1. 安徽省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所,合肥,230031
2. 安徽省养分循环与资源环境省级实验室,合肥,230031
3. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉,430070
4. 安徽省农业生态环境总站,合肥,230001
[ "王静(1982-),女,博士研究生,主要从事农业面源污染防控技术研究。E-mail:wangjinghf1982@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
王静, 王允青, 张凤芝, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂对沿淮平原水稻产量、氮肥利用率及稻田氮素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):211-216.
WANG Jing, WANG Yunqing, ZHANG Fengzhi, et al. Effects of Urease/Nitrification Inhibitors on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Rice and Soil Nitrogen of Paddy Field in Plain Along the Huaihe River[J]. 2019, 33(5): 211-216.
王静, 王允青, 张凤芝, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂对沿淮平原水稻产量、氮肥利用率及稻田氮素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):211-216. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.031.
WANG Jing, WANG Yunqing, ZHANG Fengzhi, et al. Effects of Urease/Nitrification Inhibitors on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Rice and Soil Nitrogen of Paddy Field in Plain Along the Huaihe River[J]. 2019, 33(5): 211-216. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.031.
添加氮素抑制剂是提高水稻氮肥利用率的有效途径之一。采用大田试验,探讨了氮素抑制剂(脲酶抑制剂N-丁基硫代磷酰三胺(NBPT)、硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)及其组合)对沿淮平原水稻产量、氮肥利用率及稻田氮素的影响,旨在为优化沿淮稻田生态系统氮素养分管理,减少氮素损失提供科学依据。以"常糯1号"为供试材料,于2018年6-10月在安徽省怀远县(沿淮平原典型水稻种植区)进行试验。试验设5个处理:不施氮肥(CK);尿素(U);尿素+硝化抑制剂(U+DMPP);尿素+脲酶抑制剂(U+NBPT);尿素+硝化抑制剂+脲酶抑制剂(U+NBPT+DMPP)。结果表明:尿素配施NBPT或者DMPP均有利于提高水稻产量、植株吸氮量和氮素利用效率,NBPT效果优于DMPP,NBPT和DMPP联合施用表现出协同增效作用。尿素配施抑制剂的3个处理U+NBPT、U+DMPP和U+NBPT+DMPP较单独施用尿素U处理的产量分别增加6.8%,4.3%,8.6%,植物吸氮量分别增加9.6%,6.5%,12.2%,与U处理之间差异达显著水平(P<0.05)。尿素单独配施NBPT或者NBPT+DMPP组合均显著提高了氮肥吸收利用率(NRE)、氮肥农学利用率(NAE)、氮素吸收效率(NUP)和氮肥偏生产力(NPFP)(P<0.05),而尿素单独配施DMPP也有不同程度的提高,但差异未达到显著水平(P>0.05)。另外,尿素单独配施DMPP或者DMPP+NBPT组合均显著提高了水稻成熟期土壤铵态氮(NH4+-N)和微生物量氮(SMBN)的含量,降低了硝态氮(NO3--N)的含量,提高了土壤中铵/硝比,而尿素单独配施NBPT对水稻成熟期土壤NH4+-N、NO3--N和SMBN无显著影响。总体认为,在沿淮平原稻作种植体系中,尿素配施NBPT或者DMPP可以有效地增加水稻产量,促进水稻对氮素的吸收利用,提高氮素利用效率,NBPT和DMPP联合施用效果最理想。
Application of nitrogen inhibitors is an effective way to improve nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of rice. The effects of nitrogen inhibitors (urease inhibitor N-butylthiophosphoramide
NBPT and nitrification inhibitor 3
4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate
DMPP) and their combinations on yield
nitrogen efficiency and soil nitrogen were studied by field experiment
aiming to provide scientific basis for formulating scientific nitrogen management and reducing nitrogen loss of paddy field in plain along the Huaihe River. A field experiment (between June 2018 and October 2018) using rice cultivar of "Changnuo" 1 as test materials was conducted in Huaiyuan County
Anhui Province (a typical rice growing area along the Huaihe Plain). Five treatments were set up
which were CK (no nitrogen fertilizer)
U (urea only)
U+NBPT (urea plus NBPT)
U+DMPP (urea plus DMPP) and U+NBPT+DMPP (urea plus combined application of NBPT and DMPP). The results showed that addition of NBPT or DMPP into urea increased the yield
nitrogen absorption and utilization
in which the effect of NBPT was better than that of DMPP
and the combination of NBPT and DMPP showed synergistic effect. Compared with U treatment
the rice yield of U+NBPT
U+DMPP and U+NBPT+DMPP treatments significantly increased by 6.8%
4.3% and 8.6%
respectively
and plant nitrogen absorption increased by 9.6%
6.5% and 12.2%
respectively
and the difference between the treatments were significant (P<0.05). Furthermore
the addition of NBPT or NBPT+DMPP in urea both significantly improved the nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE)
nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE)
nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUP) and nitrogen partial productivity (NPFP) (P<0.05). However
urea combined with DMPP also increased in varying degrees
but the difference did not reach a significant level (P>0.05). In addition
the addition of DMPP or NBPT+DMPP in urea both significantly enhanced soil NH4+-N content and microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN)
while reduced soil NO3--N content at maturity
and increased the ratio of NH4+-N to NO3--N. However
adding NPBT only had no obvious effect. In summary
adding urease inhibitor NBPT or nitrification inhibitor DMPP into urea could effectively improve rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in plain along the Huaihe River
and the effect of urea added with combination of NPBT and DMPP was the best.
巨晓棠,谷保静.我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势[J].植物营养与肥料学报2014,20(4):783-795.
朱兆良,金继运.保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):259-273.
周旋,吴良欢,戴锋.生化抑制剂组合对黄泥田土壤尿素态氮转化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):95-100,123.
Trenkel M E. Characteristics and types of slow-and controlled-release fertilizers and nutrification and urease inhibitors. Paris:International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), 2010:56.
周旋,吴良欢,戴锋.土壤温度和含水量互作对抑制剂抑制氮素转化效果的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(20):106-115.
串丽敏,安志装,杜连凤,等.脲酶/硝化抑制剂对壤质潮土氮素淋溶影响的模拟研究[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(19):4007-4014.
周旋,吴良欢,董春华,等.氮肥配施生化抑制剂组合对黄泥田土壤氮素淋溶特征的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(5):1804-1814.
Shu K L, Helen S, Mei B, et al. Using urease and nitrification inhibitors to decrease ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions and improve productivity in a subtropical pasture[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,64:1531-1535.
刘建涛,许靖,孙志梅,等.氮素调控剂对不同类型土壤氮素转化的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):2901-2906.
鲁艳红,聂军,廖玉林,等.氮素抑制剂对双季稻产量、氮素利用效率及土壤氮平衡的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1):95-104.
孙海军,闵炬,施卫明,等.硝化抑制剂施用对水稻产量与氨挥发的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(6):1027-1033.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等.土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2006.
周旋,吴良欢,戴锋.生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田水稻养分累积及利用率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(10):1495-1507.
Dillon K A, Walker T W, Harrell D L, et al. Nitrogen sources and timing effects on nitrogen loss and uptake in delayed flood rice[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2012,104(2):466-472.
张文学,孙刚,何萍,等.脲酶抑制剂与硝化抑制剂对稻田氨挥发的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(6):1411-1419.
Byrnes B H, Freney J R. Recent developments on the use of urease inhibitors in the tropics[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1995(42):251-259.
Wilson C E, Norman R J, Wells B R. Dicyandiamide influence on uptake of preplant applied fertilizer nitrogen by rice[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal,1990,54:1157-1161.
周旋,吴良欢,戴锋,等.生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田稻季氨挥发的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(2):399-408.
周旋,吴良欢,戴锋,等.生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田稻季CH
4
和N
2
O排放的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(12):1122-1130.
Rifai S W, Markewitz D, Borders B. Twenty years of intensive fertilization and competing vegetation suppression in loblolly pine plantations:Impacts on soil C, N, and microbial biomass[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(5):713-723.
0
浏览量
1209
下载量
29
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621