1. 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所, 宁夏防沙治沙与水土保持重点实验室,银川,750002
2. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所, 国家林业和草原局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京,100091
[ "韩新生(1988-),男,在读博士研究生,主要从事森林生态水文研究。E-mail:hanxs@caf.ac.cn" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
韩新生, 许浩, 蔡进军, 等. 宁南黄土丘陵区3种典型林分的结构与水文影响比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):192-199.
HAN Xinsheng, XU Hao, CAI Jinjun, et al. Comparison of Structure and Hydrological Influence of Three Typical Stands in Loess Hilly Regions of Southern Ningxia[J]. 2018, 32(6): 192-199.
韩新生, 许浩, 蔡进军, 等. 宁南黄土丘陵区3种典型林分的结构与水文影响比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):192-199. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.028.
HAN Xinsheng, XU Hao, CAI Jinjun, et al. Comparison of Structure and Hydrological Influence of Three Typical Stands in Loess Hilly Regions of Southern Ningxia[J]. 2018, 32(6): 192-199. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.028.
为分析宁南黄土丘陵区林分结构的水文功能影响关系及差异,以彭阳县3种典型林分(山杏纯林、山杏柠条混交林、山杏沙棘混交林)为对象,在2017年生长季观测了林下草本生物量和生物多样性、冠层降雨再分配、林下蒸散、土壤湿度的变化特征。结果表明:(1)林分地表覆盖度大小顺序为山杏沙棘混交林(0.81) > 山杏柠条混交林(0.71) > 山杏纯林(0.67);草本植物地上生物量为山杏沙棘混交林(0.86) > 山杏纯林(0.62) > 山杏柠条混交林(0.41);草本植物生物多样性为山杏柠条混交林>山杏沙棘混交林>山杏纯林。(2)3种林分类型的冠层都相对稀疏,降雨穿透率均>90%,穿透雨量与林外降雨呈线性正相关;干流量和林冠截留量与林外降雨呈对数关系。(3)林下蒸散的季节变化呈"单峰型",研究期间林下蒸散表现为山杏沙棘混交林(245.0 mm) > 山杏纯林(227.7 mm) > 山杏柠条混交林(220.9 mm),其中山杏柠条混交林的月际间差异最小。(4)生长季内土壤湿度在中上层(0—80 cm)表现为逐渐降低趋势,在深层则相反;深层土壤水分的林分差异为山杏纯林 > 山杏沙棘混交林 > 山杏柠条混交林。在干旱缺水、侵蚀严重的黄土区,要恢复以水土保持为主要功能的稳定植被时,既要考虑植被配置模式对地表覆盖和草本生物量及物种多样性的影响,也要考虑对土壤湿度的影响,因此建议在植被恢复中尽量选择山杏沙棘混交林和山杏纯林。
In order to analyze the relationship and difference of hydrological function of the stands structure in the loess hilly regions of southern Ningxia
the characteristics of understory herb biomass and biodiversity
canopy rainfall redistribution
forest understory evapotranspiration and soil moisture were studied in three typical forest stands (Armeniaca sibirica pure forest
Armenia sibirica-Caragana korshinskii mixed forest
Armeniaca sibirica-Hippophae rhamnoides mixed mixed forest)located in Pengyang County during the growing season in 2017. The results were as follows:(1) The order of stands surface coverage was A.sibirica-H.rhamnoides (0.81) > A.sibirica-C.korshinskii (0.71) > A.sibirica (0.67)
the aboveground biomass of herbaceous plants followed the order of A.sibirica- H.rhamnoides (0.86 t/hm2) > A. sibirica(0.62 t/hm2) > A. sibirica-C. korshinskii(0.41 t/hm2)
and the herbaceous plant biodiversity was followed the order of A.sibirica-C.korshinskii > A.sibirica-H.rhamnoides > A.sibirica. (2) The canopies of the three stands were relatively sparse
and the rainfall penetration rate were all greater than 90%
and the penetration rainfall was linearly correlated with the rainfall outside the forest
the stemflow and the canopy interception were logarithmic related to the rainfall outside the forest. (3) The seasonal variation of forest understory evaoptranspiration was "single-peak type"
and the size of forest understory evapotranspiration during the research period was followed the order of A.sibirica-H.rhamnoides (245.0 mm) > A.sibirica (227.7 mm) > A.sibirica-C.korshinskii (220.9 mm)
among them
the intermonthly variation of A.sibirica-C.korshinskiiwas the minimum. (4) The soil moisture in the middle and upper layers (0-80 cm) basically showed decreasing trend during the growing season
while the deep soil moisture showed the opposite trend
and the difference in the deep soil moisture was showed as A.sibirica > A.sibirica-H.rhamnoides > A.sibirica-C.korshinskii.In the severe erosion and drought-stricken loess region
when restoring stable vegetation with water and soil conservation as the main function
it was necessary to consider the effects of vegetation allocation patterns on surface cover and herb biomass and species diversity
as well as to consider the effect on soil moisture.Therefore
it is recommended to choose A.sibirica-H.rhamnoides mixed forest and A.sibiricapure forest in the vegetation restoration.
时忠杰,王彦辉,于澎涛,等.宁夏六盘山林区几种主要森林植被生态水文功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):134-138.
江淼华,吕茂奎,胥超,等.亚热带米槠次生林和杉木人工林林冠截留特征比较[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):116-121.
Bulcock H H, Jewitt G P W. Field data collection and analysis of canopy and litter interception in commercial forest plantations in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands, South Africa[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2012,16(10):3717-3728.
He Z B, Yang J J, Du J, et al. Spatial variability of canopy interception in a spruce forest of the semiarid mountain regions of China[J].Agricultural and Forest meteorology,2014,188(15):58-63.
王磊,孙长忠,周彬.北京九龙山不同结构侧柏人工纯林降水的再分配[J].林业科学研究,2016,29(5):752-758.
于立忠,王利,刘利芳,等.浑河上游典型水源涵养林降雨再分配过程[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):106-110.
马国飞,满苏尔·沙比提,张雪琪.托木尔峰自然保护区台兰河上游不同植被类型的水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):210-216.
孙浩,刘晓勇,何齐发,等.修河上游流域4种森林类型的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):337-341.
刘凯,贺康宁,田赟,等.青海高寒山区5种林分的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):141-146.
Crockford R H, Richardson D P. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception:Effect of forest type, ground cover and climate[J].Hydrological Processes,2000,14(16/17):2903-2920.
Bruijnzeel L A. Hydrological functions of tropical forests:not seeing the soil for the trees?[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2004,104(1):185-228.
王会利,唐玉贵,韦娇媚.低效林改造对土壤理化性质及水源涵养功能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(5):72-78.
Dietz J, Hölscher D, Leuschner C, et al. Rainfall partitioning in relation to forest structure in differently managed montane forest stands in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2006,237(1):170-178.
胡晓聪,黄乾亮,金亮.西双版纳热带山地雨林枯落物及其土壤水文功能[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(1):55-63.
刘凯,贺康宁,王先棒.青海高寒区不同密度白桦林枯落物水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(1):89-97.
刘贤德,张学龙,赵维俊,等.祁连山西水林区亚高山灌丛水文功能的综合评价[J].干旱区地理,2016,39(1):86-94.
王正安,邸利,王彦辉,等.六盘山叠叠沟小流域4种植被土壤层水文调节功能的综合评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(11):181-187.
冯琦雅,陈超凡,覃林,等.不同经营模式对蒙古栎天然次生林林分结构和植物多样性的影响[J].林业科学,2018,54(1):12-21.
姚甲宝,曾平生,袁小平,等.间伐强度对木荷-萌芽杉木中龄混交林生长和林分结构的影响[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(3):511-517.
张源润, 蔡进军, 董立国, 等. 半干旱退化山区坡改梯地土壤养分变异特征研究:以宁夏彭阳县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(3):121-124.
王月玲,蔡进军,张源润,等.半干旱退化山区不同生态恢复与重建措施下土壤理化性质的特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):11-14.
马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
卢建利,陈云明,张亚莉,等.黄土丘陵半干旱区沙棘生长对土壤水分及养分影响[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(3):137-140.
郭忠升.半干旱区柠条林利用土壤水分深度和耗水量[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(5):69-72.
张千千,王彦辉,缪丽萍,等.六盘山叠叠沟小流域草本地上生物量的空间变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(4):82-87.
孙浩,杨民益,余杨春,等. 宁夏六盘山几种典型水源涵养林林分结构与水文功能的关系[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2014,12(1):10-18.
赵娜,查同刚,周志勇.晋西黄土区不同树种配置对林下植被物种多样性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(3):44-45.
曲红,王百田,王棣,等.黄土区不同配置人工林物种多样性研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4):843-848.
朱桂丽,李杰,魏学红,等.青藏高寒草地植被生产力与生物多样性的经度格局[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(2):210-222.
曾晓阳,高永恒.青城山常绿阔叶林冠层结构对植被生物多样性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2017,52(2):65-70.
Ghimire C P, Bruijnzeel L A, Lubczynski M W, et al. Measurement and modeling of rainfall interception by two differently aged secondary forests in upland eastern Madagascar[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2017,545(12):212-225.
Iida S, Levia D F, Shimizu A, et al. Intrastorm scale rainfall interception dynamics in a mature coniferous forest stand[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,548(3):770-783.
刘泽彬,王彦辉,田奥,等.六盘山半湿润区坡面华北落叶松林冠层截留的时空变化及空间尺度效应[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):231-239.
李振华,王彦辉,于澎涛,等.六盘山半干旱区华北落叶松林的生长季蒸散量和组分特征[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(2):222-228.
Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Shao H B. A preliminary investigation of the dynamic characteristics of dried soil layers on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,381(1):9-17.
Wang Y Q, Shao M A,Zhu Y J, et al. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(4):437-448.
Yang L, Wei W, Chen L, et al. Spatial variations of shallow and deep soil moisture in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2012,16(9):3199-3217.
蔡进军,张源润,潘占兵,等.宁夏黄土丘陵区苜蓿土壤水分的时空变异特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):75-79.
王力,邵明安,张青峰.陕北黄土高原土壤干层的分布和分异特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):436-442.
方广玲,香宝,赵卫,等.基于GIS和RUSLE的拉萨河流域土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):6-12.
杨春霞,肖培青,甄斌,等.野外不同被覆坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):28-36.
0
浏览量
1352
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621