晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征

金晓; 陈丽华

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征
- Soil Anti-scourability and Root Distribution Characteristics in Surface Soil Under Different Vegetation Types in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第6期页码：120-126
- 作者机构：
  
  北京林业大学水土保持学院, 水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "金晓(1994-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事林业生态工程研究。E-mail:1747873318@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0501704）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.017
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
金晓, 陈丽华. 晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):120-126.

JIN Xiao, CHEN Lihua. Soil Anti-scourability and Root Distribution Characteristics in Surface Soil Under Different Vegetation Types in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2019, 33(6): 120-126.
金晓, 陈丽华. 晋西黄土区不同植被类型土壤抗冲性及表层根系分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):120-126. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.017.

JIN Xiao, CHEN Lihua. Soil Anti-scourability and Root Distribution Characteristics in Surface Soil Under Different Vegetation Types in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province[J]. 2019, 33(6): 120-126. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.017.

摘要

采用原状土冲刷水槽法，以油松林、刺槐林、山杏林、荆条地及荒草地土壤为研究对象，研究了晋西黄土残塬沟壑区蔡家川流域不同植被类型土壤抗冲性能及植物根系对土壤抗冲性的影响。结果表明：（1）在原状土冲刷试验过程中，各植被类型径流量随冲刷时间的变化趋势不明显，含沙量随时间延长先减少后趋于平稳，土壤抗冲指数呈逐渐增加的趋势。（2）各植被类型总根长密度、根表面积密度、根体积密度及根生物量密度均表现为刺槐、油松林地较大，山杏、荆条、荒草地较小且相差不大，总根系参数之间均存在正相关关系。各植被类型不同根径范围（0~0.5，0.5~1.0，1.0~2.0，2.0~5.0，>5.0 mm）的根系指标中，0~0.5 mm径级的根长密度均最大，根体积密度总体表现为细根比粗根小。（3）不同植被类型植物根系均能增强土壤的抗冲性，增强效应表现为刺槐林地和油松林地较强，山杏、荆条、荒草地较弱。植物根系指标中<1 mm径级的根长密度、根表面积密度、根体积密度与土壤抗冲性增强值呈显著或极显著正相关关系。其他径级根系参数与土壤抗冲性增强值相关性不显著。

Abstract

Soil anti-scourability of different vegetation types and the effects of plant roots on soil anti-scourability in Caijiachuan watershed of Loess Gully-Hilly Area in Western Shanxi Province were studied by using undisturbed soil scouring experiment

taking the soil of Pinus tabulaeformis forest

Robinia pseudoacacia forest

Armeniaca sibirica forest

Vitex negundo land and wasteland as research objects. The results showed that:(1) In the undisturbed soil scouring experiment

the trend of runoff of all vegetation types with the scouring time was not obvious

and the sediment concentration decreased at the beginning and then tended to be stable with time

while the index of soil anti-scourability showed a trend of increasing gradually. (2) The total root length density

root surface area density

root volume density and root biomass density of all vegetation types showed that Robinia pseudoacacia and Armeniaca sibirica forest land were larger

while Prunus armeniaca

Vitex negundo and wasteland were smaller and similar. There was a positive correlation between the total root parameters. Among the root indexes of different vegetation types with different root diameter ranges (0~0.5

0.5~1.0

1.0~2.0

2.0~5.0

>5.0 mm)

the root length density of 0~0.5 mm diameter root was the largest

and the root volume density of the fine roots was generally smaller than that of coarse roots. (3) Plant roots of different vegetation types can enhance soil anti-scourability. The enhancement effect was stronger in Robinia pseudoacacia and Armeniaca sibirica forestland

weaker in Armeniaca sibirica

Vitex negundo and wasteland. There were significant or extremely significant positive correlations between the root length density

root surface area density and root volume density of<1 mm diameter root and soil anti-scourability enhancement value among all plant root system indexes. There was no significant correlation between other diameter root parameters and soil anti-scourability enhancement value.

关键词

Keywords

references

朱显谟.黄土高原水蚀的主要类型及其有关因素[J].水土保持通报,1982,2(1):25-30.

郭明明,王文龙,史倩华,等.黄土高塬沟壑区退耕地土壤抗冲性及其与影响因素的关系[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(10):129-136.

侯春镁,李玲,温昌焘.土壤抗冲性研究方法及影响因素综述[J].现代农业科技,2017(2):230-232.

王雅琼,张建军,李梁,等.祁连山区典型草地生态系统土壤抗冲性影响因子[J].生态学报,2018,38(1):122-131.

Vannoppen W, Vanmaercke M, De Baets S, et al. A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2015,150:666-678.

王俭成.北川地区典型林分土壤抗蚀性与抗冲性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.

Baets S D, Torri D, Poesen J, et al. Modelling increased soil cohesion due to roots with EUROSEM[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms:The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group,2008,33(13):1948-1963.

李强.黄土丘陵区植物根系强化土壤抗冲性机理及固土效应[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2014.

张素,熊东红,苏正安,等.土壤抗冲性及其影响因素研究进展[J].世界科技研究与发展,2014,36(6):721-725.

徐少君,曾波.三峡库区5种耐水淹植物根系增强土壤抗侵蚀效能研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(6):13-18.

刘红岩,周正朝,刘俊娥,等.黄土区草被生长过程中土壤抗冲性及其与影响因素的关系[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):72-78.

覃淼.黄土区典型草被生长过程中根系对土壤抗冲性影响的实验研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2016.

杨玉梅,郑子成,李廷轩.不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性动态变化特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):64-68.

何淑勤,宫渊波,郑子成,等.不同植被条件下土壤抗冲性及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):75-79.

魏阜森,刘益军,代数,等.紫色土丘陵区不同耕作模式土壤抗冲性对比分析[J].防护林科技,2012(3):1-5.

伏耀龙,张兴昌.岷江干旱河谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性试验[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(7):50-55.

任改,张洪江,白芝兵.重庆四面山水源涵养林土壤抗冲性及影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(1):1-7.

Burylo M, Rey F, Mathys N, et al. Plant root traits affecting the resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2012,37(14):1463-1470.

储小院,王云琦.长江三峡重庆库区不同植被条件下土壤抗冲性研究[J].林业建设,2012(5):42-46.

吕刚,刘红民,高英旭,等.排土场边坡根系分布及其对土壤抗冲性的影响[J].土壤通报,2014,45(3):711-715.

陈晏.紫色土丘陵区土壤抗冲性及影响因素研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2007.

Baets S D, Poesen J, Knapen A, et al. Impact of root architecture on the erosion-reducing potential of roots during concentrated flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms:The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group,2007,32(9):1323-1345.

郭汉清,张勇.沙沟小流域不同土地利用方式土壤抗冲性研究[J].山西农业科学,2014,42(5):470-472.

李强,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒地土壤抗冲性及相关理化性质[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):153-159.

De Baets S, Poesen J, Knapen A, et al. Root characteristics of representative Mediterranean plant species and their erosion-reducing potential during concentrated runoff[J].Plant and Soil,2007,294(1/2):169-183.

Vannoppen W, De Baets S, Keeble J, et al. How do root and soil characteristics affect the erosion-reducing potential of plant species?[J].Ecological Engineering,2017,109:186-195.

谢欣利,王计磊,路培,等.黄土缓坡耕地粟株不同生育期土壤的抗冲性特征[J].泥沙研究,2018,43(5):52-57.

李玉婷,张建军,茹豪,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用方式对土壤抗冲性及糙率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):1-6.

杨玉梅.不同土地利用方式下土壤抗蚀与抗冲性研究[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2010.

舒乔生,谢立亚.沙棘林退化对林木根系和土壤抗冲性的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(3):380-385.

谌芸,何丙辉,练彩霞,等.三峡库区陡坡根-土复合体抗冲性能[J].生态学报,2016,36(16):5173-5181.

张金池,臧廷亮,曾锋.岩质海岸防护林树木根系对土壤抗冲性的强化效应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(1):9-12.

卢立霞,曾波.三峡库区嘉陵江岸生优势须根系植物根系对土壤抗冲性的增强效应研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,31(3):157-161.

占海歌.3种草本植物根系特征对土壤抗侵蚀性能影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017.

浏览量

1532

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

毛乌素沙地不同植被恢复类型的土壤碳水效应

生土施肥对黍子根系生长及生理生态效应的影响

喀斯特高原山地土壤抗冲性与土壤物理性质的关系

2种草本植物根系对崩岗洪积扇土壤抗剪强度的影响

黄土区草被生长过程中土壤抗冲性及其与影响因素的关系