西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400715
[ "蒲境(1994-),男,四川巴中人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与流域治理研究。E-mail:547479872@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
蒲境, 史东梅, 娄义宝, 等. 不同耕作深度对红壤坡耕地耕层土壤特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):8-14.
PU Jing, SHI Dongmei, LOU Yibao, et al. Effect of Different Tillage Depth on Soil Properties of Ploughing Layer in Slope Cultivated Land of Red Soil[J]. 2019, 33(5): 8-14.
蒲境, 史东梅, 娄义宝, 等. 不同耕作深度对红壤坡耕地耕层土壤特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(5):8-14. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.002.
PU Jing, SHI Dongmei, LOU Yibao, et al. Effect of Different Tillage Depth on Soil Properties of Ploughing Layer in Slope Cultivated Land of Red Soil[J]. 2019, 33(5): 8-14. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.05.002.
红壤坡耕地不同耕作深度对耕层质量和作物产量具有重要影响。以江西红壤坡耕地示范区耕层为研究对象,从土壤属性角度,对红壤坡耕地不同耕作深度处理下垂直深度土壤水分、容重、孔隙度、土壤紧实度、土壤抗剪强度、土壤有机质、有效磷和速效钾等进行分析。结果表明:(1)不同耕作深度对土壤孔隙度、饱和含水量和田间持水量的影响为免耕 < 翻耕20 cm < 翻耕10 cm < 常规耕作 < 翻耕30 cm,对容重的影响为翻耕30 cm < 常规耕作 < 翻耕10 cm < 免耕 < 翻耕20 cm;与常规耕作比较,翻耕30 cm使土壤饱和含水量、田间持水量和土壤孔隙度分别提高了18.17%,12.67%,5.94%,土壤容重降低6.90%。(2)不同耕作深度下土壤紧实度表现为翻耕30 cm < 翻耕10 cm < 翻耕20 cm < 免耕 < 常规耕作,土壤抗剪强度表现为翻耕30 cm < 常规耕作 < 翻耕10 cm < 免耕 < 翻耕20 cm;与常规耕作对照,翻耕30 cm使土壤紧实度和抗剪强度分别降低27.07%和24.82%。(3)土壤有机质含量以翻耕20 cm处理下最高(13.48 g/kg),免耕处理含量最低(9.39 g/kg),土壤速效养分主要集中分布在0-20 cm土层,但20-40 cm土层中翻耕处理较免耕处理有不同程度的增加,以翻耕20 cm和常规耕作表现显著。(4)主成分分析结果表明,翻耕30 cm处理对红壤坡耕地土壤的综合改善效果最好。研究结果可为红壤坡耕地耕层土壤改善和合理耕层构建提供技术参考。
The different tillage depth of red soil slope farmland has an important effect on the quality of ploughing layer and crop yield. From the point of view of soil properties
the vertical depth soil moisture
bulk density
porosity
soil compactness
soil shear strength and soil organic matter under different tillage depth treatments in red soil slope cultivated land were studied in Jiangxi Province. Available phosphorus and available potassium were also analyzed. The results showed that:(1) The effects of different tillage depth on soil porosity
saturated water content and field water holding capacity were no tillage < tillage 20 cm < tillage 10 cm < conventional tillage < tillage 30 cm
the effect on bulk density was tillage 30 cm < conventional tillage < tillage 10 cm < no tillage < tillage 20 cm; compared with the conventional tillage
the soil saturated water content
field water holding capacity and soil porosity were increased by 18.17%
12.67% and 5.94%
respectively after 30 cm tillage. Soil bulk density decreased 6.90%. (2) The soil compactness under different tillage depths was tillage 30 cm < tillage 10 cm < tillage 20 cm < no tillage < conventional tillage; soil shear strength was tillage 30 cm < conventional tillage < conventional tillage 10 cm < no tillage 20 cm. Compared with the conventional tillage
ploughing for 30 cm reduced soil compactness and shear strength by 27.07% and 24.82%
respectively. (3) The average content of soil organic matter was the highest under 20 cm tillage (13.48 g/kg)
and lowest under no tillage treatment (9.39 g/kg). Soil available nutrients were mainly distributed in 0-20 cm soil layer. Compared with the no tillage treatment
soil available nutrients contents increased under the tillage treatments
among which tillage 20 cm and conventional tillage gave the significant differences. (4) The results of principal component analysis showed that the treatment of tillage 30 cm had the best effect on the comprehensive improvement of soil properties in red soil slope cultivated land. These results could provide reference for the improvement of ploughing layer soil and the construction of rational tillage layer in slope cultivated land of red soil.
赵小敏,邵华,石庆华,等.近30年江西省耕地土壤全氮含量时空变化特征[J].土壤学报,2015,52(4):298-305.
郑洪兵,郑金玉,罗洋,等.长期不同耕作方式下的土壤硬度变化特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):63-70.
韩晓增, 邹文秀, 陆欣春,等.构建肥沃耕层对沙性土壤水分物理性质及玉米产量的影响[J].土壤与作物,2017,6(2):81-88.
彭正凯,李玲玲,谢军红,等.不同耕作措施对旱地作物生育期农田耗水结构和水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):215-221.
Ghosh B N, Dogra P, Sharma N K, et al. Conservation agriculture impact for soil conservation in maize-wheat cropping system in the Indian sub-Himalayas[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2015,3(2):112-118.
龚冬琴,吕军.连续免耕对不同质地稻田土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(2):239-246.
童文杰.不同耕作深度对土壤物理性状及烤烟根系空间分布特征的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(11):1464-1472.
许迪,Schmid R, Mermoud A.夏玉米耕作方式对耕层土壤特性时间变异性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(1):64-70.
刘波,吴礼树,鲁剑巍,等.不同耕作方式对土壤理化性质影响研究进展[J].耕作与栽培,2010(2):55-58.
刘爽,何文清,严昌荣,等.不同耕作措施对旱地农田土壤物理特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(2):65-70.
黄尚书,钟义军,叶川,等.深松与压实对红壤坡耕地土壤物理性质的影响[J].土壤通报,2017,48(6):1347-1353.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.
丁文斌,蒋光毅,史东梅,等.紫色土坡耕地土壤属性差异对耕层土壤质量的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(19):6480-6493.
丁昆仑, Ham M J.耕作措施对土壤特性及作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(3):28-31.
王昭艳,左长清,曹文洪,等.红壤丘陵区不同植被恢复模式土壤理化性质相关分析[J].土壤学报,2011,48(4):715-724.
张丽娜,Evans A, 张陆勇,等.耕作方式对旱地红壤物理特性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):46-50.
齐华,刘明,张卫建,等.深松方式对土壤物理性状及玉米根系分布的影响[J].华北农学报,2012,27(4):191-196.
郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米生长期土壤抗剪强度变化特征及其影响因素[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(5):125-130.
武际,郭熙盛,王允青,等.麦稻轮作下耕作模式对土壤理化性质和作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):87-93.
李小飞,孙永明,叶川,等.不同耕作深度对茶园土壤理化性状的影响[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(5):877-883.
Zheng L Y, Yu H B, Wang Q S. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in assessment of surface water quality in Second Songhua River basin, China[J]. Journal of Central South University,2016,23(5):1040-1051.
陈吉,赵炳梓,张佳宝,等.主成分分析方法在长期施肥土壤质量评价中的应用[J].土壤,2010,42(3):415-420.
0
浏览量
1274
下载量
12
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621