1. 甘肃农业大学水利水电工程学院,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃省水利厅水土保持局,兰州,730030
[ "朱燕琴(1979-),女,硕士,讲师,主要从事农业水利工程研究。E-mail:zhuyq@gsau.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
朱燕琴, 赵志斌, 齐广平. 黄土丘陵区植被类型和降雨对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(2):9-16.
ZHU Yanqin, ZHAO Zhibin, QI Guangping. Effects of Vegetation Types and Rainfall Regimes on Slope Erosion and Sediment Yield in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J]. 2019, 33(2): 9-16.
朱燕琴, 赵志斌, 齐广平. 黄土丘陵区植被类型和降雨对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(2):9-16. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.02.002.
ZHU Yanqin, ZHAO Zhibin, QI Guangping. Effects of Vegetation Types and Rainfall Regimes on Slope Erosion and Sediment Yield in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J]. 2019, 33(2): 9-16. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.02.002.
基于定西市安家沟流域2014-2016年连续3年侵蚀性降雨产流产沙资料,研究了植被类型和降雨对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响。结果表明,侵蚀性降雨可分为3类:A雨型(短历时、中高雨强)、B雨型(中雨量、小雨强)和C雨型(大雨量、小雨强),产流产沙频次为B雨型 > C雨型 > A雨型。径流系数油松林(6.915%~9.379%)、小麦地(5.838%~9.034%)和苜蓿地(6.610%~9.671%)分别是冰草地(2.724%~5.246%)的1.7~2.5倍,是沙棘林(2.296%~3.863%)的2~3倍。A雨型的径流系数大于B雨型和C雨型,B雨型和C雨型是产流的主要降雨类型。年均土壤流失量为小麦地(1.478~3.478 t/hm2) > 苜蓿地(0.558~2.079 t/hm2) > 油松林(0.459~0.887 t/hm2) > 冰草地(0.097~0.253 t/hm2) > 沙棘林(0.012~0.038 t/hm2)。小麦地的土壤流失量分别是油松林的3~5倍,是冰草地的14倍,在坡度10°,15°,20°年均土壤流失量分别是沙棘林的123,130,92倍。C雨型对油松林产沙量的贡献率最大,B雨型次之,A雨型最小。A雨型对沙棘林产沙量的贡献率高达79%~86%,高强度、短历时降雨是沙棘林产沙的主要雨型。A雨型对小麦地和苜蓿地产沙量贡献率随着坡度的增大而增大,在坡度20°中、高雨强是小麦地和苜蓿地产沙量增加的主要雨型。小麦地、苜蓿地、油松林、冰草地的径流深与土壤流失量之间呈极显著线性正相关关系(P<0.01),土壤流失量的增速为小麦地 > 苜蓿地 > 油松林 > 冰草地,随着坡度的增大产沙速度加快。研究结果可为坡面侵蚀预报模型的建立提供重要的理论依据,同时对科学指导坡面水土保持措施配置有重要的实践意义。
Based on the observed data on runoff plots of Anjiagou watershed in 2014-2016 in Dingxi City
Gansu Province
the effects of vegetation types and rainfall regimes on slope erosion and sediment yield were studied. The results showed that:the erosive rainfall could be classified into three patterns:pattern A was an aggregation of rainfall events with short duration and medium to high intensity
pattern B with moderate rainfall and low intensity
and pattern C with heavy rainfall and low intensity. The rainfall frequency of runoff and sediment generation was pattern B > pattern C > pattern A. The runoff coefficients of pine forest (6.915%~9.379%)
wheat field (5.838%~9.034%) and alfalfa land (6.610%~9.671%) were 1.7~2.5 times than that of ice grassland (2.724%~5.246%) and 2~3 times of seabuckthorn forest (2.296%~3.863%) respectively. The runoff coefficient of pattern A was greater than those of pattern B and C. Pattern B and C were the main rainfall patterns of runoff generation. Annual average amount of soil loss was as followed:wheat field (1.478~3.478 t/hm2)>alfalfa land (0.558~2.079 t/hm2)>pine forest (0.459~0.887 t/hm2)>ice grassland (0.097~0.253 t/hm2)>seabuckthorn forest (0.012~0.038 t/hm2). The amount of soil loss of wheat fields was 3~5 times than that of pine forest
and 14 times of ice grassland
reached 123
130 and 92 times of that of seabuckthorn forest at the slope gradient of 10°
15° and 20°
respectively. The contribution rate of pattern C to sediment yield of pine forest was the largest
pattern B was the second
and pattern A was the smallest. The contribution rates of pattern A to sediment yield of seabuckthorn forest reached 79%~86%. So high intensity and short duration rainfall was the main rainfall pattern causing soil loss in seabuckthorn forest. The contribution rates of pattern A to sediment yield increased with the increases of slope gradients in wheat field and alfalfa land. At the slope gradient of 20°
rainfall with medium to high rain intensities was the main rainfall pattern causing soil loss. There was a very significantly positive linear correlation (P<0.01) between the runoff depth and the amount of soil loss in wheat field
alfalfa land
pine forest and ice grassland
and the increment speed of soil loss was:wheat fields > alfalfa land > pine forest > ice grassland. At the same time
the increment speed of sediment yield was accelerated as the slope gradients increased. These findings could provide theoretical basis for building the soil erosion prediction model and important practical significance to scientifically guide the allocation of soil and water conservation measures on slope land.
袁晓波,尚振艳,牛得草.黄土高原生态退化与恢复[J].草业科学,2015,32(3):363-371.
马鹏.降雨因素对坡面产流产沙影响的研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
林锦阔,李子君,许海超,等.降雨因子对沂蒙山区不同土地利用方式径流小区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):7-12.
艾宁,魏天兴,朱清科.陕北黄土高原不同植被类型下降雨对坡面径流侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):26-30.
李淼,宋孝玉,孟彩侠.黄土沟壑区不同下垫面条件对产流产沙的影响[C]//周孝德.水与社会经济发展的相互影响及作用:全国第三届水问题研究学术研讨会论文集.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005:144-148.
姜娜,邵明安.黄土高原小流域不同坡地利用方式的水土流失特征[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(6):36-41.
徐佳,刘普灵,邓瑞芬.黄土坡面不同植被恢复阶段的减流减沙效益研究[J].地理科学,2012,32(11):1391-1396.
廖义善,孔朝晖,卓慕宁,等.华南红壤区坡面产流产沙对植被的响应[J].水利学报,2017,48(5):613-622.
韩加强,高晓飞,路炳军,等.水保措施对褐土水稳性大团聚体的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):50-53.
王库.植物根系对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J].土壤与环境,2001,10(3):250-252.
江淼华,黄荣珍,谢锦升,等.不同雨强对裸露坡地水土流失的影响研究[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2011,6(4):24-28.
牛俊,赵西宁,吴普特,等.典型黄土坡面天然草地产流产沙规律试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(4):88-93.
寇馨月,姜学兵,黄俊.红壤区小流域次降雨产流产沙因素分析及模型构建[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(6):34-42.
李赛.鲁中山地天然降雨对径流小区产流产沙的影响[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2016.
Wei W, Chen L D, Fu B J, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,335(1):247-258.
王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.
陈众,田丰,董俊.不同土地利用方式对丘陵山区坡面侵蚀产沙量的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(1):186-192.
Mohr C, Bronstert A, Huber A, et al. Influence of different forest management practices and vegetation cover on runoff generation and sediment flux in the Coastal Range of Southern Chile[J].European Geosciences Union,2010,57(4):209-213.
Cerdà A, Morera A G, Bodí M B. Soil and water losses from new citrus orchards growing on sloped soils in the western Mediterranean basin[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Land Forms,2010,34(13):1822-1830.
王蕙,胡秀君,山成菊.雨强和坡度对嵌套砾石红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):24-29.
陈杰,刘文兆,王文龙,等.长武黄土高塬沟壑区降水及侵蚀性降雨特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):27-31.
李金涛,刘文杰,卢洪健.土壤斥水性研究进展[J].西南林学院学报,2010,30(5):82-87.
李广,黄高宝.雨强和土地利用方式对黄土丘陵区水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):85-90.
0
浏览量
1305
下载量
20
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621