耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响

吴萍萍; 李录久; 耿言安; 姚文麒

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响
- Effects of Tillage and Fertilization on Physicochemical Properties of Albic Soil and Rice Yields in Jianghuai Region
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第6期页码：243-248
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 安徽省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所, 养分循环与资源环境安徽省重点实验室,合肥,230031
  2. 长丰县农业技术推广中心, 安徽长丰,231100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "吴萍萍(1982-),女,副研究员,主要从事土壤资源环境研究。E-mail:pingpingwu1982@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201503118）安徽省农科院创新基金项目（17A1023）安徽省科技重大专项（17030701052）安徽省学术技术带头人项目
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.035
  中图分类号： S344;S511;S158.3
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴萍萍, 李录久, 耿言安, 等. 耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):243-248.

WU Pingping, LI Lujiu, GENG Yanan, et al. Effects of Tillage and Fertilization on Physicochemical Properties of Albic Soil and Rice Yields in Jianghuai Region[J]. 2018, 32(6): 243-248.
吴萍萍, 李录久, 耿言安, 等. 耕作与施肥措施对江淮地区白土理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):243-248. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.035.

WU Pingping, LI Lujiu, GENG Yanan, et al. Effects of Tillage and Fertilization on Physicochemical Properties of Albic Soil and Rice Yields in Jianghuai Region[J]. 2018, 32(6): 243-248. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.035.

摘要

针对连续旋耕白土田耕层浅薄、下层土壤黏重紧实、养分分布不均衡等问题，探索适合于白土稻田的耕作与施肥措施，以进一步提高江淮地区白土生产力和水稻产量水平。设置2种耕作方式（旋耕和翻耕）及3种施肥措施（单施化肥、化肥+有机肥、化肥+秸秆还田），通过大田定位试验研究不同耕作方式与施肥措施对白土稻田土壤理化性质、水稳性团聚体分布以及水稻产量的影响。结果表明，相较于旋耕，翻耕降低0—10 cm土层土壤养分含量，而使10—20 cm土层有机质、全氮、有效磷和速效钾含量分别提高3.2%~8.8%，4.5%~9.2%，5.2%~8.2%和8.3%~17.7%。增施有机肥或秸秆还田使土壤有机质和速效钾含量较单施化肥处理分别提高1.3%~8.6%和4.1%~21.1%。翻耕方式下10—20 cm土层土壤容重较旋耕降低14.4%~19.5%，土壤大团聚体比例在0—10，10—20 cm土层则较旋耕分别降低3.0%~5.4%和3.5%~9.7%；在翻耕的基础上增施有机肥或秸秆还田土壤容重较单施化肥降低2.1%~6.6%，大团聚体比例则提高2.8%~8.4%。翻耕有利于水稻产量的提高，较旋耕的增产幅度在11.7%~18.0%，增施有机肥或秸秆还田使水稻产量提高1.7%~7.5%。因此，江淮地区连续多年旋耕的白土田进行适宜翻耕结合秸秆还田或增施有机肥可改善0—20 cm土层土壤理化性质，有利于水稻产量的提升。

Abstract

Albic soil with continuous rotary tillage has resulted in some problems

including shallow plough layer

sticky and tight subsoil and unbalanced nutrient distribution. In order to explore suitable tillage and fertilization modes in paddy fields to improve albic soil productivity and rice yield in Jianghuai region

a field experiment was carried out to study the effects of different tillage and fertilization practices on physicochemical properties

the distribution of water-stable aggregates and rice yields in albic soil. The treatments consisted of two tillage practices (rotary tillage and conventional tillage) and three fertilization modes (chemical fertilizer

chemical fertilizer+organic manure

chemical fertilizer+straw returning). The results showed that compared to rotary tillage

conventional tillage reduced the soil nutrient contents of 0-10 cm soil layer

but increased the contents of organic matter

total nitrogen

available phosphorus and available potassium in 10-20 cm soil layer by 3.2%~8.8%

4.5%~9.2%

5.2%~8.2% and 8.3%~17.7%

respectively. The amendment of organic manure or straw returning increased the contents of soil organic matter and available potassium by 1.3%~8.6% and 4.1%~21.1%

respectively. The bulk density in 10-20 cm soil layer under conventional tillage was 14.4%~19.5% lower than that of rotary tillage

and the percentages of soil macro aggregates under conventional tillage were lower than rotary tillage by 3.0%~5.4% in 0-10 cm soil layer and 3.5%~9.7% in 10-20 cm soil layer

respectively. Under conventional tillage

the amendment of organic manure or straw returning reduced soil bulk density by 2.1%~6.6% and increased the percentage of macro aggregate by 2.8%~8.4%

compared to chemical fertilizer application. The rice yield under conventional tillage was 11.7%~18.0% higher than rotary tillage

and the amendment of organic manure or straw returning enhanced the rice yield by 1.7%~7.5%. Therefore

in albic soil with continuous rotary tillage in Jianghuai region

conventional tillage combined with straw returning or organic manure amendment was beneficial to improve soil physical and chemical properties of the 0-20 cm soil layer and increase rice yield.

关键词

Keywords

references

李玉洁,王慧,赵建宁,等.耕作方式对农田土壤理化因子和生物学特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(3):939-948.

赵亚丽,郭海斌,薛志伟,等.耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统中干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报,2014,40(10):1797-1807.

战秀梅,彭靖,李秀龙,等.耕作及秸秆还田方式对春玉米产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(3):204-209.

李凤博,牛永志,高文玲,等.耕作方式和秸秆还田对直播稻田土壤理化性质及其产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(3):549-552.

王秋菊,高中超,张劲松,等.黑土稻田连续深耕改善土壤理化性质提高水稻产量大田试验[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(9):126-132.

成臣,汪建军,程慧煌,等.秸秆还田与耕作方式对双季稻产量及土壤肥力质量的影响[J].土壤学报,2018,55(1):247-257.

柳开楼,李亚贞,秦江涛,等.中亚热带稻田不同耕作栽培和施肥模式对土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(2):310-317.

吴建富,潘晓华,石庆华,等.不同耕作方式对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(3):496-502.

马二登,纪洋,马静,等.耕种方式对稻田甲烷排放的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(6):513-518.

黄佑岗,冯跃华,许桂玲,等.不同耕作方式对杂交籼稻生长特性和产量形成的影响[J].中国稻米,2017,23(4):139-143.

夏立忠,傅桦,丁瑞兴.江淮流域白浆化土壤的矿物组成与化学特性的研究[J].土壤学报,2001,38(3):229-238.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

Elliott E T. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1986,50(3):627-633.

Xu L, He N P, Yu G R. Methods of evaluating soil bulk density:Impact on estimating large scale soil organic carbon storage[J].Catena,2016,144:94-101.

田慎重,王瑜,李娜,等.耕作方式和秸秆还田对华北地区农田土壤水稳性团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(22):7116-7124.

Zhang H M, Xu M G, Shi X J, et al. Rice yield, potassium uptake and apparent balance under long-term fertilization in rice-based cropping systems in southern China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2010,88(3):341-349.

戴志刚,鲁剑巍,李小坤,等.不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):272-276.

杨志臣,吕贻忠,张凤荣,等.秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对水稻土培肥效果对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(3):214-218.

梁尧,韩晓增,宋春,等.不同有机物料还田对东北黑土活性有机碳的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(17):3565-3574.

依艳丽.土壤物理研究法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.

张大伟,刘建,王波,等.连续两年秸秆还田与不同耕作方式对直播稻田土壤理化性质的影响[J].江西农业学报,2009,21(8):53-56.

殷志遥,黄丽,薛斌,等.稻-油轮作下保护性耕作对土壤肥力的影响及评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(11):1604-1614.

Huang X X, Gao M, Wei C F, et al. Tillage effect on organic carbon in a purple paddy soil[J].Pedosphere,2006,16(5):660-667.

谢先举.我国旱地免耕研究[J].耕作与栽培,1995(1):16-20,27.

王勇,姬强,刘帅,等.耕作措施对土壤水稳性团聚体及有机碳分布的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(7):1365-1373.

周萍,潘根兴.长期不同施肥对黄泥土水稳性团聚体颗粒态有机碳的影响[J].土壤通报,2007,38(2):256-261.

杨敏芳,朱利群,韩新忠,等.耕作措施与秸秆还田对稻麦两熟制农田土壤养分、微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):272-275,281.

Barreto R C, Madari B E, Maddock J E L, et al. The impact of soil management on aggregation, carbon stabilization and carbon loss as CO

in the surface layer of a Rhodic Ferralsol in Southern Brazil[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2009,132(3):243-251.

柯建国,陆建飞.深耕改良白浆土的效应研究[J].扬州大学学报(自然科学版),1998,1(3):47-49.

张玉屏,朱德峰,林贤青,等.田间条件下水稻根系分布及其与土壤容重的关系[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(2):141-144.

徐国伟,王贺正,翟志华,等.不同水氮耦合对水稻根系形态生理、产量与氮素利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(10):132-141.

Baker J M, Ochsner T E, Venterea R T, et al. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration:What do we really know?[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2007,118(1/4):1-5.

浏览量

1261

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

稻田水资源利用效用的灌排模式响应

灌溉与施肥对稻田氮磷径流流失的影响

大量沼液施灌稻田的氨挥发特征

不同水耕年限稻田土壤水分渗漏与保持特征

耕作方式对紫色水稻土总有机碳及颗粒态有机碳的影响