1. 辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院,辽宁,阜新,123000
2. 辽宁省风沙地改良利用研究所,辽宁,阜新,123000
[ "淑敏(1984-),女,博士,主要从事水土保持与城市生态修复研究。E-mail:bcym1984@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
淑敏, 斯日木极, 姜涛, 等. 辽宁西北部主要绿化树种对空气颗粒物滞留能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):297-303.
SHU Min, SI Rimuji, JIANG Tao, et al. Retention Capacity of the Main Urban Afforest Plant Species for Atmospheric Particles in Northwest of Liaoning Province[J]. 2018, 32(4): 297-303.
淑敏, 斯日木极, 姜涛, 等. 辽宁西北部主要绿化树种对空气颗粒物滞留能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):297-303. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.047.
SHU Min, SI Rimuji, JIANG Tao, et al. Retention Capacity of the Main Urban Afforest Plant Species for Atmospheric Particles in Northwest of Liaoning Province[J]. 2018, 32(4): 297-303. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.047.
采用洗脱法测定了辽西北地区阜新市15种常见绿化树种单位叶面积滞留粗颗粒物(TSP)及细颗粒物(PM2.5)的质量,分析比较了15种树种叶片去除TSP和PM2.5能力以及随着空间变化的规律。结果表明:(1)不同树种单位叶面积TSP和PM2.5滞留量均存在显著差异,变化范围分别为3.68~5.94 g/m2和0.47~0.92 g/m2,树种间滞留能力的差值可达2倍左右。(2)在同一个功能区不同树种滞留TSP和PM2.5的差异由树冠高度(绿篱 > 灌木 > 乔木)和叶表面粗糙度(叶表面沟槽宽度的不同可能是沟槽宽度过宽和过窄均不利于叶片捕集颗粒物,且颗粒物滞留量随沟槽深度增加而增大)以及叶片比叶重(比叶重大的滞尘量大)等所引起。(3)在不同功能区同一树种单位叶面积滞留TSP量的排序为工业区 > 商业交通区 > 露天矿区 > 清洁区,而PM2.5滞留量则无明显差异。乔木中新疆杨、灌木中紫丁香的单位叶面积滞留量与单株滞留量都较高,起到明显的降尘作用,是沙尘频发的辽西北地区城市绿化树种的优先之选。
In this study
elution method was used to determine the retention quality amounts of TSP (larger particles) and PM2.5 (smaller particles) per unit leaf area of 15 common afforest plant species. The retentive capacities of TSP and PM2.5 for leaves from different plant species were analyzed and compared
and the location-variation law was investigated. Results showed:(1) There were significant differences in the retention amounts of TSP and PM2.5 per unit leaf area among plant species
ranging from 3.68 to 5.94 g/m2 for TSP
and from 0.47 to 0.92 g/m2 for PM2.5
respectively. The largest difference of retention amounts for plant species reached up to 2 times. (2) In the same location
the retention capacities of TSP and PM2.5 for different plant species varied as the variations of canopy height
blade surface roughness and specific leaf weight. Specifically
the sequence of retention capacities from high to low was hedge plants
bush plants and arbor plants
and the species with larger specific leaf weight had stronger retention capacity. For the factors of surface roughness
the retention amount of particles increased as the increase of groove depth
and a leaf with neither too wide nor too narrow groove width was proved to have good retention capacity. (3) For the retention amount of TSP in varied locations
the sequence from high to low was Industrial Area (IA)
Transportation Area (TA)
Open-pit Mine (OP)
and Clean Area (CA). In the case of PM2.5
there were little difference at those locations. The particle retention amounts per leaf area or per plant of P.albavar.pramidalis and Syringa oblata were higher than those of other examined species. Thus
those two species could be chosen as the priority species for urban afforestation for cities in Northwest of Liaoning Province with much dust weather.
Bckett P, Freer-Smth P H, Taylor G. Effective tree species for local air-quality management[J]. Journal of Arboriculture,2000,26(1):12-19.
Shen J C, Chen C, Duo K X, et al. Rescarch on the concentration, element component and evaluation of ambient PM
2.5
in Zhengzhou[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2012,S2:243-245.
Powe N A, Willis K G. Mortality and morbidity benefits of air pollution (SO
2
and PM
10
) absorption attributable to woodland in Britain[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2004,70(2):119-128.
Patricia S V M, Teran L M. Air pollution:Impact and prevention[J]. Respirology,2012,17(7):1031-1038.
Yan J, Lin L, Zhou W, et al. A novel approach for quan-tifiying particulate matter distribution on leaf surface by combining SEM and object-based image analysis[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2016,173(4):156-161.
Wang Z H, Li J B. Capacity of dust uptake by leaf surface of
Euonymus japonicus
Thunb. and the morphology of captured particle in air polluted city[J]. Ecology and Environment,2006,15(2):327-330.
Wang B, Lu S W. Evaluation of economic forest ecosystem services in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(2):417-425.
Litter P. Deposition of 2.75, 5.0 and 8.5μm particles to plant soil surfaces[J].Environment Pollution,1977,12:293-305.
Verma V, Pakbin P, Cheung K L, et al. Physicochemical and oxidative characteristics of semi-volatile components of quasiultrafine particles in an urban atmosphere[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(4):1025-1033.
Simkhovich B Z, Kleinman M T, Kloner R A. Air pollution and cardiovascular injury-epidemiology, toxicology, and mechanisms[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2008,52(9):719-726.
刘璐,管东生,陈永.广州市常见行道树种叶片表面形态与滞尘能力[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2604-2614.
赵松婷,李新宇,李延明.园林植物滞留不同粒径大气颗粒物的特征及规律[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(2):271-276.
Schleicher N J, Norra S, Chai F, et al. Temporal variability of trace metal mobility of urban particulate matter from Beijing:A contribution to health impact assessments of aerosols[J].Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(39):7248-7265.
王凯,朱教君,于立忠,等.遮阴对黄波罗幼苗的光合特性及光能利用效率的影响[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(5):1003-1012.
任引.遵义市城区行道树结构优化分析.南京:南京林业大学,2005.
赵勇,李树人,阎志平.城市绿地的滞尘效应及评价方法[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(6):582-586.
柴一新,祝宁,韩焕金.城市绿化树种的滞尘效应:以哈尔滨市为例[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1121-1126.
谢滨泽,王会霞,杨佳,等.北京常见阔叶绿化植物滞留PM
2.5
能力与叶面微结构的关系[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(12):2432-2438.
周蕴薇,田忠平,苏欣.哈尔滨市常见绿化树种叶表面形态与滞尘能力的关系[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(1):287-292.
张维康,王兵,牛香.北京市常见树种叶片吸滞颗粒物能力时间动态研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(10):3840-3847.
程政红,吴际友,刘云国,等.岳阳市主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究[J].城市林业,2004,2(2):37-40.
戴斯迪,马克明,宝乐.北京城区行道树国槐叶面尘分布及重金属污染特征[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5095-5102.
殷彬,蔡静萍,陈丽萍,等.交通绿化带植物配置对空气颗粒物的净化作用[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4590-4595.
齐飞艳,朱彦锋,赵勇,等.郑州市园林植物滞留大气颗粒物能力的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2009,43(3):256-259.
王蕾,高尚玉,刘连友,等.北京市11种园林植物滞留大气颗粒物能力研究[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(4):597-601.
潘瑞,涂志华,李炎梅,等.人面竹等10种观赏竹冬季滞尘效应与规律研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(7):270-275.
张景,吴祥云.阜新城区园林绿化植物叶片滞尘规律[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2012,30(6):905-909.
王亚军,郁珊珊.厦门市常见园林树种滞尘效应及生态特性研究[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(8):1987-1992.
0
浏览量
1114
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621