黄土高原重力侵蚀对地貌因素的敏感性分析

余璐; 徐向舟; 张茂省; 刘广全

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土高原重力侵蚀对地貌因素的敏感性分析

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄土高原重力侵蚀对地貌因素的敏感性分析
- Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Erosion to Topography Factors on the Loess Plateau, China
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第4期页码：119-125
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 大连理工大学水利工程学院,大连,116024
  2. 中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心,西安,710054
  3. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100038
  4. 国际泥沙研究培训中心,北京,100048
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "余璐(1993-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:better_yulu@mail.dlut.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0501602，2016YFC0501705）国家自然科学基金项目（51879032，41530640）延安市重大科技项目（2016CGZH-14-03）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.017
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
余璐, 徐向舟, 张茂省, 等. 黄土高原重力侵蚀对地貌因素的敏感性分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(4):119-125.

YU Lu, XU Xiangzhou, ZHANG Maosheng, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Erosion to Topography Factors on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. 2019, 33(4): 119-125.
余璐, 徐向舟, 张茂省, 等. 黄土高原重力侵蚀对地貌因素的敏感性分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(4):119-125. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.017.

YU Lu, XU Xiangzhou, ZHANG Maosheng, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Gravity Erosion to Topography Factors on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. 2019, 33(4): 119-125. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.017.

摘要

地形属性是影响降雨引发重力侵蚀的形成、演变、分布和危害的重要因素。以延安市宝塔区为例，基于已有文献和调查数据，采用GIS和RS技术，以及改进的增长率敏感系数法对影响黄土高原重力侵蚀的地貌等因素进行敏感性分析。结果表明：（1）坡度对重力侵蚀总量、滑坡侵蚀量和崩塌侵蚀量的影响较大，且都呈正相关关系；重力侵蚀总量、滑坡侵蚀量、崩塌侵蚀量对坡度的敏感系数分别达到60.5，1 616.6，89.3。（2）对重力侵蚀总量和滑坡侵蚀量而言，距河流距离、高程是次重要影响因素；而对崩塌量而言，植被覆盖率、坡面曲率是次重要影响因素。（3）研究区域中小型重力侵蚀发生次数较多，大型重力侵蚀发生频数较少，但大型重力侵蚀对侵蚀总量的贡献较大；其中，体积大于100×104 m3的大型崩滑侵蚀虽然发生频数仅占总数的13%，但其侵蚀量却占重力侵蚀总量的57%。研究结果可为黄土高原地区水土流失综合治理及生态恢复提供参考依据。

Abstract

Topography attributes are the most important factors in controlling the initiation

evolution

distribution and damage of the gravity erosions triggered by rainfall. Based on the existing references and survey data

the revised increase-rate-analysis method

Arc GIS and Remote Sensing were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the gravity erosion to the topography factors in the Baota District

Yan'an City. The results showed that:(1) The slope gradient was the most important influential variable. The total amount of the gravity erosion

the amount of landslide and the amount of avalanche were all positively correlated with the gradients and their sensitivity parameters on the slopes were 60.5

1 616.6 and 89.3

respectively. (2) For the total amount of gravity erosion and the amount of landslide

the distance to streams and the altitude were the second important factors. For the amount of avalanche

the vegetation cover and slope curvature were the second important factors. (3) The small-scale and medium-scale gravity erosion occurred frequently

and the large-scale gravity erosion had a low occurrence frequency

but the large-scale gravity erosion contributed more to the total amount of the gravity erosion. Among them

the events of large-scale gravity erosions with the amount greater than 100×104 m3 only contributed 13% to the total frequency. Nevertheless

the contribution of the large-scale gravity erosions was up to 57% to the total amount of the failure masses. The results would provide a scientific basis for soil conservation and ecology restoration on the Loess Plateau

China.

关键词

Keywords

references

唐克丽.中国水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Wang W L, et al. Which is more hazardous:avalanche, landslide, or mudslide?[J].Natural Hazards,2015a,76(3):1939-1945.

Wu W, Sidle R C. A Distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts,1995,33(4):178A.

Wu C H, Chen S C. Determining landslide susceptibility in Central Taiwan from rainfall and six site factors using the analytical hierarchy process method[J].Geomorphology,2009,112(3):190-204.

Duman T Y, Can T, Gokceoglu C, et al. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey[J].Environmental Geology,2006,51(2):241-256.

吴丽清,廖婧,王威,等.基于AHP-信息量法的武汉地区岩溶地面塌陷危险性评价[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(4):43-47.

刘艳辉,刘传正,唐灿,等.基于确定性系数模型的地质灾害多因子权重计算方法[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2015,26(1):92-97.

Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Xiao P Q, et al. Gravity erosion on the steep loess slope:Behavior, trigger and sensitivity[J].Catena,2015b,135:231-239.

Lucas-Borja M E, Zema D A, Guzman M D H, et al. Exploring the influence of vegetation cover, sediment storage capacity and channel dimensions on stone check dam conditions and effectiveness in a large regulated river in México[J].Ecological Engineering,2018,122:39-47.

张茂省,校培喜,魏兴丽.延安宝塔区滑坡崩塌地质灾害[M].北京:地质出版社,2008.

苗连朋,温仲明,张莉.植被变化与水沙响应关系研究:以延河流域为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(5):75-81.

谢全敏,夏元友.滑坡灾害评价及其治理优化决策新方法[M].武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2008.

李会中.滑坡识别与案例剖析[M].武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2011.

郑书彦,李占斌.滑坡侵蚀研究[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2005.

李苗苗.植被覆盖度的遥感估算方法研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(遥感应用研究所),2003.

曹银真.黄土地区重力侵蚀的机理及预报[J].水土保持通报,1981(4):19-22.

陈安强,张丹,范建容,等.元谋干热河谷沟壁崩塌的力学机制与模拟试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(3):29-35.

刘秉正,翟明柱,吴发启.渭北高原沟谷侵蚀初探[J].水土保持研究,1990(2):25-33.

Ali A, Huang J, Lyamin A V, et al. Boundary effects of rainfall-induced landslides[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2014,61:341-354.

甘枝茂.黄土高原地貌与土壤侵蚀研究[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1989.

松永光平,甘枝茂.黄土高原重力侵蚀的地质地貌因素分析:从发生的规模频度看区域特征[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(1):55-57.

Liu Y, Fu B, Lü Y, et al. Hydrological responses and soil erosion potential of abandoned cropland in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Geomorphology,2012,138(1):404-414.

孙尚海,张淑芝.中沟流域的重力侵蚀及其防治[J].中国水土保持,1995(9):25-27.

Crozier M J, Eyles R J, Marx S L, et al. Distribution of landslips in the Wairarapa hill country[J].New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics,1980,23(5/6):575-586.

薛强.延安宝塔区地质灾害危险性评价研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2008.

郑苗苗.黄土高原陕甘宁地区地质灾害数据库建设与危险性评价[D].西安:长安大学,2017.

Youssef A M, Pourghasemi H R, Pourtaghi Z S, et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia[J].Landslides,2016,13(5):839-856.

Pradhan B, Lee S. Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focussing on different training sites[J].International Journal of Physical Sciences,2009,4(1):1-15.

刘翠然,许铜建,樊德军,等.西峡县滑坡、崩塌地质灾害地层地貌因素分析[J].建筑技术,2017,48(12):1302-1305.

兰恒星,伍法权,周成虎,等.基于GIS的云南小江流域滑坡因子敏感性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(10):1500-1506.

Vergani C, Giadrossich F, Salbitano F, et al. Root reinforcement dynamics of European coppice woodlands and their effect on shallow landslides:A review[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2017,167:88-102.

浏览量

1105

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于GIS的祖厉河流域土壤侵蚀治理模式模拟研究

基于GIS与RS的杨凌区土壤侵蚀时空变异性研究

基于电阻层析成像技术的黄土区多土地利用类型土壤水分反演

放牧踩踏破坏土壤物理结皮对风蚀的影响

黄土高原植被NEP时空变化及对气温降水和退耕还林（草）的响应