1. 贵州大学农学院,贵阳,550025
2. 贵州大学生命科学学院,贵阳,550025
3. 贵州大学新农村发展研究院,贵阳,550025
4. 贵州省山地畜禽养殖污染控制与资源化技术工程实验室,贵阳,550025
[ "韦小了(1993-),女,贵州三都人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤污染和生态修复研究。E-mail:1285733928@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
韦小了, 牟力, 付天岭, 等. 不同钝化剂组合对土壤铬铜赋存形态及在水稻中积累的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):349-357.
WEI Xiaoliao, MOU Li, FU Tianling, et al. Effects of Different Passivator Combinations on Chromium and Copper Speciation in Soil and Accumulation in Rice[J]. 2019, 33(5): 349-357.
韦小了, 牟力, 付天岭, 等. 不同钝化剂组合对土壤铬铜赋存形态及在水稻中积累的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):349-357. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.051.
WEI Xiaoliao, MOU Li, FU Tianling, et al. Effects of Different Passivator Combinations on Chromium and Copper Speciation in Soil and Accumulation in Rice[J]. 2019, 33(5): 349-357. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.051.
为了筛选出能有效抑制水稻各部位吸收积累Cr和Cu的有机和无机材料钝化剂组合,选取水稻土以盆栽试验研究了15种钝化剂组合对土壤Cr和Cu赋存形态及水稻各部位吸收积累Cr和Cu的影响。结果表明:15种钝化剂组合施用使土壤pH上升0.25~1.04,土壤阳离子交换量增加2.65%~50.96%,土壤有机质含量增加0.22%~17.20%,土壤可交换态Cr含量降低35.21%~55.63%;除生石灰+钝化剂4+鸡粪组合使土壤可还原态显著增加外,其他组合的土壤可还原态Cr无显著变化;土壤可氧化态和残渣态Cr均无明显变化;土壤可交换态Cu含量降低6.66%~33.42%;土壤可还原态和可氧化态Cu无明显变化;土壤残渣态Cu增加0.32%~5.04%,其中钝化剂3、生石灰+钝化剂1+鸡粪、生石灰+钝化剂4+鸡粪3个组合能显著增加土壤残渣态含量。根系对Cr和Cu的富集能力最大,15种钝化剂组合可使水稻根系、秸秆、稻壳和糙米中Cr含量分别下降4.59%~49.41%,39.84%~76.87%,7.14%~31.60%,17.32%~67.10%,水稻根系、秸秆、稻壳和糙米中Cu含量分别下降10.57%~48.41%,7.99%~52.53%,21.12%~45.11%,14.39%~66.92%。15种钝化剂组合均可降低糙米中Cr和Cu的含量,其中以生石灰+钝化剂2+鸡粪的效果最佳。
In order to screen out the passivator combination of organic and inorganic materials
which could effectively inhibit the absorption and accumulation of chromium (Cr) and copper (Cu) in various parts of rice
a pot experiment in paddy soil was conducted to study the effects of 15 combinations of passivators on occurrence forms of Cr and Cu in soil and absorption and accumulation of Cr and Cu in rice. The results showed that combined application of 15 kinds of passivators increased the soil pH
soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) and soil organic matter by 0.25~1.04
2.65%~50.96% and 0.22%~17.20%
respectively
and reduced the exchangeable Cr content by 35.21%~55.63%. Except for the combination of quicklime (L) + passivator 4 (D4) + chicken manure (M) which could significantly increase the soil reducible Cr
other combinations had no significant effect on soil reducible Cr. After application of passivator
soil oxidizable Cr and residual Cr had no significant change
content of exchangeable Cu decreased by 6.66~33.42% in the soil. soil reduciblu Cu and Oxidizable Cu had nosigificant change. The combination of 15 kinds of passivators increased the soil residual Cu content by 0.32%~5.04%
and the combinations of D3
L+D1+M and L+D4+M could significantly increase the content of soil residual fraction. Root system showed the highest enrichment capacity for Cr and Cu. After application of passivator
the contents of Cr in rice roots
straw
rice husk and brown rice decreased by 4.59%~49.41%
39.84%~76.87%
7.14%~36.10% and 17.32~67.10%
respectively. After application of passivator
the contents of Cu in rice roots
straw
rice husk and brown rice decreased by 10.57%~48.41%
7.99%~52.53%
21.12%~45.11% and 14.39%~66.92%
respectively. The combinations of 15 kinds of passivator could reduce the content of Cr and Cu in brown rice
and the combination of L+D2+M was the best.
Huang Y, Hu Y, Liu Y. Heavy metal accumulation in iron plaque and growth of rice plants upon exposure tosingle and combined contamination by copper,cadmium and lead[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(6):320-326.
王婉华,陈丽红,方征,等.土壤铬(Ⅵ)对赤子爱胜蚓的生态毒性效应[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(6):653-657.
宋伟,陈百明,刘琳.中国耕地土壤重金属污染概况[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):293-298.
李张伟,庄东红.粤东凤凰山茶区土壤铜、铬化学形态分布及茶叶有效性研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(7):1314-1320.
全国土壤污染调查公报..(2014-04-17).http://www.gov.cn/foot/2014-04/17/782bcb88840814ba158d01.pdf
刘巍,陈效民,景峰,等.生物质炭对土壤-水稻系统中Cd迁移累积的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):323-327.
陈璐,刘宇斌,党秀丽,等.牛粪与秸秆配施对棕壤镉赋存形态及玉米吸收镉的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):316-320,327.
郑向群,郑顺安,李晓辰,等.外源铬(Ⅲ)在潮土和红壤中的形态转变特征及模型拟合[J].环境化学,2012,31(12):2008-2009.
O'Connor D, Peng T, Zhang J, et al. Biochar application for the remediation of heavy metal polluted land:A review of in situ field trials[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2018,619:815-826.
Pardo T, Clemente R, Alvarenga P, et al. Efficiency of soil organic and inorganic amendments on the remediation of a contaminated mine soil:Ⅱ.Biological and ecotoxicological evaluation[J]. Chemosphere, 2014,107:101-108.
Wu Y J, Zhou H, Zou Z J, et al. A three-year in-situ study on the persistence of a combined amendment (limestone+sepiolite) for remedying paddy soil polluted with heavy metals[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2016,130:163-170.
Guo F, Ding C, Zhou Z, et al. Effects of combined amendments on crop yield and cadmium uptake in two cadmium contaminated soils under rice-wheat rotation[J].Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety,2017,148:303-310.
Ahmadipour F, Bahramifar N, Ghasempouri S M. Fractionation and mobility of cadmium and lead in soils of Amol area in Iran, using the modified BCR sequential extraction method[J]. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability,2014,26(1):31-36.
张甘霖,龚子同.土壤调查实验室分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
李平,王兴祥,郎漫,等.改良剂对Cu、Cd污染土壤重金属形态转化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(7):1241-1249.
Rehman M Z U, Khalid H, Akmal F, et al. Effect of limestone, lignite and biochar applied alone and combined on cadmium uptake in wheat and rice under rotation in an effluent irrigated field[J]. Environmental Pollution,2017,227:560-568.
辜娇峰,周航,杨文弢,等.复合改良剂对镉砷化学形态及在水稻中累积转运的调控[J].土壤学报,2016,53(6):1576-1585.
施培俊,王冠华,吴迪,等.几种有机、无机钝化剂对铜污染土壤的钝化效果研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(6):173-176.
Tang J, Zhu W, Kookana R, et al. Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,2013,116(6):653-659.
刘维涛,周启星.不同土壤改良剂及其组合对降低大白菜镉和铅含量的作用[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(9):1846-1853.
钟振宇,赵庆圆,陈灿,等.腐殖酸和含磷物质对模拟铅污染农田土壤的钝化效应[J].环境化学,2018,37(6):1327-1336.
宋琳琳,铁梅,张朝红,等.施用污泥对土壤重金属形态分布和生物有效性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(10):2701-2707.
韦小了,牟力,付天岭,等.不同钝化剂组合对水稻各部位吸收积累Cd及产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):863-894.
宋波,唐丽嵘.桂林市土壤和蔬菜镉含量调查及食用安全性评估[J].生态与农村环境学报,2012,28(3):238-242.
段桂兰,王芳,岑况,等.秸秆及生物炭添加对猪粪沼渣施肥水稻重金属积累的影响[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(11):4287-4295.
王丹,魏威,梁东丽,等.土壤铜、铬(Ⅵ)复合污染重金属形态转化及其对生物有效性的影响[J].环境科学,2011,32(10):3113-3120.
0
浏览量
1322
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621