1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州,730000
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
[ "程文举(1996-),男,甘肃酒泉人,硕士研究生,主要从事干旱区水文水资源研究。E-mail:chengwen_ju@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
程文举, 席海洋, 张经天. 敦煌阳关西土沟流域高含沙洪水河道入渗特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):72-78.
CHENG Wenju, XI Haiyang, ZHANG Jingtian. Analysis on Infiltration Characteristics of Hyper-concentrated Flood River Channel in Xitugou Watershed of Yangguan, Dunhuang[J]. 2019, 33(6): 72-78.
程文举, 席海洋, 张经天. 敦煌阳关西土沟流域高含沙洪水河道入渗特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(6):72-78. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.010.
CHENG Wenju, XI Haiyang, ZHANG Jingtian. Analysis on Infiltration Characteristics of Hyper-concentrated Flood River Channel in Xitugou Watershed of Yangguan, Dunhuang[J]. 2019, 33(6): 72-78. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.010.
为明确无控制性工程地区的洪水入渗过程,提高洪灾防治能力和洪水资源化利用程度。选取敦煌阳关西土沟流域下游高含沙洪水河道,通过野外试验和实验室样品测定,测算了该河道下游上段到下段河床断面不同压力水头下的导水率,拟合得到饱和入渗速率,并通过实验室测样得到不同深度的饱和入渗速率,分析河床断面不同位置和不同深度土层的饱和入渗速率的变化规律。结果表明:饱和入渗速率:上段(0.003 1 cm/s) > 中段(0.002 9 cm/s) > 下段(0.002 6 cm/s);0-120 cm不同深度的饱和入渗速率上段大于中下段,中段和下段不同深度饱和入渗速率差异较小。整体上,河床两侧饱和入渗速率随深度的增加呈增大趋势,河床中心饱和入渗速率随深度增加呈减小趋势,主要是高含沙洪水流动时泥沙沿程分选沉积造成的。粗颗粒泥沙先沉积,细颗粒泥沙后沉积导致的上下段泥沙沉积层的孔隙度差异引起饱和入渗速率在河床断面和上下段以及不同深度的变化规律。由不同压力水头下测定的地表入渗速率来表征不同洪水水位下的入渗速率,经过趋势拟合发现随洪水水位升高,地表入渗率呈线性增长。
In order to clarify the flood infiltration process in the uncontrolled engineering area
and improve the ability of flood prevention and control and the degree of flood resource utilization
the hyper-concentrated flow channel downstream of the Xitugou watershed in Yangguan
Dunhuang was selected. The field experiment and laboratory analysis were conducted to measure the different pressure heads of the river section from the upper section to the lower section of the river. Under the infiltration rate
the saturated infiltration coefficient was obtained by fitting
and the saturated infiltration coefficients at different depths were obtained by laboratory measurements. The variation of saturated infiltration coefficients of the left and right banks
centers and different depths of the riverbed was analyzed. The results showed that the saturated infiltration coefficients:upper section (0.003 1 cm/s) > middle section (0.002 9 cm/s) > lower section (0.002 6 cm/s); the saturated infiltration coefficient at different depths in the upper part was larger than that in the middle and lower sections
and the difference between the middle and lower sections was small. On the whole
the saturated infiltration coefficients on both sides of the riverbed increased with the increase of depth
and the saturated infiltration coefficients of the riverbed decreased with the increase of depth. The reason for the above results was that the sediments were deposited along the hyper-concentrated flood
the coarse sediments were deposited first
and then the fine sediments were deposited
resulting in the difference in porosity of the upper and lower sediments
and the variation of saturated infiltration coefficients in river sections and different depths. The infiltration rate was determined by different pressure heads to characterize the infiltration rate under different flood levels
the trend fitting showed that the surface infiltration rate increased linearly with the increase of flood water level.
陈学林,牛最荣,黄维东,等.敦煌西土沟沙漠洪水资源开发利用模式及成效分析[J].水文,2017,37(2):73-77.
何丹,马东豪,张锡洲,等.土壤入渗特性的空间变异规律及其变异源[J].水科学进展,2013,24(3):340-348.
刘澄静,角媛梅,高璇,等.哈尼梯田水源区不同景观类型土壤水分的入渗特性及影响因子[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):99-105.
刘芝芹,黄新会,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):57-62.
徐勤学,李春茂,陈洪松,等.喀斯特峰丛坡地灌木林地与梯田旱地土壤水分入渗特征[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):124-131.
周维,张建辉.金沙江支流冲沟侵蚀区四种土地利用方式下土壤入渗特性研究[J].土壤,2006,38(3):333-337.
祝陈梦媛,付玉娟,姜国辉.不同地面处理下的降雨入渗规律研究[J].节水灌溉,2018(2):77-82.
雍晨旭,樊军,王胜.坡度对3种单环法测量坡地饱和导水率的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(2):24-30.
朱良君,张光辉,任宗萍.4种土壤入渗测定方法的比较[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):163-167.
何子淼,肖培青,郝仕龙,等.黄丘区野外草被坡面土壤入渗参数变化规律与模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):74-79.
汤英,周宏飞,徐利岗.荒漠植被影响下的沙地稳定入渗率变化特征[J].土壤通报,2009,40(2):235-239.
许丽,管瑶,孙海燕,等.极端干旱区小城镇绿地土壤水分入渗性能研究:以阿拉尔市为例[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(4):240-244.
Wang Y J, Jiang E H. Mechanism of amplifications of hyper-concentrated flood and criterion of its occurrence in the Lower Yellow River//Mynett A. Proceedings of the 36th Iahr World Congress:Deltas of the Future and What Happens Upstream. Madrid:Iahr-Int Assoc Hydro-Environment Engineering Research,2015:1925-1930.
Zhang J L, Lian J J, Wang Y J. Discussion of mechanism of "River Bottom Stripping" of high sediment concentration floods of the Yellow River//Shang H Q. Proceedings of the 1st International Yellow River Forum on River Basin Management. Zhengzhou:Yellow River Conservancy Press,2003:447-457.
陈建国,李宜斌,赵华侠,等.黄河下游高含沙洪水不同粒径泥沙的输移特性[J].泥沙研究,1996(4):12-21.
费祥俊,吴保生.黄河下游高含沙水流基本特性与输沙能力[J].水利水电技术,2015,46(6):59-66.
江恩惠,韩其为,曹永涛,等.黄河河床物质层理淤积结构及沉积机理[J].人民黄河,2010,32(8):32-33.
张琳琳,张俊.高含沙水流特性和滩槽冲淤特征浅述[J].地下水,2015,37(4):125-130.
Qin Y, Zhang X F, Wang F L, et al. Scour and silting evolution and its influencing factors in Inner Mongolian Reach of the Yellow River[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2011,21(6):1037-1046.
He L. Dramatic decrease in suspended sediment concentration carried by hyper-concentrated flood in the Lower Yellow River,China//Xie L. Advanced Engineering and Technology III.Boca Raton:Crc Press-Taylor and Francis Group,2017:145-150.
Yang M D, Lin J Y, Yao C Y, et al. Landslide-induced levee failure by high concentrated sediment flow:A case of Shan-An levee at Chenyulan River, Taiwan[J].Engineering Geology,2011,123(1/2):91-99.
覃淼,翟禄新,周正朝.桂北地区土地利用类型对土壤饱和导水率和持水能力的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):28-32.
张复兴.介绍法定计量单位常识和工厂常用的六个计量单位换算关系[J].建筑机械,1988(8):40-47.
钱宁.高含沙水流运动[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1989:96-101.
王平,侯素珍,张原锋,等.黄河上游孔兑高含沙洪水特点与冲淤特性[J].泥沙研究,2013(1):67-73.
陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):18-23.
赵景波,陈颖,曹军骥,等.青海湖西北部土壤入渗规律研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(3):90-96.
Ta W Q, Wang H B, Jia X P. Aeolian process-induced hyper-concentrated flow in a desert watershed[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,511:220-228.
席多龙,张百祖,张昌顺.敦煌西土沟流域水资源演变规律浅析[J].甘肃农业,2016(15):30-31.
郑策,卢玉东,郭建青,等.贺兰山西麓绿洲土壤水分的入渗特性[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(5):146-151.
姚淑霞,赵传成,张铜会.科尔沁不同沙地土壤饱和导水率比较研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(3):469-477.
0
浏览量
1351
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621