鄂东南崩岗区花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性

娜荷芽; 魏玉杰; 陈敏; 丁树文; 蔡崇法; 李依潺; 宋萍

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

鄂东南崩岗区花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 鄂东南崩岗区花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性
- The Anisotropy of Shear Strength for Granitic Soils in Collapsing Gully Erosion Area of Southeastern Hubei
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第6期页码：113-119
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉,430070
  2. 农业部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室,武汉,430070
  3. 长江水利委员会水土保持监测中心站,武汉,430010
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "娜荷芽(1995-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail:naheyachn@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41807065）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.016
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
娜荷芽, 魏玉杰, 陈敏, 等. 鄂东南崩岗区花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):113-119.

NA Heya, WEI Yujie, CHEN Min, et al. The Anisotropy of Shear Strength for Granitic Soils in Collapsing Gully Erosion Area of Southeastern Hubei[J]. 2019, 33(6): 113-119.
娜荷芽, 魏玉杰, 陈敏, 等. 鄂东南崩岗区花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):113-119. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.016.

NA Heya, WEI Yujie, CHEN Min, et al. The Anisotropy of Shear Strength for Granitic Soils in Collapsing Gully Erosion Area of Southeastern Hubei[J]. 2019, 33(6): 113-119. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.016.

摘要

旨在从岩土力学性质的角度为崩岗侵蚀提供理论依据，采用直接剪切实验，对鄂东南崩岗区典型花岗岩风化岩土体剖面不同方向上原状土的抗剪强度进行测定，并分析了花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度在剖面尺度上的异向性及其影响因素。结果表明，饱和条件下，花岗岩风化岩土体黏聚力和内摩擦角的变化范围分别为3.19~19.26 kPa和26.50°~32.42°，其中B2层黏聚力最大，而各层次间内摩擦角的差异并不明显（p>0.05）；黏聚力和内摩擦角均存在明显的异向性，其中水平方向总体大于垂直方向，且黏聚力的异向性较内摩擦角更明显。不同方向上抗剪强度的影响机理不同，其中，垂直于剖面方向上，黏聚力主要受毛管孔隙度（r=-0.97，p<0.01）和粉粒含量（r=0.94，p<0.05）的影响，而水平方向上仅与粉粒含量（r=0.91，p<0.05）显著相关；而液限对水平方向上的内摩擦角影响显著（r=-0.99，p<0.05）。对于花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的异向性而言，其主要受自然含水率（r=-0.98，p<0.01）、有机质（r=-0.93，p<0.05）和塑限（r=-0.97，p<0.05）影响。研究结果对于从力学稳定性角度揭示崩岗的发生机理具有重要意义。

Abstract

To reveal the mechanism of collapsing gully erosion from a perspective of soil mechanic

the anisotropic characteristics of shear strength and the related influencing factors for undisturbed granitic soils from a typical granite weathered soil profile in southeastern Hubei were investigated by direct shear test. In accordance with the obtained results

the cohesion and internal friction angle of granite weathered soils ranged from 3.19 kPa to 19.26 kPa and 26.50° to 32.42° at saturation

and the maximum cohesion occurred for soils in the B2 layer

while the difference of the internal friction angle along the investigated soil profile was less significant (p>0.05).In addition

cohesion and internal friction angle with significant anisotropy were larger in the horizontal direction than those in the vertical direction. Soil physicochemical properties that influencing of shear strength varied with profile direction. Specifically

the cohesion was mainly affected by capillary porosity (r=-0.97

p<0.01) and silt content (r=0.94

p<0.05) for soils in the vertical direction

and it was conditioned by silt content (r=0.91

p<0.05) for soils in the horizontal direction. However

the significant correlation between soil physicochemical properties and internal friction angle was solely observed for soils in the horizontal direction in which the variation of internal friction angle was influenced by liquid limit (r=-0.99

p<0.05). Furthermore

the anisotropy of shear strength of granitic weathered soils was mainly affected by natural water content (r=-0.98

p<0.01)

organic matter (r=-0.93

p<0.05)

and plastic limit (r=-0.97

p<0.05). These results would facilitate the understanding about the formation and development of collapsing gully erosion in southeastern China.

关键词

Keywords

references

Deng Y S, Duan X Q, Ding S W, et al. Suction stress characteristics in granite red soils and their relationship with the collapsing gully in south China[J].Catena,2018,171:505-522.

Zhong B B, Peng S Y, Zhang Q, et al. Using an ecological economics approach to support the restoration of collapsing gullies in southern China[J].Land Use Policy,2013,32:119-124.

Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Leong E C, et al. Variability of residual soil properties[J].Engineering Geology,2012,141:124-140.

Lan H X, Hu R L, Yue Z Q, et al. Engineering and geological characteristics of granite weathering profiles in South China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2003,21(4):353-364.

Mareschal L, Turpault M P, Ranger J. Effect of granite crystal grain size on soil properties and pedogenic processes along a lithosequence[J].Geoderma,2015,249:12-20.

Yusof N, Zabidi H. Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of granitic rock from Hulu Langat, Selangor[J].Procedia Chemistry,2016,19:975-980.

Azami A, Yacoub T, Curran J. Effects of strength anisotropy on the stability of slopes//65th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, CGS Geo-Manitoba,2012.

Wuddivira M N, Stone R J, Ekwue E I. Influence of cohesive and disruptive forces on strength and erodibility of tropical soils[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2013,133:40-48.

赵建军,王思敬,尚彦军,等.全风化花岗岩抗剪强度影响因素分析[J].岩土力学,2005,26(4):624-628.

魏玉杰,吴新亮,蔡崇法.崩岗体剖面土壤收缩特性的空间变异性[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(6):153-159.

张勇.不同层次花岗岩残积土抗剪强度影响因素研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2015.

陈嘉林.崩岗土体胶结物质与其抗剪强度的关系研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2018.

林金石,庄雅婷,黄炎和,等.不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):106-110.

夏振刚,邓羽松,赵媛,等.鄂东南花岗岩崩岗岩土抗剪强度与含水量的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):26-34.

李凯,王志兵,韦昌富,等.饱和度对风化花岗岩边坡土体抗剪特性的影响[J].岩土力学,2016,37(增刊1):267-273.

Lin J S, Zhu G L, Wei J, et al. Mulching effects on erosion from steep slopes and sediment particle size distributions of gully colluvial deposits[J].Catena,2018,160:57-67.

干湿效应下崩岗区岩土抗剪强度衰减非线性分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):241-245.

Tao Y, He Y B, Duan X Q, et al. Preferential flows and soil moistures on a Benggang slope:Determined by the water and temperature co-monitoring[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017, 53:678-690.

Wei Y J, Wu X L, Xia J W, et al. The effect of water content on the shear strength characteristics of granitic soils in South China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,187:50-59.

李广信.土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004:43-44.

刘亚栋.考虑土体强度各向异性的边坡稳定性研究[D].广州:广东工业大学,2018.

张文华.花岗岩残积土的抗剪强度及土质边坡稳定分析[J].水文地质工程地质,1994(3):41-43.

Rose C W, Hairsine P B, Proffitt A P B, et al. Interpreting the role of soil strength in erosion processes[J].Catena Supplement,1990,17:153-165.

吴丽珍.南方崩岗侵蚀的岩土特性研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2006.

牛德奎.华南红壤丘陵区崩岗发育的环境背景与侵蚀机理研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009.

马媛,丁树文,何溢钧,等.崩岗"五位一体"系统性治理措施探讨[J].中国水土保持,2016(4):65-68.

Goodman R E. Introduction to rock mechanics[M].New York:Wiley,1989.

Wakatsuki T, Tanaka Y, Matsukura Y. Soil slips on weathering-limited slopes underlain by coarse-grained granite or fine-grained gneiss near Seoul, Republic of Korea[J].Catena,2005,60(2):181-203.

魏玉杰.花岗岩风化岩土体力学参数的试验研究与稳定性数值模拟[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2018.

潘良福.氧化铁胶体对崩岗土体抗剪特性的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2017.

Knapen A, Poesen J, Govers G, et al. Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion:A review[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2007,80(1/2):75-109.

Zhang W G, Zhang R H, Han L, et al. Engineering properties of the Bukit Timah Granitic residual soil in Singapore[J].Underground Space,2019,4(2):98-108.

Russell D J, Denness B, McCann D M. Shear-strength anisotropy variations in weathered Oxford clay[J].Engineering Geology,1978,12:337-344.

Fredlund D G, Rahardjo H. Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1993.

Guo N, Zhao J D. The signature of shear-induced anisotropy in granular media[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2013,47:1-15.

吴美苏,周成,王林,等.根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2019,40(310):519-526.

Tong Z X, Fu P C, Zhou S P, et al. Experimental investigation of shear strength of sands with inherent fabric anisotropy[J].Acta Geotechnica,2014,9(2):257-275.

浏览量

1302

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

干湿循环对崩岗土体稳定性的影响

2种草本植物根系对崩岗洪积扇土壤抗剪强度的影响

三峡水库消落带不同植被类型和坡位的土壤性状分异特征

干湿循环效应固化黄土宏-微观演化特征函数

冻结对沙丘土壤抗风蚀能力的影响