不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响

聂天宏; 韩学博; 王海龙; 黄化刚; 班国军; 张龙; 杨兴; 车磊

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.050

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响
- Effect of Different Biochars on Soil Conservation, Growth and Quality of the Flue-cured Tobacco
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第6期页码：346-351
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,杭州,311300
  2. 河南农业大学作物学博士后科研流动站毕节工作站,郑州,450002
  3. 贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司,贵州,毕节,551700
  4. 湖州师范学院工学院,浙江,湖州,313000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "聂天宏(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土环境保护研究。E-mail:nietianhongtt@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  中国博士后科学基金第57批面上项目（2015M572107）贵州省毕节市烟草公司专项基金项目（BJYC201308）浙江省重大科技专项（2015C03019）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.050
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
聂天宏, 韩学博, 王海龙, 等. 不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):346-351.

NIE Tianhong, HAN Xuebo, WANG Hailong, et al. Effect of Different Biochars on Soil Conservation, Growth and Quality of the Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. 2018, 32(6): 346-351.
聂天宏, 韩学博, 王海龙, 等. 不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):346-351. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.050.

NIE Tianhong, HAN Xuebo, WANG Hailong, et al. Effect of Different Biochars on Soil Conservation, Growth and Quality of the Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. 2018, 32(6): 346-351. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.050.

摘要

通过盆栽试验，研究施加等量（3%）椰壳炭、竹炭、猪炭和烟秆炭对植烟土壤基本理化性质、土壤养分、烤烟生长状况以及烤烟常规化学成分的影响。结果表明：施用生物质炭对土壤电导率、有效养分含量、有机碳含量和酶活性有显著影响，其中施用竹炭后土壤有机碳含量较CK增幅最大，达146.37%；而施加猪炭能显著提高植烟土壤中电导率、有效磷、速效钾含量以及过氧化氢酶和脲酶的活性（p<0.05）。生物质炭对烤烟农艺性状的影响较小，仅在猪炭处理下，烤烟茎围较对照增加0.78 cm。施用生物质炭能显著提高烤烟的生物量（p<0.05），其中猪炭和烟秆炭处理下烤烟叶片干质量较CK分别提高了58.07%和47.01%。另外，在施用竹炭、猪炭和烟秆炭后，烤烟叶片中烟碱、总氮、还原糖和钾均处于优质烟叶适宜范围内。猪炭处理还可以显著提高烟叶氯含量（p<0.05），并使烤后烟叶糖碱比和氮碱比达到优质烟叶标准。综上所述，在各类生物质炭中，施用猪炭和烟秆炭对于改善植烟土壤理化性质和养分状况、提高烤烟产量和品质的效果较好。

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different biochars derived from coconut shell

bamboo sawdust

dead pig and tobacco stalk respectively (at 3% application rate) on the physicochemical properties of tobacco-planting soil

agronomic characteristics of tobacco plant and chemical composition of the flue-cured tobacco leaves. The results showed that the electrical conductivity

contents of available nutrients and organic carbon and enzyme activities of the tobacco-planting soil were influenced significantly by the application of different biochars. The highest content of soil organic carbon was observed in the bamboo biochar treatment

which increased by 146.37% compared to the control. Moreover

the application of pig biochar significantly (p<0.05) increased the electrical conductivity

available phosphorus and potassium

and promoted the activities of catalase and urease in tobacco-planting soil. The application of biochars had a slight influence on the agronomic traits of tobacco plant. The stem girth of tobacco plant in pig biochar treatment increased by 0.78 cm compared to the control. The biomass of tobacco plant significantly (p<0.05) increased

as the dry weight of tobacco leaves increased by 58.07% and 47.01% in the pig biochar and tobacco stalk biochar treatments

respectively

compared to the control. In addition

after the application of bamboo biochar

pig biochar and tobacco stalk biochar

the contents of nicotine

nitrogen

potassium and reducing sugar in flue-cured tobacco leaves all conformed to the standard of high quality tobacco. The application of pig biochar also significantly (p<0.05) increased the content of chloride in flue-cured tobacco leaves

and adjusted the sugar/nicotine and nitrogen/nicotine ratios to meet the standard of high quality tobacco. In conclusion

pig and tobacco stalk biochars were more effective than others in improving tobacco-planting soil properties and nutrient status

as well as promoting tobacco biomass and quality in the present study.

关键词

Keywords

references

黄东兵,刘骏.当前经济形势下贵州烟草商业经济发展模式研究[J].中外交流,2016(26):1.

郭亚利,刘锦华,王仕海,等.植烟土壤保育及改良技术的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2016,44(4):79-85.

Nie C, Yang X, Niazi N K, et al. Impact of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar on heavy metal availability and microbial activity:A field study[J].Chemosphere,2018,200:274-282.

唐行灿,陈金林.生物炭对土壤理化和微生物性质影响研究进展[J].生态科学,2018,37(1):192-199.

黄刘亚,孙永波,刘书武,等.生物炭对植烟土壤主要性状和烤烟产质量影响的研究进展[J].作物杂志,2017(4):15-20.

陆扣萍,郭茜,胡国涛,等.猪炭和竹炭的理化特性差异及其对菜地土壤氨挥发的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(4):647-655.

Yang X, Lu K, Mcgrouther K, et al. Bioavailability of Cd and Zn in soils treated with biochars derived from tobacco stalk and dead pigs[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2017,17(3):751-762.

郭茜,陆扣萍,胡国涛,等.死猪炭和竹炭对菜地土壤理化性质和蔬菜产量的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(2):244-252.

叶协锋,周涵君,李志鹏,等.生物炭类型对植烟土壤碳库及烤后烟叶质量的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2018,24(4):77-85.

鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.

关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.

黄化刚,班国军,陈垚,等.多孔改良剂对毕节烟区土壤性状及烤烟产质量的影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(6):1427-1437.

Lu K, Yang X, Shen J, et al. Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn to Sedum plumbizincicola[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2014,191:124-132.

徐秋桐,邱志腾,章明奎.生物质炭对不同pH土壤中碳氮磷的转化与形态的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2014,40(3):303-313.

Dong D, Yang M, Wang C, et al. Responses of methane emissions and rice yield to applications of biochar and straw in a paddy field[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2013,13(8):1450-1460.

王秋月,杨兴,何丽芝,等.酸化猪炭对土壤中不同形态磷质量分数及相互转化的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(3):387-397.

Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, et al. Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2017,186(2):285-292.

赵世翔,于小玲,李忠徽,等.不同温度制备的生物质炭对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响:对土壤活性有机碳的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(1):333-342.

李志刚,张继光,申国明,等.烟秆生物质炭对土壤碳氮矿化的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(2):16-22.

Deenik J L, Mcclellan T, Uehara G, et al. Charcoal volatile matter content influences plant growth and soil nitrogen transformations[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2010,74(4):1259-1270.

吕一甲,屈忠义.生物炭肥料对河套灌区耕层土壤肥力及含水率影响的研究[J].节水灌溉,2015(3):18-21.

刘卉,周清明,黎娟,等.生物炭对植烟土壤养分的影响[J].中国农业科技报,2016,18(3):150-155.

王成己,陈庆荣,陈曦,等.烟秆生物质炭对烟草根际土壤养分及细菌群落的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2017,38(1):42-47.

张清梅,刘金泉,李明,等.生物炭对黄瓜根际土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2017,41(19):131-136.

刘领,王艳芳,宋久洋,等.生物炭与氮肥减量配施对烤烟生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J].河南农业科学,2016,45(2):62-66.

陈丹梅,陈晓明,梁永江,等.种植模式对土壤酶活性和真菌群落的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(2):77-84.

Xu G, Lv Y, Sun J, et al. Recent advances in biochar applications in agricultural soils: Benefits and environmental implications[J].Clean-Soil Air Water,2012,40(10):1093-1098.

周玉祥,宋子岭,孔涛,等.不同秸秆生物炭对露天煤矿排土场土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J].环境化学,2017,36(1):106-113.

熊佰炼,谭必勇.生物质炭还田利用对土壤酶活性影响研究现状[J].遵义师范学院学报,2017,19(3):106-110.

刘建波,毛家伟,张绵中,等.周口市烟区不同优化施肥处理对烤烟生长发育及经济性状的影响[J].现代农业科技,2016(1):28.

王丽渊,刘国顺,王林虹,等.生物质炭对烤烟干物质积累量及根际土壤理化性质的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(1):140-144.

赵殿峰,徐静,罗璇,等.生物炭对土壤养分、烤烟生长以及烟叶化学成分的影响[J].西北农业学报,2014,23(3):85-92.

黎妍妍,许自成,王金平,等.湖南烤烟总糖、还原糖含量与几种土壤养分的关系分析[J].土壤通报,2007,38(5):911-914.

浏览量

1246

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

生物质炭对烤烟旺长期根系发育及光合特性的影响

黄土高原典型灌草植物根系生物力学特性及其相互关系

河西走廊盐碱地4种典型植被类型土壤理化性质和酶活性特征

生物炭添加对盐渍土CT孔隙序列分形特征来源的影响

滇中亚高山草甸土理化性质和崩解特性关系