不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌玉米农田水盐及产量的影响

田彤; 李仙岳; 史海滨; 郭宇; 朱科; 丁宗江; 冷旭; 胡琦

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.03.039

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌玉米农田水盐及产量的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌玉米农田水盐及产量的影响
- Effects of Leaching at Different Growth Stages on Soil Water, Soil Salt and Yield in a Drip-irrigated Maize Farmland with Brackish Water
- 水土保持学报 2019年33卷第3期页码：260-267
- 作者机构：
  
  内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特,010018
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "田彤(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事节水灌溉理论与技术研究。E-mail:447461383@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0400205）国家自然科学基金项目（51469022，51669020）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.03.039
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
田彤, 李仙岳, 史海滨, 等. 不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌玉米农田水盐及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(3):260-267.

TIAN Tong, LI Xianyue, SHI Haibin, et al. Effects of Leaching at Different Growth Stages on Soil Water, Soil Salt and Yield in a Drip-irrigated Maize Farmland with Brackish Water[J]. 2019, 33(3): 260-267.
田彤, 李仙岳, 史海滨, 等. 不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌玉米农田水盐及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(3):260-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.03.039.

TIAN Tong, LI Xianyue, SHI Haibin, et al. Effects of Leaching at Different Growth Stages on Soil Water, Soil Salt and Yield in a Drip-irrigated Maize Farmland with Brackish Water[J]. 2019, 33(3): 260-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.03.039.

摘要

为了明确不同淋洗时间对微咸水滴灌农田脱盐和增产的影响，在内蒙古河套灌区进步村节水综合试验站开展了微咸水滴灌试验，分别在拔节期（T1）、抽雄期（T2）、灌浆期（T3）设置1次畦灌淋洗，以及生育期无淋洗（CK）共4个处理，研究不同生育期淋洗对微咸水滴灌农田水盐及作物产量的影响。结果表明：不同生育期淋洗后0—60 cm平均土壤含水率提高了18.9%，且T1、T2和T3处理0—40 cm土壤含水率显著高于CK处理，持续时间分别为12，25，28天）生育期淋洗后土壤储水量和作物耗水量分别平均增加了20.92%和21.52%。生育期淋洗后膜内平均盐分降低了78.0%，拔节期、抽雄期、灌浆期淋洗后盐分分别下降了0.20，0.36，0.44 mS/cm。淋洗后膜内0—60 cm脱盐率平均提高55.01%，60—100 cm脱盐率平均提高125.79%，且淋洗后膜外脱盐率高于膜内，平均高38.90%。拔节期淋洗显著提高产量及其构成因子，产量提高了18.8%，穗长、穗宽和行粒数分别提高6.8%，5.5%，7.0%，收获指数提高了7.8%（P<0.05））抽雄期淋洗产量提高了8.1%（P<0.05），而灌浆期淋洗对产量无显著影响（P>0.05），故在拔节期淋洗土壤作物受盐分胁迫时间较短，增产效应最明显。

Abstract

In order to improve crop yield under drip irrigation with brackish water and to clarify the effects of different leaching time on desalination and increasing yield

a salt leaching was conducted at the jointing stage (T1)

tasseling stage (T2) and filling stage (T3) respectively in the Jingbu saving water experiment station of the Hetao irrigation area

Inner Mongolia. With no leaching in the growth period as control (CK)

a total of 4 treatments were carried out to study the effects of leaching at different growth stages on soil water and salt and crop yield under mulched drip irrigation with brackish water. The results showed that the soil water contents increased by 18.9% from 0-60 cm after leaching at different growth stages

and the soil water contents of 0-40 cm under T1

T2 and T3 were significantly higher than that of CK

which durations were 12

28 days respectively. After the salt leaching

the soil water storages and water consumptions increased by 20.92% and 21.52%

respectively. The average salt contents below mulch decreased by 78.0% after leaching

and the salt content decreased by 0.20

0.36

0.44 mS/cm after leaching at jointing and tasseling and filling stage respectively. After leaching

the desalination rates below mulch increased by 55.01% from 0-60 cm

and by 125.79% from 60-100 cm. The desalination rates beyond mulch after leaching was higher than that below mulch by 38.9% averagely. The salt leaching at the jointing stage significantly increased maize yield and its components

by 18.8% for yield

by 6.8%

5.5% and 7.0% for spike length

ear width and grain number

respectively

and by 7.8% (P<0.05) for harvest index. The salt leaching at the tasseling stage increased yield by 8.1% (P<0.05)

but the effect of leaching at the filling period was not significant (P>0.05). Therefore

the salt leaching at the jointing stage resulted in the less salt stress

under which crop yield could be increased obviously.

关键词

Keywords

references

李金刚,屈忠义,黄永平,等.微咸水膜下滴灌不同灌水下限对盐碱地土壤水盐运移及玉米产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):217-223.

田富强,温洁,胡宏昌,等.滴灌条件下干旱区农田水盐运移及调控研究进展与展望[J].水利学报,2018,49(1):126-135.

王全九,单鱼洋.微咸水灌溉与土壤水盐调控研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(12):117-126.

郭丽,郑春莲,曹彩云,等.长期咸水灌溉对小麦光合特性与土壤盐分的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(1):183-190.

宋露露,田军仓,王怀博,等.基于正交试验的温室甜瓜微咸水灌溉管理模式优化[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(2):36-39.

Chen W, Hou Z, Wu L, et al. Evaluating salinity distribution in soil irrigated with saline water in arid regions of northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(12):2001-2008.

Hu H C, Tian F Q, Hu H P. Soil particle size distribution and its relationship with soil water and salt under mulched drip irrigation in Xinjiang of China[J]. Science China(Technological Sciences), 2011, 54(6):1568-1574.

Chedlia B A, Salwa M, Bechir B R, et al. Saline water irrigation effects on soil salinity distribution and some physiological responses of field grown Chemlali olive[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 113:538-549.

汪洋,田军仓,高艳明,等.非耕地温室番茄微咸水灌溉试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(1):12-16.

刘小刚,朱益飞,余小弟,等.不同水头和土壤容重下微润灌湿润体内水盐分布特性[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(7):189-197.

胡宏昌,田富强,张治,等.干旱区膜下滴灌农田土壤盐分非生育期淋洗和多年动态[J].水利学报,2015,46(9):1037-1046.

Phocaides A. Handbook on Pressurized Irrigation Techniques[M]. 2nd ed. Rome:Food and Agriculture Organi-zation of the United Nations, 2007.

卢星航,史海滨,李瑞平,等.覆盖后秋浇对翌年春玉米生育期水热盐及产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):148-154.

杨树青,叶志刚,史海滨,等.蒙河套灌区咸淡水交替灌溉模拟及预测[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(8):8-17.

朱成立,强超,黄明逸,等.咸淡水交替灌溉对滨海垦区夏玉米生理生长的影响[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(12):253-261.

闵勇,朱成立,舒慕晨,等.微咸水-淡水交替灌溉对夏玉米光合日变化的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(3):9-17.

张刘东,王庆明.咸水非充分灌溉对土壤盐分分布的影响及SWAP模型模拟[J].节水灌溉,2015(7):32-35,39.

郭仁松,林涛,徐海江,等.微咸水滴灌对绿洲棉田水盐运移特征及棉花产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):211-216.

郑凤杰,杨培岭,任树梅,等.微咸水滴灌对食用葵花的生长影响及其临界矿化度的研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(12):19-23.

李彬,史海滨,张建国,等.节水改造前后内蒙古河套灌区地下水水化学特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(21):99-110.

朱成立,舒慕晨,张展羽,等.咸淡水交替灌溉对土壤盐分分布及夏玉米生长的影响[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(10):220-228,201.

马文军,程琴娟,李良涛,等.微咸水灌溉下土壤水盐动态及对作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):73-80.

栗现文,靳孟贵,袁晶晶,等.微咸水膜下滴灌棉田漫灌洗盐评价[J].水利学报,2014,45(9):1091-1098,1105.

孙林,罗毅,杨传杰,等.不同灌溉量膜下微咸水滴灌土壤盐分分布与积累特征[J].土壤学报,2012,49(3):428-436.

浏览量

1024

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

秸秆还田与种植密度对玉米氮素吸收利用与产量的影响

微咸水滴灌下不同离子组成对土壤盐分、玉米离子吸收特性及产量的影响

黄土保护性耕作对农田土壤结构、水分及玉米产量的影响

耕作模式对东北黑土地大豆土壤理化特性及根系生长发育的影响

包膜氯化钾对土壤养分供应强度及玉米产量、品质的影响