,杨永辉,等.宁南黄土丘陵区植被恢复对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2005,9(3):27-29.
纳磊,张建军,朱金兆,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用类型坡面土壤饱和导水率研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,12(3):69-73.
易扬,信忠保,覃云斌,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):45-56.
张川,陈洪松,张伟,等.喀斯特坡面表层土壤含水量、容重和饱和导水率的空间变异特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1585-1591.
廖凯华,徐绍辉,程桂福.大沽河流域土壤饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].土壤,2009,41(1):147-151.
彭舜磊,由文辉,沈会涛.植被群落演替对土壤饱和导水率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(11):78-84.
李胜龙,张海林,刘目兴,等.稻田-田埂过渡区土壤水分运动与保持特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):122-128.
Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y Y, et al. Effect of natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on soil detachment by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2013,38(14):1725-1734.
王毅荣.黄土高原植被生长期旱涝对全球气候变化响应[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(2):161-166.
王国梁,刘国彬,党小虎.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤含水率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):31-35.
栾莉莉,张光辉,孙龙,等.黄土高原区典型植被枯落物蓄积量空间变化特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):48-53.
侯喜禄,白岗栓.黄土丘陵区森林保持水土效益及其机理的研究[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(2):98-103.
夏积德,吴发启,周波.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区坡地耕作方式对土壤侵蚀的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):64-67.
杨思存,王成宝,霍琳,等.不同耕作措施对甘肃引黄灌区耕地土壤有机碳的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(2):114-121.
吕岩,佴磊,徐燕,等.有机质对草炭土物理力学性质影响的机理分析[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(4):655-660.
0
浏览量
1485
下载量
16
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621