1. 甘肃农业大学,兰州,730070
2. 西藏农牧学院,西藏,林芝,860000
[ "马素洁(1990-),女,硕士,讲师,主要从事草地生态与水土保持研究。E-mail:yixianshilly@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
马素洁, 周建伟, 王福成, 等. 高寒草甸区高原鼢鼠新生土丘水土流失特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):58-63.
MA Sujie, ZHOU Jianwei, WANG Fucheng, et al. Effect of Soil Erosion of Plateau Zokor New Mound in Alpine Meadow[J]. 2019, 33(5): 58-63.
马素洁, 周建伟, 王福成, 等. 高寒草甸区高原鼢鼠新生土丘水土流失特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):58-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.009.
MA Sujie, ZHOU Jianwei, WANG Fucheng, et al. Effect of Soil Erosion of Plateau Zokor New Mound in Alpine Meadow[J]. 2019, 33(5): 58-63. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.009.
高原鼢鼠是青藏高原的优势地下啮齿动物,掘洞造丘是其独特的行为之一。高原鼢鼠新生土丘属于次生裸地容易导致水土流失,研究高原鼢鼠新生土丘水土流失对于合理评价其对生态系统的影响具有重要意义。利用径流小区法和风蚀桥法,测定不同地形(平地和坡地)、不同直径大小(大土丘:直径>75 cm,中等土丘:直径50~75 cm,小土丘:直径<50 cm)单位面积新生土丘年土壤流失量和有机质流失量,并比较经过1年侵蚀后的土丘与无土丘草地表层(0-10 cm)土壤粒径组成、含水量和营养成分,旨在明确高原鼢鼠不同大小和不同分布的土丘的水土流失状况。结果表明:(1)研究区平地和坡地新生土丘单位面积年均土壤流失量分别为4 039.91,3 731.79 g/m2,单位面积年均土壤有机质流失量分别为266.83,252.76 mg/m2,土壤侵蚀级别为中度侵蚀;(2)土丘表层土壤粒径<0.25 mm和>5 mm的团聚体含量均显著小于无土丘草地(P<0.05),>0.25 mm的团聚体含量显著大于无土丘草地(P<0.05);(3)土丘表层土壤肥力和土壤含水量均显著小于无土丘草地表层土壤(P<0.05);(4)雨季坡地新生土丘单位面积泥沙流失量显著高于平地新生土丘(P<0.05)。风季平地风蚀厚度大于坡地风蚀厚度,分别为4.33,3.62 cm;(5)风季不同丘型土丘的侵蚀厚度表现为大土丘 > 小土丘 > 中土丘,分别为5.50,3.59,2.82 cm。研究认为高原鼢鼠新生土丘会导致高寒草甸风蚀和水蚀发生,且不同地形和不同大小的土丘水土流失情况各异。
Plateau zokor is the dominant subterranean rodent in Qinghai-Tibet plateau and it burrows soil of the ground surface to form new mounds
which is a kind of bare land that easily causes soil erosion. It is of great significance to study soil erosion of new mounds caused by plateau zokor to evaluate the impact of the zokor on alpine meadow ecosystem. This study used the runoff plot method and the wind erosion bridge method to determine the annual soil erosion and organic matter loss on the new mounds
and compared the soil particle composition
soil moisture and soil nutrients contents between the new mounds and the surface soil (0-10 cm) on the grassland without mounds. The purpose was to clarify the soil erosion of the new mounds on different topography
including plain and slope
as well as different size new mounds
involving large (diameter>75 cm)
moderate (diameter 50~75 cm) and small (diameter<50 cm). The results showed that:(1) In plain and slope area
the annual soil loss of plateau zokor mounds was 4 039.91 and 3 731.79 g/m2 respectively
and the annual soil organic matter loss was 266.83 and 252.76 mg/m2 respectively. The soil erosion level of plateau zokor mound was moderate; (2) Both the contents of soil aggregates with size of<0.25 mm and>5 mm in mounds surface were significantly less than that of grassland without mounds (P<0.05)
and the soil aggregates contents of>0.25 mm in mounds surface was significantly greater than that of grassland without mounds(P<0.05); (3) The soil fertility and soil moisture of mounds' surface soil were significantly less than that of grassland without mounds (P<0.05); (4) The amount of sediment loss of new mounds on the slope was significantly higher than that of the plain in the rain season (P<0.05). The wind erosion of zokors' mounds on the plain was greater than that on the slope in the wind season
the thickness of wind erosion on the plain and slope was 4.33 and 3.62 cm
respectively; (5) The thickness of wind erosion of different size mounds in the wind season was highest on the large mounds
followed by small mounds and moderate mounds. The thickness of wind erosion of large
moderate and small size mounds were 5.50
3.59 and 2.82 cm
respectively. In conclusion
the new mounds of plateau zokor could cause wind and water erosion
which level depends on the different topography and mounds size
in alpine meadows.
周幼吾,邱国庆,程国栋,等.中国冻土[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:15-20.
胡雷,阿的鲁骥,字洪标,等.高原鼢鼠扰动及恢复年限对高寒草甸土壤养分和微生物功能多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2794-2802.
严作良,周华坤,刘伟,等.江河源区草地退化状况及成因[J].中国草地学报,2003,25(1):73-78.
张兴禄,李广.高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠在高寒草甸生态系统的作用[J].草业科学, 2015,32(5):816-822.
李凤霞,张德罡.草地退化指标及恢复措施[J].草原与草坪,2005(1):24-28.
周建伟,花立民,左松涛,等.高原鼢鼠栖息地的选择[J].草业科学,2013,30(4):647-653.
张卫国,江小蕾,王树茂,等.鼢鼠的造丘活动及不同休牧方式对草地植被生产力的影响[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(10):1882-1887.
周延山,花立民,楚彬,等.祁连山东段高原鼢鼠对高寒草甸危害评价[J].生态学报,2016,36(18):5922-5930.
张军,葛庆征,张卫国,等.植被性状与高原鼢鼠栖息地适合度的关系[J].草业科学,2011,28(5):836-840.
Zhang Y M, Zhang Z B, Liu J K. Burrowing rodents as ecosystem engineers:The ecology and management of plateau zokors
Myospalax fontanierii
in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Mammal Review,2003,33(3):284-294.
范月君,侯向阳.三江源区高寒草甸退化与水塔功能的关系[J].西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2016,42(1):8-13.
刘小平,任树梅,杨培岭.不同盖度草地水土流失分析[J].草原与草坪,2013(5):27-32.
刘丽,花立民,杨思维,等.放牧干扰下高原鼢鼠栖息地选择因素[J].动物学杂志,2015,50(5):725-734.
纪韵琴.天祝县旱作农业综合丰产技术措施[J].甘肃农业科技,2006(4):46-47.
张建军.水土保持监测指标的观测方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2013:98-145.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:18-96.
赵锦梅,徐长林,马瑞,等.东祁连山不同高寒灌丛草地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):119-123.
王小云.不同作物间坡面径流和泥沙流失量特征与差异分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(11):100-104.
令凡,焦健.不同土地利用方式对高寒地区水土流失的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(36):237-241.
中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
王莹,魏代红,张卫国,等.高原鼢鼠地上土丘性状季节性差异[J].草业科学,2018,35(11):2738-2743.
王太春.高寒草甸鼢鼠土丘的植被恢复与边缘效应动态的研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2007.
邓景成.灌草植被盖度对产流产沙影响的模拟降雨实验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
刘艳萍,刘铁军,蒙仲举.草原区植被对土壤风蚀影响的风洞模拟试验研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(3):668-672.
王晗生,刘国彬.植被结构及其防止土壤侵蚀作用分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,1999,13(2):62-68.
田永亮.祁连山东段高原鼢鼠(
Myospalax baileyi
)鼠丘及洞道气体研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2017.
孙泉忠,高华端,刘瑞禄,等.黔中喀斯特地区土力学特性对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):38-41.
卢嘉,郑粉莉,安娟,等.降雨侵蚀过程中黑土团聚体流失特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2264-2273.
王保一,张荣华,荆莎莎,等.降雨和坡度对路基边坡产流产沙的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(2):114-120.
张少博,李建贵,黄俊华,等.坡度对伊犁河流域土壤侵蚀的试验分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2018,53(1):110-114,123.
汪之松,唐阳红,方智远,等.山脉地形下击暴流风场数值模拟[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2019,46(3):90-98.
何俊龄,张金沙,杨莹博,等.高原鼢鼠土丘空间格局及主要特征研究[J].草业学报,2006,15(1):107-112.
李锦荣,郭建英,赵纳祺,等.乌兰布和沙漠流动沙丘风蚀空间分布规律及其影响因素[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(5):32-39.
0
浏览量
1094
下载量
15
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621