北京林业大学水土保持学院, 水土保持国家林业局重点实验室,北京,100083
[ "黄乾(1995-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持、林业生态工程研究。E-mail:309574248@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
黄乾, 杨海龙, 朱柱, 等. 青海云杉造林密度与水源涵养功能的响应关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(4):279-286.
HUANG Qian, YANG Hailong, ZHU Zhu, et al. Response Relationships Between Afforestation Densities and Water Conservation Functions of[J]. 2019, 33(4): 279-286.
黄乾, 杨海龙, 朱柱, 等. 青海云杉造林密度与水源涵养功能的响应关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(4):279-286. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.039.
HUANG Qian, YANG Hailong, ZHU Zhu, et al. Response Relationships Between Afforestation Densities and Water Conservation Functions of[J]. 2019, 33(4): 279-286. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.039.
以青海省大通县安门滩小流域7种造林密度的青海云杉人工林为研究对象,利用浸水法、环刀法测定林下枯落物、草本层及0—60 cm土壤层的持水量,定量评价不同密度的青海云杉人工林水源涵养功能。结果表明:(1)不同造林密度下的林分枯落物最大持水量变化范围为1.97~7.60 m3/hm2,枯落物持水量最大的造林密度为1 725株/hm2,造林密度为2 300株/hm2的枯落物持水量最小;不同造林密度的林下草本层持水量变化范围为1.97~7.17 m3/hm2,林下草本层持水量最大的造林密度为1 575株/hm2。(2)0—60 cm土层的水源涵养功能与土壤物理性质、土壤渗透性及贮水性密切相关,土壤容重的变化范围为1.20~1.43 g/cm3,土壤总孔隙度变化范围为46.53%~53.30%,土壤容重与土壤总孔隙度随造林密度变化趋势呈负相关,密度1 575株/hm2的林地具有最小的土壤容重和最大的土壤总孔隙度;土壤渗透性能主要取决于土壤的非毛管孔隙度,二者呈显著性相关,密度为1 575株/hm2的土壤渗透性能最强,密度为2 300株/hm2的林分土壤渗透性最差;0—60 cm土层的饱和蓄水量变化范围为2 792.50~3 197.90 m3/hm2,造林密度为1 575株/hm2的土壤饱和蓄水量最大。(3)利用林地总贮水量评价水源涵养功能,林地总贮水量大小依次为D1575(3 207.37 m3/hm2) > D2300(3 164.67 m3/hm2) > D1900(3 157.17 m3/hm2) > D1650(3 141.12 m3/hm2) > D1475(3 105.91 m3/hm2) > D1725(2 998.32 m3/hm2) > D1350(2 803.68 m3/hm2)。研究结果说明造林密度为1 575株/hm2的青海云杉林水源涵养能力较好,这与当地2 m×3 m的造林规格相匹配,为青海黄土高原高寒区的青海云杉人工林可持续经营提供理论依据。
Seven afforestation densities of Picea crassifolia plantations were taken as the study object in this article in Anmentan small watershed
Datong County
Qinghai Province. Flooding method and ring knife method were used to determine water holding capacity of litter
herbaceous layer and 0-60 cm soil layer. This study quantified water conservation functions of Picea crassifolia plantation with different densities. The results showed that:(1) The maximum water holding capacities of litter varied from 1.97 m3/hm2 to 7.60 m3/hm2 for different afforestation densities. The afforestation density with the maximum litter water holding capacity was 1 725 plants/hm2
whereas the afforestation density of 2 300 plants/hm2 gave the minimum. The variation range of water holding capacities of understory herbaceous layer with different afforestation densities was as followed:1.97~7.17 m3/hm2. The maximum water holding capacity of understory herbaceous layer was 1 575 plants/hm2. (2) The water conservation functions of 0-60 cm soil layer were closely related to soil physical properties
soil permeability and water storage. The variation range of soil bulk density was 1.20~1.43 g/cm3. The total porosity in soil varied from 46.53% to 53.30%. There was a negative correlation between soil bulk density and soil total porosity with afforestation density. The forest land with density of 1 575 plants/hm2 had the smallest soil bulk density and maximum soil total porosity. The permeability of soil mainly depended on the non-capillary porosity of the soil. They had a significant correlation. The permeability of the soil with the density of 1 575 plants/hm2 was the strongest
and the worst with the density of 2 300 plants/hm2. The range of saturated water storage in 0-60 cm soil layer was between 2 792.50 to 3 197.90 m3/hm2. The soil saturated water storage with afforestation density of 1 575 plants/hm2 was the largest. (3) The water conservation functions were evaluated by using the total water storage of forest land. The order of total forest water storage was D1575(3 207.37 m3/hm2) > D2300(3 164.67 m3/hm2) > D1900(3 157.17 m3/hm2) > D1650(3 141.12 m3/hm2) > D1475(3 105.91 m3/hm2) > D1725(2 998.32 m3/hm2) > D1350(2 803.68 m3/hm2). This results matched with the local afforestation specifications of 2 m×3 m. These findings provides a theoretical basis for the sustainable management of Piceacrassifolia plantation in the high and cold region of Loess Plateau of Qinghai Province.
贺淑霞,李叙勇,莫菲,等.中国东部森林样带典型森林水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3285-3295.
杞金华,章永江,张一平,等.哀牢山常绿阔叶林水源涵养功能及其在应对西南干旱中的作用[J].生态学报,2012,32(6):1692-1702.
陈东立,余新晓,廖邦洪.中国森林生态系统水源涵养功能分析[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(1):49-54.
王玉纯,赵军,付杰文,等.石羊河流域水源涵养功能定量评估及空间差异[J].生态学报,2018,38(13):4637-4648.
丁程锋,张绘芳,李霞,等.天山中部云杉天然林水源涵养功能定量评估:以乌鲁木齐河流域为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3733-3743.
张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.北京市森林生态系统的水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):5619-5624.
吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远.江西泰和县森林生态系统水源涵养功能评估[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(3):330-336.
莫菲,李叙勇,贺淑霞,等.东灵山林区不同森林植被水源涵养功能评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(17):5009-5016.
王卫军,赵婵璞,任仙,等.华北落叶松人工林林分密度对土壤持水能力的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(10):95-98.
冯宜明,李毅,曹秀文,等.甘肃亚高山云杉人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能对林分密度的响应特征[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(9):1529-1541.
陈绍栓,许建伟,吴载璋,等.不同强度疏伐改造对马尾松林分水源涵养功能时空格局的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(20):6753-6760.
曹云,杨劼,宋炳煜,等.人工抚育措施对油松林生长及结构特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):397-402.
陈莉莉,王得祥,张宋智,等.不同密度油松人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(7):141-149.
郭梦娇,朱江,程小琴等.辽河源不同林龄油松林水源涵养能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):279-284.
刘凯,贺康宁,田赟,等.青海高寒山区5种林分的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):141-146.
王彬.祁连山典型阴坡青海云杉林生态水文特征研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2017.
孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
刘世荣,温光远,王兵,等.中国森林生态水文生态功能规律[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996:156-159.
马维伟,王辉,王跃思,等.甘南尕海泥炭沼泽地退化过程土壤特征和水源涵养功能的变化[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(9):1532-1539.
胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等.岩溶坡地不同植被类型土壤水分入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(3):597-604.
刘宇,郭建斌,邓秀秀,等.秦岭火地塘林区3种土地利用类型的土壤潜在水源涵养功能评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(3):73-80.
许炯心,孙季.无定河水土保持措施减沙效益的临界现象及其意义[J].水科学进展,2006,17(5):611-620.
张社奇.黄土高原油松、刺槐人工林土壤生态系统的功能特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北林学院,2004.
李奕,满秀玲,蔡体久,等.大兴安岭山地樟子松天然林土壤水分物理性质及水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):87-96.
徐小牛,邓文鑫,张赟齐,等.安徽老山亚热带常绿阔叶林不同林龄阶段土壤特性及其水源涵养功能的变化[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):177-181.
Whakey W R, Riseley B, Leeds-harrism P B,et al.Sructural differences between bulk and rhizosphere soil[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2004,56(3):353-360.
林大仪.土壤学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002:244-245.
马雪华.森林水文学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993:124-126.
赵磊,王兵,蔡体久,等.江西大岗山不同密度杉木林枯落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):203-246.
丁访军,王兵,钟洪明,等.赤水河下游不同林地类型土壤物理特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):179-231.
鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同密度侧柏人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):224-229.
王甜,康峰峰,韩海荣,等.山西太岳山油松人工幼龄林水源涵养能力对密度调控的响应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):133-138.
0
浏览量
965
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621