减量施氮及秸秆深埋对春玉米地土壤电导率和硝态氮淋溶的影响

吴三鼎; 董强; 党廷辉

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

减量施氮及秸秆深埋对春玉米地土壤电导率和硝态氮淋溶的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 减量施氮及秸秆深埋对春玉米地土壤电导率和硝态氮淋溶的影响
- Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Application and Deep Burial of Straw on Soil Electrical Conductivity and Nitrate Nitrogen Leaching in Spring Maize Field
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第6期页码：46-51
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "吴三鼎(1990-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤化学研究。E-mail:2313705336@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFD0800105-3）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.008
  中图分类号： S513;S143.1
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴三鼎, 董强, 党廷辉. 减量施氮及秸秆深埋对春玉米地土壤电导率和硝态氮淋溶的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):46-51.

WU Sanding, DONG Qing, DANG Tinghui. Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Application and Deep Burial of Straw on Soil Electrical Conductivity and Nitrate Nitrogen Leaching in Spring Maize Field[J]. 2018, 32(6): 46-51.
吴三鼎, 董强, 党廷辉. 减量施氮及秸秆深埋对春玉米地土壤电导率和硝态氮淋溶的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):46-51. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.008.

WU Sanding, DONG Qing, DANG Tinghui. Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Application and Deep Burial of Straw on Soil Electrical Conductivity and Nitrate Nitrogen Leaching in Spring Maize Field[J]. 2018, 32(6): 46-51. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.008.

摘要

通过在中国科学院长武黄土高原农业生态试验站半覆膜种植春玉米大田试验，研究了减氮及秸秆深埋对土壤电导率、土壤硝态氮淋溶和玉米产量的影响，旨在为提高氮肥利用效率和保护环境提供理论依据。试验设5个处理3个重复，处理包括不施氮（CK）、常规施氮（CON1，N 250 kg/hm2）、常规施氮加秸秆（CON2，N 250 kg/hm2+秸秆）、减量施氮（CR1，N 200 kg/hm2）和减量施氮加秸秆（CR2，N 200 kg/hm2+秸秆）。测量了春玉米各生育期土层剖面土壤电导率、收获期土壤硝态氮含量和春玉米产量。结果表明：土壤电导率在分蘖期、拔节期40—150 cm土层出现峰值，在抽穗期、成熟期40—200 cm土层出现峰值，峰值范围下移。在0—150 cm土层范围内，土壤电导率整体呈现CON2 > CON1，CR2 > CR1。在0—150 cm土层范围内，常规施氮土壤电导率高于减量施氮。与常规施氮相比，减量施氮减少了土壤剖面硝态氮含量，同时，采取秸秆深埋措施也能减少土壤剖面硝态氮含量，并延缓硝态氮的淋溶下移。与常规施氮相比，减量20%施氮增产9.59%。施氮条件下，秸秆深埋时，有利于提高作物产量，提高氮肥增产潜力。秸秆深埋有利于提高土壤电导率，减少土壤硝态氮含量，阻控土壤硝态氮向下淋溶，提高玉米产量。

Abstract

The effects of reduced nitrogen application and straw deep buried on soil electrical conductivity

yield of maize and residuals of soil nitrate nitrogen were researched through field experiment conducted in spring maize planted with semi-plastic film in the Changwu State Key Agro-Ecological Station

and aimed to provide theoretical support for improving the efficiency of nitrogen use and protecting the environment. The experiment included five treatments with three replicates

no nitrogen fertilization application (CK)

conventional nitrogen fertilization application (CON1

N 250 kg/hm2)

conventional nitrogen fertilization plus straw (CON2

N 250 kg/hm2)

reduced nitrogen fertilization application (CR1

N 200 kg/hm2)

and reduced nitrogen fertilization application plus straw (CR2

N 200 kg/hm2). The soil electrical conductivity at different growth stages of spring maize was investigated

and the soil nitrate nitrogen content and spring maize yield during the harvest period were measured. The results showed that:the peak values of soil electrical conductivity at the stages of maize tillering and jointing appeared at the soil profile of 40-150 cm

at the stages of maize heading and maturing the peak values of soil electrical conductivity appeared at the soil profile of 40-200 cm

and the range of peak value moved down. In the 0-150 cm soil profile

the soil electrical conductivity followed the order of CON2 > CON1

CR2 > CR1. In the 0-150 cm soil layer

the soil electrical conductivity of conventional nitrogen application was higher than those of reduced nitrogen application treatments. Compared with the traditional nitrogen fertilization application

the reduced nitrogen application reduced the nitrate nitrogen content in the soil profile. At the same time

deep buried straw could also reduce the nitrate nitrogen content in the soil profile and postpone the soil nitrate nitrogen leaching. Compared with the traditional nitrogen application

20% reduction of nitrogen fertilization could increase the maize yield by 9.59%. On the condition of nitrogen application

deep burying of straw was beneficial to increase crop yield and the potential of nitrogen production. Straw deep burying was beneficial to improve soil electrical conductivity

reduce soil nitrate nitrogen content

control soil nitrate nitrogen leaching and increase corn yield.

关键词

Keywords

references

徐钰,江丽华,林海涛,等.不同氮肥运筹对玉米产量、效益及土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J].土壤通报, 2011,42(5):1196-1199.

Zhou M, Butterbach-Bahl K. Assessment of nitrate leaching loss on a yield-scaled basis from maize and wheat cropping systems[J]. Plant & Soil, 2014,374(1/2):977-991.

闫湘,金继运,何萍,等.提高肥料利用率技术研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(2):450-459.

薛晓辉,郝明德.小麦氮磷肥长期配施对土壤硝态氮淋溶的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(3):918-925.

Rimskikorsakov H, Rubio G, Lavado R S. Fate of the nitrogen from fertilizers in field-grown maize[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2012, 93(3):253-263.

Xu Z, Xie Y X, Xiong Z Q, et al. Nitrogen fate and environmental consequence in paddy soil under rice-wheat rotation in the Taihu lake region, China[J]. Plant & Soil, 2009, 319(1/2):225-234.

商放泽,杨培岭,李云开,等.不同施氮水平对深层包气带土壤氮素淋溶累积的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):103-110.

Withers P J A, Neal C, Jarvie H P, et al. Agriculture and eutrophication:Where do we go from here?[J]. Sustainability, 2014, 6(9):5853-5875.

刘芳,张长生,陈爱武,等.秸秆还田技术研究及应用进展[J].作物杂志,2012(2):18-23.

鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

杨靖民,张忠庆,曹国军.应用间隔流动分析仪测定土壤硝态氮和亚硝态氮含量[J].中国土壤与肥料,2014(2):101-105.

杨卫中,王一鸣,李保国,等.基于相位检测原理的TDR土壤电导率测量研究[J].农业机械学报,2010,41(11):183-187.

石德杨,张海艳,董树亭.土壤高残留氮条件下施氮对夏玉米氮素平衡、利用及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(1):37-44.

孙启祥,张建锋,Makeschin Franz.不同土地利用方式土壤化学性状与酶学指标分析[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):98-101.

赵勇,李民赞,张俊宁.冬小麦土壤电导率与其产量的相关性[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(增刊2):34-37.

王珍,冯浩,吴普特,等.土壤扩蓄增容肥对春玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):114-119.

李良勇,李帆,黄松青,等.稻草不同还田量和还田方式对烤烟养分吸收及产质的影响[J].福建农业学报,2007,22(1):10-14.

赵营,同延安,赵护兵.不同施氮量对夏玉米产量、氮肥利用率及氮平衡的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2006(2):30-33.

潘剑玲,代万安,尚占环,等.秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):526-535.

赵鹏, 陈阜.秸秆还田配施氮肥对夏玉米氮利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2009,43(1):14-18.

戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤,等.不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验[J].农业工程学报, 2010,26(6):272-276.

Kasperbauer M J. Cotton seedling shoot and root growth responses to light reflected from straw-covered versus bare soil[J]. Crop Science, 1999, 39(1):164-167.

战秀梅,彭靖,李秀龙,等.耕作及秸秆还田方式对春玉米产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J].华北农学报,2014,29(3):204-209.

周怀平,解文艳,关春林,等.长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):321-330.

黄婷苗,郑险峰,侯仰毅,等.秸秆还田对冬小麦产量和氮、磷、钾吸收利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):853-863.

张定一,党建友,王姣爱,等.施氮量对不同品质类型小麦产量、品质和旗叶光合作用的调节效应[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(4):535-542.

浏览量

1371

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

土壤含水量和电导率对芦苇生长和种群分布的影响

秸秆深埋配合减氮对旱塬春玉米水分利用的影响

土壤含水量和电导率对芦苇生长和种群分布的影响

基于EMI的小泊湖退化湿地土壤盐分的空间分布