1. 延安大学生命科学学院,陕西,延安,716000
2. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100085
3. 陕西省红枣重点实验室(延安大学),陕西,延安,716000
[ "艾宁(1989-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事水土保持与林业生态工程。E-mail:aining_office@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
艾宁, 宗巧鱼, 刘广全, 等. 陕北黄土区浅沟土壤水分空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):85-90.
AI Ning, ZONG Qiaoyu, LIU Guangquan, et al. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Ephemeral Gully in Loess Region of Northern Shaanxi[J]. 2019, 33(5): 85-90.
艾宁, 宗巧鱼, 刘广全, 等. 陕北黄土区浅沟土壤水分空间分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):85-90. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.013.
AI Ning, ZONG Qiaoyu, LIU Guangquan, et al. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Ephemeral Gully in Loess Region of Northern Shaanxi[J]. 2019, 33(5): 85-90. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.013.
以陕北黄土区吴起县合沟流域浅沟土壤水分为研究对象,通过对研究区不同深度、不同坡向、不同坡位的浅沟土壤水分空间分布特征进行研究。结果表明:(1)根据浅沟与原状坡油松生长量关系,将浅沟划分为深浅沟(40 cm ≤浅沟深度)和浅浅沟(20 cm ≤浅沟深度<40 cm);(2)研究区浅沟土壤水分高于原状坡;浅沟土壤水分在0-60 cm土层聚集,原状坡则在0-40 cm土层聚集;(3)浅沟不同土层土壤水分变异程度不同,阳坡土壤水分变异性较阴坡小;20-60 cm土层中,浅沟土壤水分变异系数较大,土壤水分较活跃,其他土层变异系数较小,土壤水分较稳定;(4)不同坡位、不同坡向和不同深度的浅沟土壤水分存在显著差异;在浅浅沟中,土壤水分表现为下坡位 > 上坡位 > 中坡位;深浅沟则为上坡位 > 下坡位 > 中坡位;在浅沟内,阴坡在中、下坡位土壤水分显著高于阳坡,阳坡上坡位土壤水分则高于阴坡;原状坡阴坡土壤水分显著高于阳坡。
The soil moisture of ephemeral gully in Hegou watershed at Wuqi county in Loess Area of Northern Shaanxi was taking as the research object. The spatial distribution characteristics of soil moisture in different ephemeral gullies with different depths
different slope aspects and different slope positions were studied. The results showed that:(1) According to the relationship between ephemeral gully and the growth of Pinus tabuliformis Carr. on the original slope
the ephemeral gully was divided into deep ephemeral gully (40 cm ≤ depth) and shallow ephemeral gully (20 cm ≤ depth <40 cm). (2) The soil moisture of the ephemeral gully was higher than that of the original slope; the soil moisture of the ephemeral gully was concentrated in the 0-60 cm soil layer
while that of the original slope was concentrated in the 0-40 cm soil layer. (3) The soil moisture variation degree was differeat in the different soil layers in ephemeral gully. The soil moisture variability of sunny slope was smaller than that of shady slope. In 20-60 cm soil layer
the soil moisture variability coefficient was larger
soil moisture was more active
and the soil moistures in other soil layers were less variable and more stable. (4) There were significant differences in soil moisture among ephemeral gullies with different slope positions
different slope aspects and different depths. In shallow ephemeral gully
soil moisture followed the order of lower slope > upper slope > middle slope
while in deep ephemeral gully
the order was upper slope > lower slope > mid slope. In ephemeral gully
soil moistures in the middle and lower position of the shady slope were significantly higher than that of sunny slope
and the soil moisture on the upper position of sunny slope was higher than that of shady slope. The soil moisture of the original shady slope was significantly higher than that of sunny slope.
Fu B J, Wang J, Chen L D, et al. The effects of land use on soil moisture variation in the Danangou catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena,2003,54:197-213.
张雷明,上官周平.黄土高原土壤水分与植被生产力的关系[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(4):59-63.
Fang X M, Zhao W W, Wang L X, et al. Variations of deep soil moisture under different vegetation types and influencing factors in a watershed of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2016,20(8):3309-3323.
郭忠升,邵明安.半干旱区人工林草地土壤旱化与土壤水分植被承载力[J].生态学报,2002,23(8):1640-1647.
王志强,刘宝元,张岩.不同植被类型对厚层黄土剖面水分含量的影响[J].地理学报,2008,63(7):703-713.
Ren Z P, Li Z B, Liu X L, et al. Comparing watershed afforestation and natural revegetation impacts on soil moisture in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China[J]. Scientific Reports,2018,8(1):e2972.
李洪建,王孟本.晋西北人工林土壤水分特点与降水关系研究[J].水土保持学报,1998,4(4):60-65.
李裕元,邵明安.降雨条件下坡地水分转化特征实验研究[J].水利学报, 2004,35(4):48-53.
黄金柏,卢龙彬,付强,等.黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错带沟壑地形的降雨反应特性[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):142-147.
张杰,李栋梁,王文.夏季风期间青藏高原地形对降水的影响[J].地理科学,2008,28(2):235-240.
Bo Y J, Zhu Q K, Zhao W J. Characteristics of soil moisture in relation to microtopography in the Loess region of Northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Biology,2014,35(4):741-749.
赵维军,马欢,朱清科,等.陕北黄土区微地形土壤水分对降水特征的响应[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(5):118-124.
申明爽,朱清科,王瑜,等.陕北黄土区不同微地形土壤水分变化趋势分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(3):84-92.
路保昌,薛智德,朱清科,等.干旱阳坡半阳坡微地形土壤水分分布研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(1):62-65.
邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):74-77.
中国科学院西北水土保持研究所.黄土高原杏子河流域自然资源与水土保持[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1986:41-49.
朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类系统[J].土壤学报,1956,4(2):99-115.
张科利,唐克丽,王斌科.黄土高原坡面浅沟侵蚀特征值的研究[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(2):8-13.
康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.冲刷条件下黄土丘陵区浅沟侵蚀形态及产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(20):161-170.
徐锡蒙,郑粉莉,武敏.雨强和坡度对黄土陡坡地浅沟形态特征影响的定量研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):124-132.
胡刚,伍永秋,刘宝元,等.东北漫岗黑土区浅沟侵蚀发育特征[J].地理科学,2009,29(4):545-549.
耿韧,张光辉,李振炜,等.黄土丘陵区浅沟表层土壤容重的空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(4):257-262.
黄艳丽,李占斌,苏辉,等.人工林对黄土高原小流域上下游不同坡面土壤水分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):108-116.
孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):166-172.
0
浏览量
1112
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621